Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1888, by

L. K. STROUSE & CO.,

In the Office of the Librarian of Congress at Washington.

08-5-46 ZW.

Узамора

TABLE OF CASES.

PAGE.

Act to Regulate Commerce

Alabama Great Southern R'y Co. et al., George Rice v.
Allen, David F., et al., v. Louisville, New Albany and

660

503

Baltimore and Ohio R. R. Co., Riddle, Dean & Co. v.
Baltimore and Ohio R. R. Co., Riddle, Dean & Co. v.
Boards-of-Trade Union of Farmington, etc. v. Chicago,

372

608

Commerce v.

Boston and Albany R. R. Co. v. Boston and Lowell R.
R. Co. et al.
Boston and Albany R. R. Co. et al., Boston Chamber of

Boston Chamber of Commerce v. Lake Shore and Mich-
igan Southern R'y Co.
Boston Chamber of Commerce v. Lake Shore and Mich-

Boston Chamber of Commerce v. New York Central and

Hudson River R. R. Co..

436

Boston and Lowell R. R. Co. et al., Boston and Albany
R. R. Co. v.

Boston and Lowell R. R. Co. et al., Vermont State
Grange v.

Burton Stock Car Co. v. Chicago, Burlington and Quincy
R. R. Co. et al.

Cape Girardeau and Southwestern R'y Co., Missouri
and Illinois Railroad Tie and Lumber Co. v.

Cases and Proceedings before the Commission, Rules

of Practice in .

Cases at issue. In re procedure in

Chicago and Alton R. R. Co. v. Pennsylvania Co.

Chicago and Alton R. R. Co. v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co.

Chicago, Burlington and Northern R. R. Co. et al., La

Crosse Manufacturers' and Jobbers' Union v.

Chicago, Burlington and Quincy R. R. Co. et al., v. Bur-

ton Stock Car Co. v.

Chicago and Grand Trunk R'y Co., Michigan Central

R. R. Co v.

Chicago and Grand Trunk R'y Co., Louis Larrison v.

Chicago, Milwaukee and Saint Paul R'y Co., Boards of

Trade Union of Farmington, etc. v.

PAGE.

30

1

223

86

86

629

132

147

147

215

230

629

629

Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul R'y Co., E. B. Ray-

mond v.

Chicago, Milwaukee and Saint Paul R'y Co. et al., La

Crosse Manufacturers' and Jobbers' Union v.

Chicago and Northwestern R'y Co. et al., La Crosse

Manufacturers' and Jobbers' Union v.

Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific R. R. Co. v. New York

Central and Hudson River R. R. Co.

Chicago, Saint Paul, Minneapolis and Omaha R. R. Co.,

M. A. Fulton v.

Chicago, Saint Paul, Minneapolis and Omaha R. R.Co.,

F. D. Harding v.

Cincinnati, New Orleans and Texas Pacific R'y Co.,

George Rice v.

Cincinnati, New Orleans and Texas Pacific R'y Co. et

al., George Rice v.

Coal Creek and New River R. R. Co. et al., Heck and

Petree v.

Columbus and Western R'y. In re the tariffs of
Columbus and Western R'y et al., W. O. Harwell et al. v. 236
Councill, Wm. H. v. Western and Atlantic R. R. Co.
Crews, B. S. et al. v. Richmond and Danville R. R. Co.

Delaware and Hudson Canal Co. et al., Ralph W.

Thatcher v...

Disabled Soldiers and Sailors, In re

PAGE.

152

28

East Tennessee, Virginia and Georgia R'y Co., James
Pyle and Sons v.

465

East Tennessee, Virginia and Georgia R'y Co., W. B.
Farrar & Co. v.

480

East Tennessee, Virginia and Georgia R'y Co. et al.,
Heck and Petree v..

495

Evans, Milton v. Oregon Railway and Navigation Co.
Export Tariffs, In re Publication of

Export Trade of Boston, In re

Farrar, W. B. & Co. v. East Tennessee, Virginia and
Georgia R'y Co. et al.

Fish and Fisheries, In re United States Commission of
Fulton, M. A. v. Chicago, Saint Paul, Minneapolis and
Omaha R. R. Co.

21

104

Gardner G. Clinton, Receiver, et al., Thos. J. Rey

Harding, F. D. v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis and

Harwell, W. O. et al. v. Columbus and Western R. R.

Heck and Petree v. East Tennessee, Virginia and Geor

Holbrook, Wm. M. et al. v. St. Paul, Minneapolis and

Illinois Central R'y Co., George Rice v.

Illinois Central R'y Co. et al., George Rice v.

102

Jackson, George M. v. St. Louis, Arkansas and Texas

PAGE.

184

657

5

225

Keith, Chas. W., et al., v. Kentucky Central R. R. Co.
et al.

Kentucky Central R. R. Co. et al., Chas. W. Keith et al. v.
Knoxville and Ohio R. R. Co. et al., Heck and Petree, v.

La Crosse Manufacturers' and Jobbers' Union v. Chi-
cago, Minneapolis and Saint Paul R'y Co.
Lake Shore and Michigan Southern R'y Co., Boston
Chamber of Commerce v.

Larrison, Louis, v. Chicago and Grand Trunk R'y Co.
Leonard, Leverett, v. Union Pacific R'y Co.

189

189

495

629

436

147

185

Louisville and Nashville R. R. Co., In re Petition of
Louisville and Nashville R. R. Co., George Rice v.
Louisville, New Albany and Chicago R. R. Co., David
F. Allen et al. v.
Louisville, New Orleans and Texas R. R. Co. et al.,
George Rice v.

Manufacturers' and Jobbers' Union of Mankato v. Minneapolis and Saint Louis R'y Co. et al.

Michigan Central R. R. Co. v. Chicago and Grand

Trunk R'y Co.

147

Minneapolis and Saint Louis R. R. Co. et al., Manufac

turers' and Jobbers' Union, &c., v.

227

Mississippi and Tennessee R. R. Co., George Rice v.
Missouri and Illinois R. R. Tie and Lumber Co. v. Cape

503

Girardeau and Southwestern R'y Co. .
Missouri Pacific R'y Co., Associated Wholesale Grocers

30

of Saint Louis v.

156

Mobile and Ohio R. R. Co., George Rice v.

Newport News and Mississippi Valley Co. et al., George

Rice v.

503