Gambar halaman
PDF
ePub

SUBJECTS OF CASES.

See Carriage of Goods, No. 22-Charter-party, No. 1 -Jurisdiction-Marine Insurance AssociationNecessaries, No. 3.

MARINE INSURANCE ASSOCIATION.

[ocr errors]

page 289

1. Rules of Power to expel member - Expulsion
without hearing — Action against.-A mutual
marine insurance association whose committee,
by the rules, have absolute power to expel a
member if they think his conduct suspicious, or
that he is, for any other reason, unworthy of re-
maining in the society, cannot expel any member
without hearing him, and giving him an oppor-
tunity of explaining his conduct, and any expul-
sion without a hearing is void; consequently an
action will not lie against the committee for ex-
pelling a member without a hearing, he being still
a member, and still entitled to enforce his rights
in equity, and having sustained no legal damage.
(Ex.) Wood v. Wood and others.......
2. Rules of Members-Shipowner not member pay-
ing contributions Right to sue-Estoppel.-
Where by the rules of a mutual marine insurance
association no person can become a member, ex-
cept by signing the articles; but a shipowner,
having an equitable interest, and having trans-
ferred to him the legal interest in a ship, which
has been insured in the association by its former
owner, a member, pays the contributions claimed
from him by the association, the latter are es-
topped from disputing the owner's interest in
the policy and his right to sue on it, although he
may not have complied with the rules as to
membership. (Q.B.) Edwards v. Aberayron
Mutual Shipping Insurance Society (Limited) ... 469
3. Rules of Settlement of disputes-Arbitration
-Appeal-Condition precedent.-Where such a
society provides by its rules that disputes are to
be settled by the directors, and that an appeal
shall be to the whole society, and that no action,
&c., should be brought for any claims on the
society by its members, such appeal must be re-
sorted to, and is a condition precedent to any
action against the society by a member for the
recovery of any loss, (Q.B.) Id.

4. Rules of Several insurance-Policies signed by
managers-Specification of names of insurers.—
Stamp act. Where by the rules of a marine as-
surance association, members severally, and not
jointly, insure each other's ships for one year
from noon of any day named, and the members
make annual contributions to meet the losses, any
excess going to a reserve fund, the managers
signing the policies for all members, and being
authorised to issue special rate policies for less
than a year to members, and the managers issue
special rate policies to members signing them with
the names 66
as joint managers per procuration of
the several members of the association for in-
suring each other's ships, every member bearing
his equal proportion according to the sums
mutually insured therein, excepting members
paying special rates," such signatures to the
policies are not valid within the meaning of
sect. 7 of 30 Vict. c. 23, as they are not a specifi-
cation of the names of the insurers, who are
necessarily varying from time to time. (L. JJ.
affirming M.R.) Re Average Association, Ex
parte Cory and Hawkesley

469

.530, 570

5. Rules of Special rate policies-Non-members-Ultra vires.-The issuing of special rate policies to non-members by the managers of such an association as above without authority by rule or otherwise is ultra vires. (L. JJ. affirming M. R.) Id. .530, 570

MARITIME LIEN.

See Master's Wages and Disbursements, Nos. 9, 10-Mortgagees, No. 1-Necessaries, Nos, 1, 2, 3, 5.

MARSHALLING ASSETS.

See Master's Wages and Disbursements, No. 9.

MASTER.

See Carriage of Goods, Nos. 33, 34, 35, 36, 39, 43Marine Insurance, No. 46-Master's Wages and Disbursements.

MASTER, DUTY AND POWERS OF. See Carriage of Goods, Nos. 33, 34, 35, 36, 39, 43. -Collision, Nos. 32, 33-Damage, No. 5-Marine Insurance, No. 46-Master's Wages and Disbursements-Necessaries, No. 4-Sale of Ship.

MASTER'S WAGES AND DISBURSEMENTS.

1. Co-owners-Set-off — Counter-claim-AccountMerchant Shipping Act 1854, sect. 191.-In a suit for wages and disbursements by a master, who is also co-owner, the other co-owners may, under the Merchant Shipping Act 1854 (17 & 18 Vict. c. 104) s. 191, set up a counter claim or set-off in respect of outstanding co-ownership accounts, and claim that the balance (if any) be paid to them. (Adm.) The City of Mobile

..page 123

2. Co-owner-Set-of― Counterclaim AccountReference to registrar and merchant-Merchant Shipping Act 1854, sect. 191-Pleading.-To a petition claiming master's wages and disbursements, and praying a reference of any accounts arising in respect thereto to the registrar and merchants, an answer alleging the master to be also co-owner, and that accounts are outstanding between the plaintiff and the defendants, as coowners, showing a balance on all accounts in favour of the defendants, and praying a reference to the registrar and merchants of all master's and co-ownership accounts, will be allowed by the High Court of Admiralty. (Adm.) Id. 3. Forfeiture of wages Drunkenness in port.Occasional drunkenness in port on the part of the master of a vessel will not, if unaccompanied with neglect of duty, work a forfeiture of wages. (Adm.) The Roebuck... 4. Forfeiture of wages· · Constant drunkenness.Semble, that constant drunkenness on the part of a master, whether there be proof of neglect of duty or not, will work a forfeiture of either the whole or part of his wages, according to circumstances. (Adm.) Id......

-

123

387

387

5. Forfeiture of wages-Disobedience to ordersDamage to ship-Ship worked against orders.— Where a master receives express orders from his owners as to the voyage which he is to make, and the ports to which he is to take the ship, and those orders are given under and with a view to a state of circumstances (political) out of which danger might arise to the ship, and which are known to and discussed by the master and owner at the time when they are given, the master is not justified, out of an alleged apprehension of that danger, in taking the ship on other voyages and to other ports; and if he does so take the ship, he will not be entitled to recover his wages for the time during which she is engaged against the owner's orders, even if the voyage is for the owners' benefit (Adm.) Id. 387 6. Forfeiture of wages-Desertion-What amounts to-Animus revertendi.-A master's wages may

SUBJECTS OF CASES.

be forfeited by desertion, but there can be no absolute desertion of his ship working a forfeiture of the whole of his wages if there be an animus revertendi upon the part of the master. (Adm.) Id.

page 387

7. Forfeiture of wages-Leaving ship for unreasonable time-Appointment of another masterRight to recover.-Where a master quits his ship and remains away for such a time and under such circumstances as leads his owners reasonably to suppose that he has no intention of returning, the owners will be justified in removing the vessel from the place where it is left, and appointing another master; and the original master will not be entitled to recover his wages for any period after the time when he so quitted the ship. (Adm.) Id.

8. Forfeiture of wages-Error of judgment-Negligence-Disobedience-No mala fides.-Where a master receives instructions to take the balance of freight due at the end of a voyage in cash, or by bank bill upon London, and, without sufficient inquiry, but without mala fides and rather through error of judgment, he takes a bill which he believes to be (but which is not) a bank bill, and which is afterwards dishonoured, causing loss to his owners, this negligence or disobedience, not being wilful, does not work a forfeiture of his wages, nor can the owners claim to deduct the amount of their loss from his wages. (Adm.) The Dunmore

387

509

104

9. Lien-Priority-Bottomry on ship freight and
cargo-Marshalling assets.-Where a master has
given a bottomry bond by which he has bound
ship, cargo, and freight, and himself personally
for the due execution of the bond, and the pro-
ceeds of the ship and freight alone are in-
sufficient to satisfy both the bond and the
master's claim for wages and disbursements, but
the proceeds of ship, cargo, and freight will
cover all, the High Court of Admiralty will
marshall the assets, so that the master shall be
paid in priority out of ship and freight, leaving
the bondholders to fall back upon the cargo for
the balance of their claim; the owners of cargo
cannot take themselves out of the operation of
this rule by becoming holders of the bond. The
Edward Oliver (2 Mar. Law Cas. O. S. 597)
followed. (Adm.) The Eugenie
10. Lien-Priority-Bottomry bondholder-Master
not personally bound.-Presuming a master to
have a lien upon his ship for wages and disburse-
ments, he is entitled to payment out of the pro-
ceeds of the ship in priority to a bottomry bond-
holder, provided that he, the master, has not
personally bound himself by the bond. (U.S.
Dist. Ct. East Dist. of N.Y.) The bark Irma
11. Practice-Admiralty Court-Costs-Detention
money and board.-In calculating, on taxation of
costs in a cause for the recovery of a master's
wages, the amount due to the master for de-
tention money and board whilst detained ashore
as a witness, the fact that he through his wife
carries on a business will not deprive him of his
right to be allowed detention money; but if he
lives at his place of business during his deten-
tion, the fact that he can live more cheaply at
home than elsewhere is to be taken into considera-
tion in fixing the amount to be allowed for sub-
sistence money. (Adm.) The Royal Family ... 421
MATERIAL MEN.

See Marine Insurance, No. 43-Mortgages, Nos.
1, 2-Necessaries.

MATES' RECEIPTS.

See Carriage of Goods, No. 31.

155

MEASUREMENT.

See Carriage of Goods, No. 6-Tonnage.

MEASURE OF DAMAGES. See Charter-party, No. 2.

MERCHANT SHIPPING ACTS. See Carriage of Goods, Nos. 33, 34, 35, 36Collision, Nos. 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31-Salvage, Nos. 6, 13-Tonnage.

MERSEY DOCKS ACT.

See Carriage of Goods, No. 37-Compulsory Pilotage, Nos. 5, 6, 7.

MERSEY, THE RIVER.

See Compulsory pilotage, Nos. 5, 6, 7-Navigable River, Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4.

MOORINGS.

See Collision, Nos. 32, 33-Navigable River, Nos. 1, 2, 4.

MORTGAGE.

See Marine Insurance, No. 44-Mortgagees.

MORTGAGEES.

1. Lien-Proceeding in rem-American law-Ap. pearance-Material men-Necessaries - Homeport-Priority.-Mortgagees have no maritime lien upon a ship upon which they hold a mortgage; and, according to United States' law, no remedy against the ship in rem in the admiralty courts, but may appear as respondents in a suit in rem, and set up their mortgage as the conditional owners of the ship, and claim that their mortgage is a legal lien on the ship prior in date to the attachment under the monition in a suit by material men for necessaries supplied in a home port, and also prior to the contract for the supply of the necessaries. (U. S. Dist. Ct. East Dist. of Wisconsin.) W. H. Wolf v. The Scow Selt..... page 107 2. Material men-Necessaries-Mutual knowledge of mortgagee and repairers-Distribution of proceeds. Where mortgagees know that repairs are being made on and necessaries supplied to a ship on which they hold a mortgage, whereby she is made a more valuable security, and the material men execute the repairs, &c., with a knowledge of the mortgage, but relying on their right to proceed in rem against the ship, the parties are entitled, upon principles of equity, to be placed upon an equality as to the distribution of the proceeds of sale of the ship. (U. S. Dist. Ct. East, Dist. of Wisconsin.) Id.

See Necessaries, No. 3.

MUTUAL MARINE INSURANCE ASSOCIATION.

See Marine Insurance Association.

NAUTICAL ASSESSORS. See Collision, No. 33.

NAVIGABLE RIVER.

1. Pier-Landing stage-Right to make-Local board-Admiralty.-By a local Act (27 & 28 Vict. c. cxvii.) the Wallasey Local Board are authorised for the purpose of their ferry between Liverpool and New Brighton, to make and maintain in accordance with certain deposited Parliamentary plans, a pier or landing stage at New Brighton, in the River Mersey, together with all such jetties,

107

SUBJECTS OF CASES.

esplanades, landing places, and other works and conveniences in connection therewith as the local board shall from time to time think fit, provided they deposit with the Admiralty plans of the landing stage and works connected therewith, and the same be approved by the Admiralty and are constructed in accordance with such plans. Under this section the local board have the right (already exercised) to make and maintain at the end of a permanent fixed pier, erected in accordance with the Act, a floating landing-stage below low-water mark, and to moor the same permanently to the bed of the river by anchors, whether the same be within the deposited plans or not, provided it be approved by the Admiralty. (C.P.) Joliffe v. The Wallasey Local Board ... page 146 2. Pier-Landing stage-Erection without statutable

authority-Nuisance-Obstruction.-Semble,that the erection in a navigable river, without statutory authority, of a floating landing stage, moored permanently by anchors fixed in the bed of the river, is a public nuisance and obstruction, which will entitle any one of the public using the river to recover against the erectors for any damage sustained therefrom. (C.P.) Id.

Anchors

3. Pier-Landing stage-Authority by statuteDuty of makers-Due care.-Persons authorised by statute to place in a navigable river anything which is an obstruction to the navigation thereof, are bound to exercise their powers with due care, and if the obstruction is of a character to injure the property of the public, to prevent such injury as far as possible. (C. P.) Id. 4. Pier Landing stage Moorings Buoys-Damage.-Semble, that persons laying down anchors as permanent moorings of a floating landing stage in a navigable river are bound to mark the positions of the anchors by means of sufficient buoys attached thereto, and that the neglect thereof will render them liable for damage occasioned by the anchors. (C. P.) Id. 5. Obstruction-Nuisance-Right to place.-No person has a right to put an obstruction in a navigable river, although at the time it be not a nuisance. (M. R. & L. JJ.) Attorney-General v. Terry

146

146

146

174, 217

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

1. Lien-Material men-Home port-Attaching of lien-Arrest.-Semble, that the lien of material men for necessaries supplied to a ship in her home port-that is, their right to be paid out of the res-attaches only on the seizure of the ship under admiralty process. (U. S. Dist. Ct., East. Dist. of Wisc.) W. H. Wolf v. The Scow Selt... 107 2. Lien-Material man-Necessary for voyageCoppering.-Where it is necessary that a wooden ship bound upon a particular voyage should be

[blocks in formation]

3. Lien-Priority-Advances of freight Ship's disbursements. An advance of freight to enable a master to pay his ship's disbursements before sailing does not give the charterer a claim against the ship, which will take precedence of the claim of a mortgagee; nor does an advance for a similar purpose made by an insurance company. (Adm.) The Turliani

4. Master's authority-Necessity-Absence of owner or authorized agent-Want of knowledge of presence of agent or owner.-The master of a ship has authority to pledge his owner's credit for money borrowed or for goods supplied by his (the master's) orders in a foreign port only where (1) it is necessary to borrow money for the prosecution of the enterprise, or the goods are reasonably necessary for the use of the ship; (2), where neither the owner or his duly authorised agent is at the port, nor within such distance that he can be reasonably expected to interfere. Want of knowledge of the presence of the owner or an agent on the part of the person supplying goods or money to a master will not entitle him to recover against the owner. (C. P.) Gunn v. Roberts

603

250

5. Practice U. S. law-Proceeding in rem-Lien. -A right to proceed in rem may exist, although there may be no maritime lien upon the res against which the claim is made. There is no maritime lien for necessaries supplied to a ship in her home port, and yet by the United States' rules of practice for Courts of Admiralty the material men may proceed in rem against the ship. (U. S. Dist. Ct. East. Dist. of Wisc.) W. H. Wolf v. The Scow Selt 107

See Mortgagees-Practice, No. 10.

NON-DELIVERY OF CARGO.

See Carriage of goods, Nos. 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 40, 42.

NOTICE OF ABANDONMENT. See Marine Insurance, Nos. 1, 20, 39, 46.

NOTICE OF ACTION.

See Practice, Nos. 11, 12.

NUISANCE.

See Navigable River, Nos. 5, 6, 7.

OBSTRUCTION TO NAVIGABLE RIVER. See Navigable River, Nos. 5, 6, 7.

ONUS OF PROOF.

See Carriage of Goods. Nos. 13, 14-Collision, No. 11.

OPEN POLICY.

See Marine Insurance, No. 4.

OUTPORT.

See Compulsory Pilotage, Nos. 2, 3, 4—
Practice, Nos. 13, 14.

OUTPORT CHARGES.
See Practice, Nos. 13, 14.

PACKAGES.

See Marine Insurance, Nos. 10, 11.

PARTIAL LOSS.

SUBJECTS OF CASES.

See Marine Insurance, Nos. 7, 10, 11, 12, 24, 25.

PARTICULAR AVERAGE.

See Marine Insurance, Nos. 12, 24, 25.

PARTICULARS.

See Practice, No. 15.

PART OWNERS.

See Co-owners-Master's Wages and Disbursements, Nos. 1, 2.

PASSING OF PROPERTY.

See Marine Insurance, Nos. 7, 8.

PERILS.

See Carriage of Goods, Nos. 9, 11, 13, 19, 20, 25, 40-Marine Insurance, Nos. 10, 11, 37, 38, 39.

PIER.

See Damage, Nos. 1, 2.

PILOT.

Compulsory pilotage-Fellow servant-Negligence of crew. A pilot compulsorily employed on board a ship is not a fellow servant of the crew of the ship, and consequently can recover against the owners of the ship for injury received by him through the negligence of the crew, their servants. (Q.B.) Smith v. Steele page 487 See Collision, Nos. 35, 36-County Courts Admiralty Jurisdiction, No. 3-Damage, Nos. 4, 5 -Salvage, No. 17.

PILOTAGE.

See Compulsory Pilotage.

PILOT, DUTY OF. See Collision, Nos. 35, 36.

PLEADING.

See Salvage, Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.

POLICY.

See Hypothecation-Marine Insurance, No. 4, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 37, 38, 45, 47, 48, 52, 53, 54.

PORT.

See Carriage of Goods, Nos. 27, 28.

PORTERS.

See Sale of Goods, No. 37.

PRACTICE.

1. Appeal-County Court-Arrest by Admiralty Court. Where plaintiffs appealed from a County Court in a cause in rem in which there has been a decree for the defendants and the ship has in consequence been released, the High Court of Admiralty will on the ex parte application of the plaintiffs order a warrant to issue for the detention of the ship till bail given or the appeal decided. Semble, that notice should be given before arrest to the defendants, so that they may come in and apply for the suspension of the warrant if they see fit. (Adm.) The Miriam.......

VOL. II. N. S.

259

2. Appeal Connty Court-Arrest by Admiralty Court. In an appeal by plaintiffs from a County Court in a cause in rem, in which there was a decree for the defendants, and the ship had in consequence been released, the High Court of Admiralty, on an ex parte application of the plaintiffs, ordered a warrant to issue for the detention of the ship, and, as the ship proceeded against was a foreign one, did not require notice of the intention to arrest to be given to the defendants. (Adm.) The Freir

...page 589

3. Appeal-County Court-Judge's notes of evidence -Shorthand writer-Conflict.-In an appeal to the High Court of Admiralty from a County Court where there is a conflict between the transcript of the notes of evidence and judgment taken by a shorthand writer in the County Court under the County Court Rules No. 32, and the County Court Judge's own notes, the version given by the County Court Judge must be accepted as binding, and if the County Court Judge alter the shorthand writer's notes so as to correspond with his own version, the Court of Admiralty will order the alterations so made to be carried into effect in the printed copies of the appendix. (Adm.) The Raithwaite Hall.......

4. Appeal-Privy Council-Question undecided below. Where the High Court of Admiralty has given no opinion on a question, which in the opinion of the Court of Appeal is a vital one in the cause, the Court of Appeal will decide that question on the evidence before them. (Priv. Co.) The C. M. Palmer; The Larnax

5. Arrest-Transfer from County Court-Arrest in High Court in other suits-Caveat to prevent release. Where an admiralty cause, instituted in rem against a ship, has been transferred from a County Court to the High Court of Admiralty, and no bail has been given in either court, and the ship is already under the arrest of the High Court in other suits, the High Court will order the issue of a caveat to prevent her release, in case the other causes should be withdrawn. (Adm.) The Rio Lima.

6. Arrest Ship under arrest of High Court-Arrest by County Court County Courts Admiralty Jurisdiction Acts.-Semble, that where a ship is under the arrest of the High Court, and causes are also instituted in the County Court against the ship, she should not be arrested by the County Court, as it is not probable that the ship will be removed out of the Jurisdiction of the County Court without satisfaction of the plaintiff's several claims, within the meaning of the County Court's Admiralty Jurisdiction Act 1868, sect. 22. (Adm.) The Turliani

7. Arrest-Ship under arrest in High Court-Arrest by County Court-Possession fees-Costs.-Where a ship, already under the arrest of the High Court of Admiralty, is arrested in an admiralty cause instituted in a County Court, the plaintiffs knowing of the previous arrest, and that cause is afterwards transferred to the High Court, the possession fees charged by the high bailiff in respect of the County Court arrest will not be allowed by the High Court upon taxation of plaintiff's costs. (Adm.) The Rio Lima

8. Discovery of documents-Affidavit required.-To obtain discovery of documents, the affidavit in support of the application must allege some one particular document to be in the possession of the party from whom discovery is sought. (Adm.) The Proceeds of the Cordelia..

9. Inspection of documents-H. M. ships-Reports by captain and officers to Admiralty-Privilege.Where a collision occurs between one of H. M. 2 U

210

94

34

603

143

35

SUBJECTS OF CASES.

..page 449

ships and a ship belonging to a private owner,
and the captain of H. M. ship makes (in accord-
ance with the usual practice) a report to the
Lords of the Admiralty, the High Court of
Admiralty will not, in a cause against the cap-
tain of H. M. ship, in which an appearance has
been entered by the Queen's Proctor by order of
the Lords of the Admiralty, order it to be pro-
duced for inspection by the opposite parties if the
Secretary to the Lords of the Admiralty makes
an affidavit to the effect that such production
would be prejudicial to the public service. (Adm.)
H.M.S. Bellerophon
10. Necessaries - Wages - Transfer from County
Court after decree-Reference to Registrar and
Merchants. Where causes of necessaries and
wages had been instituted against a ship in the
High Court, and other causes of necessaries in a
County Court against the same ship, and the
latter had been transferred after decree made to
the High Court for the purpose of enforcing the
decrees, the ship being under the arrest of the
High Court, the latter court ordered all the
causes to be referred to the registrar and mer-
chants to report the amount due thereon. (Adm.)
The Turliani

......

11. Notice of action-Local board-Public Health
Act, 1848.-A local board authorised by a local
Act to execute works out of their own district,
the Act to be "executed subject to the powers
and provisions" of the Public Health Act 1848,
are entitled under sect. 139 of the latter Act to
notice of action for anything done or intended
to be done under the powers of the local
Act. (C.P.) Jolliffe and another v. The Wal-
lasey Local Board

12. Notice of action-Non-feasance-Misfeasance.
-Notice of action must be given in a case of
non-feasance, just as much as in a case of mis-
feasance under the Act. Id.

13. Outport-Agency-Charges-Separate bills of
costs. The practice, which has hitherto obtained
in the High Court of Admiralty, of presenting
separate bills of costs for the London proctor's
own charges and for the outport or country
agency charges, is now objectionable and must be
discontinued for the future. (Adm.) The City
of Brussels

..........

[ocr errors]

603

146

146

102

14. Outport agency-Agent not solicitor-Not en-
titled to charge for solicitor's work.-Although a
proctor may employ an agent, who is not an at-
torney or solicitor, to act as clerk pro hac vice for
the purpose of collecting evidence in a cause, &c.,
in the outports, and may lawfully charge for the
expenses incurred in respect of such agent as
agency, charges made by such an agent for doing
work which is essentially the work of a proctor,
attorney, or solicitor such as taking instruc-
tions for brief and drawing the same," &c., will
not be allowed upon taxation. (Adm.) Id....... 102
15. Particulars-Negligence-Collision.-Where the
declaration in an action against the defendant for
negligent navigation of his ship, causing injury to
the plaintiff, contains only general allegations of
negligence on the part of the defendant in respect
of navigation, and of keeping the machinery and
the ship in good repair, the court will not require
the plaintiff to give particulars of matters which
he may suppose to constitute the negligence of the
defendant, because these matters are within the
knowledge of the defendant and his servants, and
not necessarily within the personal knowledge
of the plaintiff. (C.P.) George v. Watts
See Collision, Nos. 37, 38, 39, 40-Mortgages, Nos.
1, 2-Necessaries, No. 5-Sale of ship-Salvage,
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8.

243

PRINCIPAL AND AGENT.
See Broker's Lien-Marine Insurance, Nos. 29,
30.

PRIORITY.

See Master's Wages and Disbursements, Nos.
9, 10, 11-Mortgages-Necessaries, No. 3.

PRIVILEGE.

See Practice, No. 9.

QUANTITY AND QUALITY UNKNOWN.
See Carriage of Goods, Nos. 7, 24.

REFERENCE.

See Master's Wages and Disbursements, No.
2-Practice, No. 10.

REGISTRAR AND MERCHANTS.

See Master's Wages and Disbursements, No. 2
-Practice, No. 10.

REGULATIONS FOR PREVENTING COLLISIONS
AT SEA.

See Collision, Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 12, 19, 21, 22,
23, 24, 25, 27, 28, 29, 35, 31, 46.

RE-INSURANCE.

See Marine Insurance, Nos. 35, 36.

REPAIRS OF SHIP.

See Marine Insurance, No. 40.

REPAYMENT OF FREIGHT.
See Marine Insurance, No. 22.

RESTRAINT OF PRINCES.
See Marine Insurance, Nos. 37, 38, 39.
RISKS.

See Carriage of Goods, Nos. 20, 21, 22-Marine
Insurance, Nos. 37, 38, 39.

RIVER.

See Compulsory Pilotage-Navigable River.

RIVER NAVIGATION.

See Collision, Nos. 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47,
48.

SAILING SHIP.

See Collision, Nos. 2, 49.

SALE OF CARGO.

See Marine Insurance, No. 5.

SALE OF SHIP.
Contract abroad-Enforcement of in England.—
Where an Englishman has entered into a contract
abroad for the purchase of a ship then on her
voyage to this country to be taken possession of
by the purchaser immediately on delivery of the
cargo at any place to which she might be ordered,
the Court of Chancery has jurisdiction to enforce
the contract, and for that purpose to issue an in-
junction to restrain the removal of the ship from
the port of discharge, if within the jurisdiction.
Where the vendor is abroad, substituted service
of process upon the captain, the vendor's autho-
rised agent in this country, in charge of the ship
is sufficient. L.JJ.) Hart v. Herwig
page 63

See Marine Insurance, No. 46.

« SebelumnyaLanjutkan »