...named John Smith might have a justiciable controversy with another John Smith. This illustrates that courts must look behind names that symbolize the parties...whether a justiciable case or controversy is presented. While this case is United States v. United States, et al., it involves controversies of a type which...

...named John Smith might have a justiciable controversy with another John Smith. This illustrates that courts must look: behind names that symbolize the...whether a justiciable case or controversy is presented. While this case is United States v. United States, et al., it involves controversies of a type which...

...named John Smith might have a justiciable controversy with another John Smith. This illustrates that courts must look behind names that symbolize the parties...whether a justiciable case or controversy is presented. While this case is United States v. United States, et al., it involves controversies of a type which...

...named John Smith might have a justiciable controversy with another John Smith. This illustrates that courts must look behind names that symbolize the parties...whether a justiciable case or controversy is presented. While this case is United States v. United States, et al., it involves controversies of a type which...

...named John Smith might have a justiciable controversy with another John Smith. This illustrates that courts must look behind names that symbolize the parties...whether a justiciable case or controversy is presented. While this case is United States v. United States, et al., it involves controversies of a type which...

...not depend on such a surface inquiry In United States v. ICC, 337 US 426 (1949), the Court observed, "courts must look behind names that symbolize the...whether a justiciable case or controversy is presented." Id., at 430. See also: Powell v. McCormack, 395 US 480 (1909); ZCC v. Jersey City, 322 US 503 (19-14)...

...of the Executive Branch. As the Supreme Court observed in United States v. ICC, 337 US 426 (1949), "courts must look behind names that symbolize the...whether a justiciable case or controversy is presented." Id. at 430, quoted in United States v. Nixon, 418 US at 693. Thus, in United States v. ICC, the Supreme...

...inquiry. In United States v. ICC, 337 US 426, 93 L Ed 1451, 69 S Ct 1410 (1949), the Court observed, "courts must look behind names that symbolize the...whether a justiciable case or controversy is presented." Id., at 430, 93 L Ed 1451. See also: Powell v. McCormack, 395 US 486, 23 L Ed 2d 491, 89 S Ct 1944...

...not depend on such a surface inquiry. In United States v. ICC, 337 US 426 (1949), the Court observed, "courts must look behind names that symbolize the...whether a justiciable case or controversy is presented." Id., at 430. See also: Powell v. McCormack, 395 US 486 (1969); ICC v. Jersey City, 322 US 503 (1944)...

...named John Smith might have a justiciable controversy with another John Smith. This illustrates that courts must look behind names that symbolize the parties...whether a justiciable case or controversy is presented. While this case is United States v. United States, et al., it involves controversies of a type which...