INDEX. ABERDEEN, MISS.. ABILENE COTTON OIL Co. v. TEXAS AND PACIFIC R. Co. ACCIDENT REPORTS amendments recommended ACCIDENTS, RAILWAY coupling and uncoupling cars. passengers train ACCOUNT, BOOKS OF. ACT OF MARCH 3, 1901... section 3. section 4. section 5. section 6. section 9. section 15. section 16. section 20. Page. 60 69 13, 14 14 76-79, 86-89, 161 76 78 77 76 11 13 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 14, 15, 16, 45, 135 9, 14, 15, 16, 48, 62, 136 33, 62, 133, 134 49 9 12 9, 13 AUGUSTA BROKERAGE CO., CENTRAL OF GEORGIA R. Co. v.. 37, 110 54, 118 50, 111 59 15, 16, 18, 56 71 16 9, 66, 69 71 BALTIMORE AND OHIO SOUTHWESTERN R. Co., GLOBE WERNICKE CO. v 44, 122 MERCE BELINGTON, W. VA.. BILL RECOMMENDED BY THE COMMISSION TO AMEND THE ACT TO REGULATE COM- BILOXI, MISS. BIRMINGHAM, ALA. 56 5, 175 15, 56 18 BLACKVILLE, S. C BLUEFIELD, W. VA BOOK CASES 20 56 15, 19 BROMBERG, MOBILE, JACKSON AND KANSAS CITY R. Co. v. 69 16, 20 34, 38, 56, 72 19, 40 BURDEN OF PROOF. BUREAU OF FREIGHT AND TRANSPORTATION OF CHARLESTON, S. C. BUSHFIELD, JESSE. 131 40 57 CANNON FALLS FARMERS' ELEVATOR CO. v. CHICAGO GREAT WESTERN R. Co. 36, 115 v. Murphey 70 CENTRAL R. Co. OF NEW JERSEY, MERSHON, SCHUETTE, PARKER & Co., v... 38, 110 44, 119 CENTRAL YELLOW PINE ASSOCIATION v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COM- PANY 27, 111 CHARGES elevator 10, 16 refrigeration 6, 7, 17, 19, 20, 30, 135 CHARLESTON BUREAU OF FREIGHT AND TRANSPORTATION v. NORFOLK AND CHARLESTON AND WESTERN CAROLINA R. Co., KEHOE & Co. v.. 40, 124 CHARLESTON, S. C 20 CHARLOTTE SHIPPERS' ASSOCIATION v. SOUTHERN R. Co... 39, 120 CHICAGO, ILL Page. 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 24, 25, 36, 37, 39, 40, 42, 44, 52, 56, 57, 63, 72 Cannon Falls Farmers' Elevator Co. v Chicago Live Stock Exchange v 36, 115 59, 63 United States v. CHICAGO LIVE STOCK EXCHANGE v. CHICAGO GREAT WESTERN R. Co. 22, 42, 63, 109 CITY GAS COMPANY OF NORFOLK v. BALTIMORE AND OHIO R. Co CIVIL CASES PENDING IN THE COURTS 36 59 59 69 163 19 49, 118 59, 62 15, 18, 19, 25, 56 131 58 15, 17, 18, 19, 41, 44, 60, 63, 131 CLEARFIELD, PA....... Wrigley v.. CLASS AND COMMODITY RATES..... CLASSIFICATION.. CLASSIFICATION OF RAILWAYS. CLERICAL FORCE OF THE COMMISSION Planters' Compress Co. v.. CLEVELAND, OHIO.. COAL... CLEVELAND, CINCINNATI, CHICAGO AND ST. LOUIS R. Co. 81, 82 56 93 COLORADO FUEL AND IRON Co............. COMMERCIAL VALUATION OF RAILWAY OPERATING PROPERTY Interpretation of figures Method of. COMMISSION'S AUTHORITY OVER RATES 56, 72 88-92 89 90 9 COMMODITIES, DISCRIMINATION BETWEEN COMPARATIVE INCOME ACCOUNT OF RAILWAYS OF THE UNITED STATES, CONSID- |