 | Leonard MacNally - 1802 - 316 halaman
...jurifdiction is evidence of any matter which came collaterally in queCtion, though within their jurifdiction ; nor of any matter incidentally cognizable; nor of any matter to be inferred by argument by the judgment. Upon the fubject of marriage, the fpiritual court has the fole and exclufive cognizance... | |
 | Thomas Peake - 1804 - 534 halaman
...jurifdietion is evidence of any matter which came collaterally in queftion, though within their jurifdiclion; nor of any matter incidentally cognizable; nor of...matter to be inferred by argument from the judgment. Judgments which are merely on queftions of property between party and party are, as A^e, 38. M7aselfe... | |
 | Robert Joseph Pothier - 1806 - 728 halaman
...jurifdidtion is evidence of any matter which came collaterally in queftion, though within their jurifdiction, nor of any matter incidentally cognizable, nor of any matter to be inferred by argument by the judgment. It was alfo the opinion of the judges, that, fuppofing the fcntence to be conclufive... | |
 | Thomas Bayly Howell - 1814 - 730 halaman
...is evidence, of any matter which came collaterally in question, though within their jurisdiction ; nor of any matter incidentally cognizable ; nor of any matter to be inferred by argument from tbe judgment Upon the subject of marriage, the Spiritual Court has the sole and exclusive cognizance... | |
 | Samuel March Phillipps - 1815 - 600 halaman
...not evidence of any matter, which came collaterally in question, though within their jurisdiction, nor of any matter incidentally cognizable, nor of...matter to be inferred by argument from the judgment. (2) But, although such sentences are conclusive, and cannot be impeached from within, yet, like all... | |
 | 1816 - 742 halaman
...is evidence, of any matter which came collaterally in question, though within their jurisdiction ; nor of any matter incidentally cognizable ; nor of...matter to be inferred by argument from the judgment. Upon the subject of marriage, the Spiritual Court has the sole and exclusive cognizance of questioning... | |
 | United States. Circuit Court (1st Circuit), John Gallison - 1817 - 624 halaman
...Harvey vs. Richards. matter, which came collaterally in question, though within their jurisdiction, nor of any matter incidentally cognizable, nor of...matter to be inferred by argument from the judgment." Now in the probate decree before the Court, there is no decision of the court directly upon any point... | |
 | Francis Buller - 1817 - 684 halaman
...is evidence of any matter which came collaterally in question, though within their jurisdiction, nur of any matter incidentally cognizable, nor of any matter to be inferred by agreement from the judgment. 11 Sta. Tri. 26l. Peakc's Ev. 75, 76. And although judgment on mere questions... | |
 | Matthew Hale - 1820 - 580 halaman
...jurisdiction, is evidence of any matter which came collaterally in question, though within their jurisdiction; nor of any matter incidentally cognizable; nor of...matter to be inferred by argument from the judgment. Upon the subject of marriage, the spiritual court has the sole and exclusive cognizance of questioning... | |
 | Samuel March Phillipps - 1820 - 838 halaman
...not evidence of any matter, which came collaterally in question, though within their jurisdiction, nor of any matter incidentally cognizable, nor of any matter to be inferred by argument from the judgment.(2) But, although such sentences are conclusive, and cannot be impeached from within, yet,... | |
| |
But neither the judgment of a concurrent or exclusive jurisdiction is evidence of any matter which came collaterally in question, though within their jurisdiction, nor of any matter incidentally cognizable, nor of any matter to be inferred by argument... 
