 | 1833 - 874 halaman
...want of gVill Where there has been contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff, — ie, where he might, by the exercise of ordinary care have avoided the consequences of the defendant's negligence— be is not entitled to recover. By 9 and 10 Viet. c. 93 (commonly called... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Exchequer, Roger Meeson, William Newland Welsby - 1838 - 828 halaman
...with perfect correctness in the case of Butterfield v. Forrester: and that rule is, that, although there may have been negligence on the part of the...of ordinary care, have avoided the consequences of the defendant's negligence, he is entitled to recover : if by ordinary care he might have avoided them,... | |
 | Ireland. Court of King's Bench - 1850 - 646 halaman
...defendants' negligence." In a note to Raisin v. Mitchell (b) the result is thus stated, that " although there may have been " negligence on the part of the...of ordinary care have avoided the consequences of " the defendant's negligence, he is entitled to recover ; if by ordinary "care he might have avoided... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Exchequer - 1840 - 554 halaman
...negligence. In Butterfield v. Forrester («'), Lord Ellenborough states the rule to be, that although there may have been negligence on the part of the...of ordinary care have avoided the consequences of the defendant's negligence, he is entitled to recover; if by ordinary care he might have avoided them,... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, John Scott - 1841 - 922 halaman
...correctness in the case of Butterfield v. Forrester, 11 East, 60; and that rule is, that, although there may have been, negligence on the part of the...of ordinary care, have avoided the consequences of the defendant's negligence, he is entitled to recover : if by ordinary care he might have avoided them,... | |
 | William Selwyn - 1842 - 822 halaman
...in both parties, and yet the plaintiff may be entitled to recover ; for the rule is, that although there may have been negligence on the part of the...of ordinary care have avoided the consequences of the defendant's negligence, he is entitled to recover : if by ordinary care he might have avoided them,... | |
 | Archibald John Stephens - 1842 - 998 halaman
...said, " The rule of law is laid do« in Butterfield v. Forrester (11), and that rule is, that although there may have been negligence on the part of the...of ordinary care, have avoided the consequences of the defendant's negligence, he is entitled to recover : if by ordinary care he might have avoided them,... | |
 | 1843 - 534 halaman
...general rule of law respecting negligence is, that although there may have been negligence on the pait of the plaintiff, yet unless he might by the exercise...of ordinary care have avoided the consequences of the defendant's negligence, he is entitled to recover. Therefore, where the defendant negligently drove... | |
 | John Simcoe Saunders - 1844 - 594 halaman
...223; Rogers v. Imbleton, 2 N R. 118. [The general rule of law respecting negligence is, that although there may have been negligence on the part of the...of ordinary care have avoided the consequences of the defendant's negligence, he is entitled to recover. Therefore, where the defendant negligently drove... | |
 | Henry Roscoe - 1844 - 910 halaman
...Junction Railway Co., 3 M. 4- W. 244. ; in which case Parkc B. states the rule to be that, although there may have been negligence on- the part, of the...of ordinary care have avoided the consequences of the defendant's negligence, he is entitled to recover : if by ordinary care he might have avoided this,... | |
| |
I believe quite correctly, that "the rule of law is laid down with perfect correctness in the case of Butterfield v. Forrester, that, although there may have been negligence on the part of the plaintiff, yet unless he might, by the exercise of ordinary... 
