Judicial Politics: Readings from JudicatureElliot E. Slotnick Rowman & Littlefield, 1999 - 648 halaman This anthology of more than seventy articles, published by the American Judicature Society, is distributed by Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. |
Dari dalam buku
Hasil 1-5 dari 52
Halaman 17
Maaf, isi halaman ini tidak dapat ditampilkan.
Maaf, isi halaman ini tidak dapat ditampilkan.
Halaman 20
Maaf, isi halaman ini tidak dapat ditampilkan.
Maaf, isi halaman ini tidak dapat ditampilkan.
Halaman 26
Maaf, isi halaman ini tidak dapat ditampilkan.
Maaf, isi halaman ini tidak dapat ditampilkan.
Halaman 28
Maaf, isi halaman ini tidak dapat ditampilkan.
Maaf, isi halaman ini tidak dapat ditampilkan.
Halaman 30
Maaf, isi halaman ini tidak dapat ditampilkan.
Maaf, isi halaman ini tidak dapat ditampilkan.
Isi
The American Constitutional System and the Role of the Supreme Court in the American Polity | 1 |
the emergence of an eclectic power | 3 |
the usurpation and democracy questions | 18 |
the case for judicial restraint | 30 |
the Supreme Courts proper and historic function | 35 |
Judges Judicial Selection Systems and Their Consequences | 41 |
a special report | 44 |
how voters explain their decisions | 47 |
Some thoughts on judicial restraint | 302 |
Some thoughts on the Supreme Courts workload | 308 |
does the Supreme Court need help? | 313 |
The Rehnquist Courts shrinking plenary docket | 330 |
Federal court reform should start at the top | 336 |
Internal Court Processes and Decisions on the Merits | 343 |
some views of lawyers and federal judges | 348 |
Justice Brennan and the institutionalization of dissent assignment | 359 |
How minority judges fare in retention elections | 60 |
picking judges under fire | 68 |
The voting behavior of President Clintons judicial appointees | 85 |
Magistrates Clerks and Judicial Support Staff | 89 |
developments affecting the federal district courts lower tier of judicial officers | 91 |
their roles and relationships with their judges | 99 |
is there a monster in the judicial closet? | 106 |
rebutting a presumption of sloth | 114 |
Lawyers and Legal Practices | 119 |
a critical evaluation | 121 |
Can the lawyer serve all three? | 129 |
Contingency fee lawyers as gatekeepers in the civil justice system | 132 |
Interest Groups | 140 |
constraints and choices | 142 |
amici curiae and Webster v Reproductive Health Services | 154 |
The amicus briefs in Webster v Reproductive Health Services | 167 |
Juries | 171 |
the decline of the American jury | 173 |
what social scientists know and do not know | 188 |
is it tilted toward death? | 196 |
Is the grand jury worth keeping? | 201 |
Curbing abuse of the grand jury | 208 |
The American Judiciary and the Politics of Representation | 210 |
the plaintiffs perspective | 212 |
the defendant states perspective | 218 |
whom does the Court represent best? | 221 |
Voting behavior and gender on the US courts of appeals | 230 |
The decision making of Clintons nontraditional judicial appointees | 237 |
Should there be affirmative action for the judiciary? | 239 |
Civil and Criminal Justice Processes | 244 |
exploring a hypothetical case | 246 |
the uses of discretion in regulating plea bargaining | 260 |
steps forward steps backward | 269 |
Are repeat offender laws having their anticipated effects? | 274 |
what evidence is there that race influences results in the criminal justice system? | 280 |
The impact of the Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 | 283 |
Appellate Court Processes Access and Docketing Decisions | 288 |
how the Supreme Court sets its agenda | 291 |
The spirit of dissent | 368 |
an analysis of natural courts and reversal trends | 374 |
friendship and lobbying on the Court | 383 |
Freshman opinion writing on the US Supreme Court 19211991 | 394 |
affirmation not reversal | 401 |
Assessing the conservatism of the Rehnquist Court | 407 |
Explaining transformations in Supreme Court policy | 415 |
The Courts and Their Publics Public Opinion and the Media | 422 |
a historical perspective | 424 |
Shall we dance? The courts the community and the news media | 432 |
The Supreme Court decided today or did it? | 445 |
Supreme Court and public support for rights claims | 454 |
Public perception of the Supreme Court in the 1990s | 462 |
The cornerstone of judicial independence | 466 |
Courts Congress and the Presidency | 473 |
The Senates confirmation role in Supreme Court nominations and the politics of ideology versus impartiality | 475 |
too much advice and too little consent | 490 |
a view from the Senate | 493 |
the unforeseen impact on courts and Congress | 508 |
the view from the Hill and the federal bench | 513 |
States and State Courts | 521 |
state constitutions and state courts | 523 |
State supreme court commitment to state law | 538 |
Alternatives to Traditional Litigation | 548 |
Arbitration vs mediationexplaining the differences | 550 |
looking to the future | 559 |
Rethinking barriers to legal practice | 572 |
How are courts handling pro se litigants? | 577 |
Judicial Policy Making and Judicial Independence in the United States | 587 |
stability and change in 200 years | 590 |
judicial imperialism revisited | 600 |
The Judge Baer controversy | 610 |
Political attacks on the judiciary | 617 |
Reining in the federal judiciary | 626 |
Why they fail | 633 |
Contributors | 640 |
Istilah dan frasa umum
abortion Amendment American amici appointed arbitration argued attorneys behavior Brennan briefs Burger Court candidates cert cert pool certiorari Chief Justice cial Circuit civil rights Clinton Congress conservative constitutional contests court decisions Court of Appeals crime criminal decided democratic dispute dissent docket eral evidence federal courts federal law framers Frankfurter grand jury groups hearings Hispanic important involved issues JUDICATURE judicial restraint judicial review judiciary jurisdiction jurors law clerks lawyers legislative liberal litigation lower court majority mediation ment Nesson nominee NOTES This article O'Connor opinion oral argument party percent plea bargaining political preme Court pro se problem prosecutors question reasons recent Reed Rehnquist Court reported responses result role rules selection Senate sentencing sion staff stare decisis supra supra n Table term tice tion tive trial U.S. Supreme Court voir dire voters votes Warren