xix Page Page Hale, Ayer & Co. v. B., C. R. & N. R. Co.... Tschergi & Schwinde, Bullock & Co. v...... CIRCUIT COURT, E. D. MISSOURI. 203 Clark County, Whitford v............ 644, 837 345 Douglass, Milne v... 37 Ellerbe, In re... 530 CIRCUIT COURT, D. Iowa, C. D. Fletcher v. New York Life Ins. Co.. 526 Gay v. Joplin.. 650 Burham v. Fritz. Gentry v. Grand View Min. & Smelt. 368 Co... Grand View Min. & Smelt. Co., Gentry v.. .....544, 843 .544, 843 305 CIRCUIT COURT, D. Iowa, N. D. John V. Farwell & Co., Ohlquist v.. Ohlquist v. John V. Farwell & Co.. 305 CIRCUIT COURT, D. Iowa, S. D. Hibernia Ins. Co. v. St. Louis & N. O. T. Co.... Joplin, Gay v. Milne v. Douglass. Harrison v. Union Pac. Ry. Co..... 52 Hawkins, Stinson v..... 833 516 650 37 New York Life Ins. Co., Fletcher v. 526 O'Brien, Phelan v. 656 Phelan v. O'Brien. 656 250 St. Louis & N. O. T. Co., Hibernia Ins. Co. v. 516 CIRCUIT COURT, D. Iowa, W. D. Stinson v. Hawkins.. 833 Stout v. Yaeger Milling Co.... 802 Union Pac. Ry. Co., Harrison v. 522 Percival v. McCoy.. 379 Whitford v. Člark County... .644, 837 .... Yaeger Milling Co., Stout v......... 802 CASES ARGUED AND DETERMINED IN THE United States Circuit and District Courts. LAWRENCE V. NORTON and others. (Circuit Court, N. D. Texas. 1882.) 1. REMOVAL OF CAUSE--QUESTIONS ARISING UNDER UNITED STATES LAWS. Where the petition of the plaintiff presents a question which arises under the laws of the United States, the cause is removable under section 2 of the act of March 3, 1875, without regard to the citizenship of the parties. 2. SAME--CONDITION IN MARSHAL'S BOND--SECTION 783, REV. ST. Where the condition of a marshal's official bond is in strict conformity with the condition prescribed by section 783 of the Revised Statutes, and the exceptions filed raise the question of what is the proper construction of the condition, and the construction of the language of the section is brought in question, the cause is removable. Heard on Motion to Remand. The Revised Statutes of the United States, § 783, require that every marshal, before he enters upon the duties of his office, shall give bond, with two good and sufficient sureties, for the faithful performance of said duties by himself and his deputies. In pursuance of this statute, A. Banning Norton, one of the defendants, having been nominated and appointed marshal of the United States for the northern district of Texas, executed his official bond, dated May 1, 1879, in the penalty of $20,000, with the other defendants as sureties, conditioned as required by the statute. During Norton's term of office, Lawrence, the plaintiff in this action, brought suit in the district court of Kaufman county, Texas, against v.13,no.1-1 |