and the people the moft happy in the univerfe. I speak not of that part of the prefs which is under the controul of fectaries and republicans; from them fuch fentiments are ever to be expected: I alJude to publications which profefs great loyalty, and in which America is said to have “fhaken off the yoke," to have "gained her freedom," to have "fuccefsfully refifted unlawful controul," to have "emancipated herself," and to have "taken her place amongst the family of independent nations, of which fhe is the happiest fifter, and to which she is a bright example." Nay, a modern compiler, a Clergyman of the church of England, and Fellow too of St. Mary Magdalen College, Oxford, to be plain, the REVEREND ARTHUR HOMER, D. D. has, in his Proposals for publishing a Bibliotheca Univerfalis Americana, thought proper to reprefent GENERALWASHINGTON, the man who, while he bore a commiffion under his and Dr. HOMER'S Sovereign, was the very first in the Colony of Virginia to subscribe to a fund for raifing troops to fight against that Sovereign; the man who afterwards commanded the rebel army, who, in cold blood, and contrary to the laws of war, executed the gallant ANDRE; the man, in short, whofe fame refts on his having been the principal inftrument in cutting off an empire from the crown of Britain; this is the man whom the REVEREND ARTHUR HOMER has thought proper to reprefent as "the GREATEST and MOST VIRTUOUS character that the New World has ever produced;" and the Reverend Gentleman has the modefty to prefume, that in this his opinion, 66 every GOOD MAN and every LOYAL SUBJECT of this country will at prefent concur." The death of the greatest and most virtuous character that the New World has ever produced," induced Dr. HOMER to alter his propofals, in a new edition of which he propofes to dedicate his book to the BISHOP OF LANDAFF. It would feem, that the New World

C 2

World had not, in his opinion, produced a fecond character quite worthy of the honour, though, in beftowing it on my LORD of LANDAFF, the Reverend Gentleman, apparently fenfible that fome of the "worthy compeers" of Washington might think themselves flighted, takes an opportunity of paying them all a very handfome compliment. While the teachers of the nation openly promulgate opinions like thefe, it is both foolish and unjuft to complain of the progress of difloyalty. If DOCTOR HOMER were defirous to find a native of the New World worthy of the "mark of refpect" which he had to bestow, one would have thought that BISHOP INGLIS, COUNT RUMFORD, GENERAL DE LANCY, Judge LUDLOW, or fome other out of the long lift of brave and learned men, who abandoned their property and ventured their lives for their King, might have been preferred to a man, who, however his deeds may now be varnished over, will ever ftand as a traitor on the records of England.

The praises of the American Government form a never-ending fubject for almost every political publication that iffues from the British prefs. When the daring rebel PAINE infulted the nation with his eulogiums on the governments of France and America, and held forth his triumphant comparison between them and the Government of England, as far as related to that of France, he met with contradiction and expofure; but, as to that of America, which furnished much the most dangerous example, his falfehoods were fuffered to pafs as incontrovertible facts: even he, who was emphatically styled the father of lies, was prefumed to speak truth, when he fpoke in favour of America. When his Rights of Man appeared in the United States, even the Whigs themselves blufhed at his impudence; yet did the cowardly prefs of Great Britain, influenced partly by the fordid spirit of commerce, and partly by

the

the republican principles of its conductors, filently acquiefce in the correctnefs of his statements.

To England, the confequences of this fyftem of deception have been fuch as might have been expected. The people, as far as the nefarious influence of the prefs, and the ftill more nefarious influence of the fectarian pulpit, have reached, are firongly tinctured with republicanifm. They have loft much of the refpect which they formerly entertained for the Royal authority, and much of the abhorrence which they ought always to have preferved of rebellion against it. And where is the wonder? When the people fee fuch men as the EARL of BUCHAN and the MARQUIS of LANSDOWNE fend acrofs the Atlantic for the portrait of a notorious rebel, and exhibit it as the most precious piece in their cabinets; when the people hear a Reverend Doctor of the Church defcribe that rebel as the "greatest and most virtuous character that the New World has ever produced;" when they hear SIR JOHN SINCLAIR, with audacity unparalleled, call upon them not only to admire this rebel, but to contribute towards a fund for the raising of a monument to his memory, even in the dominions of their Sovereign, against whom he had rebelled; when they hear and see these things, who can blame them for thinking lightly of rebellion? Who can blame them for rebelling themselves? And if it be true, that the moft perfect Government, admininistered by men the most wife and most virtuous, and producing the greateft poffible degree of profperity and happiness, has refulted from a rebellion, and a rebellion too against GEORGE THE THIRD, what is the natural, the obvious, the inevitable conclufion?

This question I put to a gentleman in England, to whom I wrote in the year 1798. I pointed out to him the neceffity, not only of contradicting the captivating falfehoods, which were propagated with re

C 3

spect

fpect to America, but of appealing to the experience of that country for evidences against republican government, afferting, what I now repeat upon more perfect conviction, that the difaffection in the British dominions, particularly in Ireland, was chiefly to be afcribed to the deception with refpect to America, and that it was in vain to hope for a radical cure, till that deception was removed. I added, that I was aware of the arduoufnefs of the undertaking; but that, if it pleased God to fpare my life, I was refolved to attempt it.

This refolution I have now fulfilled. During a refidence in the United States of eight years, I wrote much upon the paffing events, and diligently collected whatever appeared to me calculated to exhibit the country, the government, and the people, in their true colours. These writings and felections I now fubmit to the world.

The arrangement which I have adopted, appeared to be the only one of which the materials would admit. I have begun with the pamphlets, and placed them according to their dates, down to the time when Porcupine's Gazette began. But as these pamphlets, in general, are confined each to a fingle fubject, the work, fo far, would have given but a very imperfect idea of the politics of the whole time during which it was written. To supply this defect, I have inferted between each pamphlet, fuch matter as forms an hiftorical sketch of the intermediate space, making the conclufion of each sketch a fort of introduction to the fucceeding pamphlet. These additions not only render the chain of events entire, but also ferve as a key to the pamphlets themselves, many parts of which, without fome fuch aid, must appear unintelligible to thofe who are not thoroughly acquainted with all the characters introduced, and who have not a perfect recollection of all the circumftances amidst which each pamphlet was first brought

2

forward

forward to the public. When I arrive at the epoch at which the Gazette commenced, I begin to make felections therefrom; rectifying, as I proceed, the errors which were committed through hafte or want. of correct information.

In general I have followed the chronological order; but fuch articles as I found divided, I have brought under one head; and whatever I thought neceffary to preserve of the proceedings of Congress, I have placed together under the date of the clofe of each feffion refpectively.

In order to render the work as complete and fatiffactory as poffible, I have prefixed to the firft volume a Summary View of the Politics of the United States, from the end of the American war, to the time when I began to write. This retrofpect will enable the reader to trace back to their efficient causes, that abfurd and unnatural partiality for France, that enthufiasm in her unjuft and impious cause, and all those novel, wild, and dangerous notions, to eradicate which, I fo long, and, notwithstanding appearances, fo fuccefsfully laboured. To the clofe of the work alfo, I have made confiderable additions. My laft American publication came down no later than April, 1800; but I have now added felections and remarks to complete the feries up to March, 1801.

So large and fo mifcellaneous a work certainly requires all the aid that mere editorfhip can afford. Each volume bears the date of the month and the year in the running title at the top of the page. Befides this, every volume has a table of its contents; the first volume contains a general table, and the laft volume a general and copious Index.

After all, however, it must be confeffed, that I present to the world neither a hiftory, nor a magazine, nor a journal; but fomething partaking of the nature of them all; a mass of matter, left to be feparated and digefted in the mind of the reader. It

*C4

will,