| 1872 - 978 halaman
...be that, " A communication made lona fide upon any subject-matter in -which the party communicating has an interest, or in reference to which he has a...contain criminatory matter, which without this privilege •wonid be slanderous and actionable. In the present case little need be said to shew that the communicator... | |
| 1873 - 962 halaman
...which the party communicating has an interest, or in reference to which he has, or honestly believes he has a duty, is privileged, if made to a person...having a corresponding interest or duty, although it contains criminatory matter which, without that privilege, would be defamatory and actionable. The... | |
| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1918 - 870 halaman
...extends to all communications made tona fide, upon any subject-matter in which the party communicating has an interest, or in reference to which he has a duty, to a person having a corresponding interest or duty. And the privilege embraces cases where the duty... | |
| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1890 - 816 halaman
...extends to all communications made bona fide upon any subject-matter in which the party communicating has an interest, or in reference to which he has a duty, to a person having a corresponding interest or duty; and embraces cases where the duty is not a legal... | |
| Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1889 - 810 halaman
...extends to all communications made bona fide upon any subject-matter in which the party communicating has an interest, or in reference to which he has a duty, to a person having a corresponding interest or duty. And the privilege embraces cases where the duty... | |
| Ireland. High Court of Chancery - 1858 - 656 halaman
...canon : " A communication made bona fide, upon any " subject-matter in which the party communicating has an interest, " or in reference to which he has...corresponding interest or duty, although " it contain criminating matter, which, without this privilege, " would be slanderous and actionable." The proceedings... | |
| New York (State). Court of Appeals, George Franklin Comstock, Henry Rogers Selden, Francis Kernan, Erasmus Peshine Smith, Joel Tiffany, Edward Jordan Dimock, Samuel Hand, Hiram Edward Sickels, Louis J. Rezzemini, Edmund Hamilton Smith, Edwin Augustus Bedell, Alvah S. Newcomb, James Newton Fiero - 1859 - 662 halaman
...was that " a communication made, bona fide, upon any subject matter in which the party communicating has an interest, or in reference to which he has a...this privilege would be slanderous and actionable." He added that "duty" in the proposed canon could not be confined to legal duties, but must include... | |
| Francis Hilliard - 1859 - 594 halaman
...communicating, or the party communicated with, has an interest, or in reference to which the former has a duty, is privileged, if made to a person having...privilege, would be slanderous and actionable. And it has even been held that a communication made bond fide for the purpose of obtaining redress was... | |
| Thomas Campbell Foster, William Francis Finlason - 1860 - 752 halaman
...follows : — "A communication made bond fide upon any subjectmatter in which the party communicating has an interest, or in reference to which he has a...this privilege, would be slanderous and actionable." Whether or not the occasion gives that privilege is a question of law for the Judge ; but whether the... | |
| |