 | 1927 - 612 halaman
...patent law the sub*» stantial equivalent of a thing is the same as the thing itself; that is to say, 'if two devices do the same work, in substantially...same, even though they differ in name, form or shape.' "Again, old ingredients known at the date of letters patent granted for an invention consisting of... | |
 | United States. Court of Claims - 1919 - 740 halaman
...Co. v. Automatic Scale Co., 204 US, 609 ; Diamond Rubber Co., v. Consolidated Tire Co., 220 US, 428. If two devices do the same work in substantially the same way and accomplish the same result, they are the same even though they differ in name, form, or shape. Many other cases... | |
 | United States. Circuit Court (1st Circuit), William Henry Clifford - 1869 - 714 halaman
...and accomplish substantially the same result, they are the same ; and so if parts of the two machines do the same work in substantially the same way and accomplish substantially -the result, those parts are the same, although they may differ in name, form, or shape ; but in both cases,... | |
 | Charles Sidney Whitman - 1871 - 734 halaman
...(Morris v. Barrett, 1 Fish., 461.) If the parts of two machines, having the same mode of operation, do the same work in substantially the same way, and accomplish substantially the same result, those parts are the same, although they may differ in name, form, or shape. (Union Sugar Refinery v.... | |
 | Charles Sidney Whitman - 1871 - 736 halaman
...(Morris v. Barrett, 1 Fish., 461.) If the parts of two machines, having the same mode of operation, do the same work in substantially the same way, and accomplish substantially the same, result, those parts are the same, although they may differ in name, form, or shape. ( Union Sugar Refinery... | |
 | Henry Edward Wallace - 1875 - 676 halaman
...infringing devices embodied in the defendants' machines " have substantially the same mode of operation, do the same work in substantially the same way, and accomplish substantially the same results" as those claimed by the complainants. In the defendants' machine is to be observed a rake-head... | |
 | United States. Circuit Court (1st Circuit), William Henry Clifford - 1878 - 766 halaman
...that he reduced what he conceived to practice. If two machines, having the same mode of operation, do the same work in substantially the same way and accomplish substantially the same i«)ult, they are the same, though differing in form, shape, or name. If the defendant's means of causing... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1879 - 790 halaman
...Authorities concur that the substantial equivalent of a thing, in the sense of the patent law, is the same as the thing itself; so that if two devices do...same, even though they differ in name, form, or shape. Curtis, Patents (4th ed.), sect. 310. Apply that principle to the case before court, and it is clear... | |
 | 1902 - 2074 halaman
..."Authorities concur that the substantial equivalent of a thing, In the sense of the patent law, is the same as the thing itself; so that, if two devices...even though they differ in name, form, or shape." But, if the evidence in the case had shown that the rod described in the Ohnermus and Sanner patent... | |
 | 1897 - 2078 halaman
...appears to us to be correct. We cannot discover any material difference between the two devices. They do the same work in substantially the same way, and accomplish substantially the same result. 2. The second stated objection to the interlocutory decree is "that the patent has never been sustained... | |
| |
Authorities concur that the substantial equivalent of a thing, in the sense of the patent law, is the same as the thing itself; so that if two devices do the same work in substantially the same way, and accomplish substantially the same result, they are... 
