« SebelumnyaLanjutkan »
are told that Paul" came to Derbe and Lystra, and behold a certain disciple was there named Timotheus, the son of a certain woman which was a Jewess, and believed , but his father was a Greek.” In the epistle before us, in the first chapter and at the fifth verse, St. Paul - writes to Timothy thus:
Greatly desiring to see thee, being mindful of thy, tears, that I may be filled with joy, when I call to remembrance the unfeigned faith that is in thee, which dwelt first in thy grandmother Lois, and thy mother Eunice; and I am persuaded that in thee also.” Here we have a fair unforced example of coincid
In the history Timothy was the “ son of a Jewess that believed :” in the epistle St. Paul applauds“ the faith which dwelt in his mother Eunice.” In the history it is said of the mother, “ that she was a Jewess, and believed ;" of the father, “ that he was a Greek.” Now when it is said of the mother'alone " that she believed," the father being nevertheless mentioned in the same sentence, we are led to suppose of the father that he did not believe, i. e. either that he was dead, or that he remained unconverted. Agreeably hereunto, whilst praise is bestowed in the epistle upon one parent, and upon her sincerity in the faith, no notice is taken of the other. The mention of the grandmother is the addition of a circumstance not found in the history; but it is a circumstance which, as well as the names of the parties, might naturally be ex: pected to be known to the apostle, though overlooked by his historian.
No. III. Chap. ii. 15. “ And that from a child thou hast known the Holy Scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation.”
This verse discloses a circumstance which agrees exactly with what is intimated in the quotation from the Acts, adduced in the last number. In that quotation it is recorded of Timothy's mother, “, that she was a Jewess." This description is virtually, though, l-am satisfied, undesignedly, recognised in the epistle, when Timothy is reminded in it; “ that from a child he had known the Holy Scriptures:” “ The Holy Scriptures” undoubtedly meant the scriptures of the Old Testament. The expression bears that sense in every place in which it occurs. Those of the New had not yet acquired the narne, not to mention, that in Timothy's childhood, probably, none of them existed. In what manner then could Timothy have known “from a child”ithe Jewish scriptures, had he not been born, on one side or on both, of Jewish
parontage? Perhaps he was not less likely to be carefully instructed in them, for that his mother alone professed that religion.
Chap. ii. 22. “ Flee also youthful lusts, but follow righteousness, faith, charity, peace, with them that call on the Lord out of a
* Flee also youthfut lusts.” The suitableness of this precept to the
person to whom it is addressed, is gathered from 1 Tim. chap. iv. 12: “Letno man despise thy youth.” Nor do I deem the less of this coincidence, because the propriety resides in a single epithet; or because this one precept is joined with, and followed by, a train of others, not more applicable to Timothy than to any ordinary convert. It is in these transient and cursory allusions that the argument is best founded. When a writer dwells and rests upon a point in which some coincidence is discerned, it
be doubted whether he himself had not fabricated the conformity, and was endeavouring to display and set it off. But when the reference is contained in a single word, unobserved perhaps by most readers, the writer passing on to other sub jects, as unconscious that he had hit upon a correspondency, or, unsolicitous whether it were remarked or not, we may be pretty well assured that no fraud was exercised, no impoz sition intended,
Chapa ini. 10, 11. : “ But thou hast fully known my doctrine, manner of life, purpose, faith, long-suffering, charity, patience, persecutions, afflictions, which came unto me at Antioch, at Iconium, at Lystra; what per: secutions I endured ; but out of them all the Lord delivered me.”
The Antioch here mentioned was not Antioch the capital of Syria, where Paul and Barnabas resided “ a long time;" but Antioch in Pisidia, to which place Paul and Barnabas came in their first apostolic progress, and where Paul delivered a memorable discourse, which is preserved in the thirteenth chapter of the Acts. At this Antioch the history reates, that the “ Jews stirred up the devout and honourable women, and the chief men of
the city, and raised persecution against Paul and Barnabas, and expelled thein out of their coasts. But they shook off the dust of their feet against them, and came into. Iconium... And it came to pass in Iconium, that they went both together ipto the synagogue of the Jews, and so spake that a great multitude both of the Jews and also of the Greeks believed ; but the unbelieving Jews stirred up the Gentiles, and inade their minds evil-affected against the brethren. Long time therefore abode they speaking boldly in the Lord, which gave testimony unto the word of Iris grace, and granted signs and wonders to be done by their hands. But the multitude of the city was divided ; and part held with the Jews, and part with the apostles. And when there was an assault made both of the Gentiles and also of the Jews, with their rulers, to use them despitefully and to stone them, they were aware of it, and fled unto Lystra and Derbe, cities of Lycaonia, and unto the region that lieth round about, and there they preached the Gospel And there came thither certain Jews from Antioch and Iconium, who persuaded the people, and having stoned, Paul, drew him out of the city, supposing he had