| United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1909 - 84 halaman
...Supreme Court of the United States. "But as the Constitution stands the selection of the appointing power as between the functionaries named is a matter resting in the discretion of Congress. * * * But the duty to appoint inferior officers when required thereto by law is a constitutional duty... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1973 - 648 halaman
...this effect in the Constitution * * * But as the Constitution stands, the selection of the appointing power, as between the functionaries named, is a matter resting in the discretion of the Congress. * * * But the duty to appoint inferior officers, when required thereto by law, is a constitutional... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1974 - 660 halaman
...effect in the Constitution ; . . . . "But as the Constitution stands, the selection of the appointing power, as between the functionaries named, is a matter resting in the discretion of Congress. . . . [T]he duty to appoint inferior officers, when required thereto by law, is a constitutional duty... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Government Operations - 1975 - 476 halaman
...this effect in the Constitution . . . . " The court further said that the selection of the appointment power, as between the functionaries named, is a matter resting in the discretion of Congress. Siebold specifically limited the effect ofHennen and cited the "incongruity" test. Professor Paul Freund,... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1989 - 1312 halaman
...this effect in the Constitution . . . [A]s the Constitution stands, the selection or che appointing power, as between the functionaries named, is a matter resting in the discretion of Congress." Ex Parte Siebold thus offers substantial support for the concept of a special prosecutor, and the Supreme... | |
| |