Gambar halaman
PDF
ePub

650

Page

Page Hale, Ayer & Co. v. B., C. R. & N. CIRCUIT COURT, E. D. MISSOURI. R. Co....

203 Tschergi & Schwinde, Bullock & Clark County, Whitford v......

644, 837 Co. V.. 345 Douglass, Milnev.

37 Ellerbe, In re.

530 Fletcher v. New York Life Ins. Co., 526 CIRCUIT COURT, D. Iowa, C. D.

Gay v. Joplin... Burham v. Fritz...

368

Gentry v. Grand View Min. & Smelt.
Co.

..544, 843 Fritz, Burham v.

368

Grand View Min, & Smelt. Co.,
Gentry v..

.....544, 843 CIRCUIT COURT, D. IOWA, N. D. Harrison v. Union Pac. Ry. Co..... 52 Hawkins, Stinson v..

833 John V. Farwell & Co., Ohlquist v., 305 Hibernia Ins. Co. v. St. Louis & N.

0. T. Co....

516 Ohlquist v. John V. Farwell & Co., 305

Joplin, Gayv.

650 Milne v. Douglass.

37 CIRCUIT COURT, D. Iowa, S. D. New York Life Ins. Co., Fletcher v. 526 O'Brien, Phelan v.

656 Am. Cent. Ins. Co., Bailey v........ 250 Phelan v. O'Brien.

656 Bailey v. Am. Cent. Ins. Čo........ 250 St. Louis & N. 0. T. Co., Hibernia

Ins. Co. V...

516 Stinson v. Hawkins,

833 CIRCUIT COURT, D. Iowa, W. D.

Stout v. Yaeger Milling Co... 802 McCoy, Percival v........

379 Union Pac. Ry. Co., Harrison v..... 522 Percival v. McCoy..

379 Whitford v. Člark County......644, 837

Yaeger Milling Co., Stout v......... 802 CIRCUIT COURT, N. D. Iowa.

Circuit Court, W. D. MISSOURI, E. D. Illinois Cent. R. Co., McCabe v..... 827 McCabe v. Illinois Cent. R. Co...... 827 Crittenden, Ralston v.

508 Dixon, In re.

109 Ralston v. Crittenden.

508 CIRCUIT COURT, D. KANSAS.

CIRCUIT COURT, W. D. MISSOURI, W. D. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co., Kansas Pac. Ry. Co. v. 106 Burnes, Courtright v

317 Kansas Pac. Ry. Co. v. Atchison,

Courtright v. Burnes.

317 T. & S. F. R. Co...

106

CIRCUIT COURT, D. MINNESOTA.

CIRCUIT COURT, D. NEBRASKA.

Tab-
Bartlett v. Smith ...

Burlington & M. R. R. Co.,
263
oreck v

103 Brewis v. City of Duluth and Village

Domestic & For. Missionary Society of Duluth......

334
v. Hinman..

161 Carson, Tuedt v...

353
Giles v. Little...

100 City of Duluth and Village of Duluth, Brewis v. ...

334

Hinman, Domestic & For. Missionarv Society v.....

161 Gottfried v. Stahlmann. 673

198 Griesser v. McIlrath..

Kellogg v. Miller. 373

100

Little, Giles v. Kennedy, Messchaert v.. 242

198 Kennedy, Sahlgaard v.

Miller, Kellogg v. 242

Taboreck v. B. & M. R. R. Co...... 103 Kennedy, Stricker v...

242 Mather v. Nesbit

872 Mcllrath, Griesser v.

373 Messchaert v. Kennedy

242

NINTH CIRCUIT. Nesbit, Mather v.

872 Sahlgaard v. Kennedy

242 Smith, Bartlett v...

263 CIRCUIT Court, D. CALIFORNIA. Stahlmann, Gottfried v.

673 Stricker v. Kennedy.. 242 Ah Sing, In re...

286 Tuedt v. Carson. 353' Ah Tie, In re....

291 Paço

Page Chinese Cabin Waiter, Case of the... 286 Southern Pac, R. Co., County of San Chinese Laborers on Shipboard, Case Mateo v.

. 145, 722 of the... 291 Stanly, Hayner v.

217 Chinese Merchant, Case of the.. 605 County of San Mateo v. So. Pac.R.

DISTRICT Court, D. CALIFORNIA. Co..

.145, 722 Crellin v. Ely.. 420 Simpson v. Spreckels....

93 Dinwiddie, San Francisco & N. R.

Spreckels, Simpson v....

93 Co.v.

789 Ely, Crellin v.

420

CIRCUIT COURT, D. OREGON.
Foye v. Nichols.

125
Brooks, Watson v.

540 Hayner v. Stanly:

217
Bush v. United States.

625 Low Yam Chow, In re.

605
Devonshire, The..

39 Nichols, Foyev

125
United States, Bush v..

625 Quong Woo, In re.

229
Watson v. Brooks...

540 Railroad Tax Cases, The.

722 San Francisco & N. R. Co. v. Din

789

DISTRICT COURT, D. OREGON. Sonoma County Tax Case, The..... 789 Whistler, The

295

widdie ......

[ocr errors]

CASES

ARGUED AND DETERMINED

IN TIIE

átnited States Circuit and District Courts.

LAWRENCE v. NORTON and others.

(Circuit Court, N. D. Texas. 1882.)

1. REMOVAL OF CAUSE--QUESTIONS ARISING UNDER UNITED STATES LAWS.

Where the petition of the plaintiff presents a question which arises under the laws of the United States, the cause is removable under section 2 of the act

of March 3, 1875, without regard to the citizenship of the parties. 2. SAME--CONDITION IN MARSHAL's BOND--SECTION 783, REV. ST.

Where the condition of a marshal's official bond is in strict conformity with the condition prescribed by section 783 of the Revised Statutes, and the exceptions filed raise the question of what is the proper construction of the condition, and the construction of the language of the section is brought in question, the cause is removable.

Heard on Motion to Remand.

The Revised Statutes of the United States, $ 783, require that every marshal, before he enters upon the duties of his office, shall give bond, with two good and sufficient sureties, for the faithful performance of said duties by himself and his deputies.

In pursuance of this statute, A. Banning Norton, one of the defendants, having been nominated and appointed marshal of the United States for the northern district of Texas, executed his official bond, dated May 1, 1879, in the penalty of $20,000, with the other defendants as sureties, conditioned as required by the statute. During Norton's term of office, Lawrence, the plaintiff in this action, brought suit in the district court of Kaufman county, Texas, against

0.13,no.12)

« SebelumnyaLanjutkan »