June 9, 1952.

343 U.S.

Rehearing Denied.

No. 35. CARLSON ET AL. V. LANDON, DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE; and No. 136. BUTterfield, DistRICT DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, v. ZYDOK, 342 U. S. 524. Petition for rehearing denied. The motion of petitioner Carlson to stay issuance of the mandate, insofar as applicable to him, pending his trial in United States v. Schneiderman et al., is granted to permit his attendance at his trial which is now in progress in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. This stay will be automatically dissolved when Carlson's case is submitted to the jury or when it is finally decided by the trial court, whichever is the sooner. MR. CHIEF JUSTICE VINSON, MR. JUSTICE REED, and MR. JUSTICE MINTON dissent from the order granting the stay.

No. 118. BEAUHARNAIS V. ILLINOIS, ante, p. 250; No. 717. OSBORNE ET AL. v. PURDOME, SHERIFF, ante, p. 953;

No. 722. TOM'S EXPRESS, INC. ET AL. v. DIVISION OF STATE HIGHWAY PATROL, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS, OF OHIO, ante, p. 944;

No. 232, Misc. RUTLEDGE v. HUDSPETH, WARDEN, ET AL., ante, p. 953;

No. 472, Misc. RUTLEDGE V. HUDSPETH, WARDEN, ante, p. 954;

No. 289, Misc. BOWEN v. UNITED STATES, ante, p. 943;

No. 326, Misc. LEVITON ET AL. v. UNITED STATES, ante, p. 946;

No. 427, Misc. JONES v. CITY OF NORFOLK, ante, p. 943; and

No. 447, Misc. SKLADD V. MICHIGAN, ante, p. 951. Petitions for rehearing denied.

No. 75. MOFFETT, EXECUTRIX, v. COMMERCE TRUST Co. ET AL., 342 U. S. 818. Motion for leave to file a second petition for rehearing denied.

No. 542. CREAMETTE COMPANY V. CONLIN ET AL., 342 U. S. 945. Motion for leave to file petition for rehearing denied.

No. 30, Misc. ASPERO v. MEMPHIS AND SHELBY COUNTY BAR ASSN., 342 U. S. 836. Motion for leave to file a second petition for rehearing denied.

1

INDEX

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW. See also Constitutional Law, I, 1; II,

2; V, 2; Jurisdiction, I, 3-5; II, 2-3; III; Transportation, 1–3.
Administrative interpretation of statute-Effect.-Administrative
interpretation of Internal Revenue Code as entitled to substantial
weight. Lykes v. United States, 118.

ADMIRALTY.

-

See also Government Employees.

clause

-

1. Collision - "Both-to-Blame"
Validity. "Both-to-
Blame" clause in ocean bill of lading invalid under rule forbidding
common carrier to stipulate against own negligence; rule not altered
by Harter Act or Carriage of Goods by Sea Act; power to change
rule is in Congress, not shipowners. United States v. Atlantic Mu-
tual Ins. Co., 236.

2. Seamen-Wages-Set-off-In proceeding by seaman to recover
wages, employer may not set off costs of care of crew member un-
justifiably attacked by seaman during voyage. Isbrandtsen Co. v.
Johnson, 779.

ALABAMA. See Elections.

ALIENS. See Constitutional Law, V, 6; Procedure, 1; Trading
with the Enemy Act; Treason.

ALLEGIANCE. See Treason.

ALLIED HIGH COMMISSION. See Jurisdiction, I, 2.
AMICUS CURIAE.

Amicus curiae briefs-Rule as to filing-Government practice.—
On Lee v. United States (Memorandum of FRANKFURTER, J.), 924.
ANTITRUST ACTS. See also Constitutional Law, V, 4; Federal
Power Act.

1. Violations-Injunction-Prepaid medical plans.-Sherman Act
suit against Oregon medical societies and doctors to enjoin alleged
violations arising out of conduct in relation to prepaid medical plans,
properly dismissed for insufficiency of evidence; function of this
Court on review; findings. United States v. Oregon State Medical
Society, 326.

2. Violations-Injunction-Decree.-Violations of Sherman Act in
distribution and licensing of machinery for making concrete blocks;
provisions of decree; patent licenses; leases; royalties; function of
trial and appellate courts relative to framing decree. Besser Mfg.
Co. v. United States, 444.

991

ANTITRUST ACTS-Continued.

Price discriminations

3. Clayton Act
Enforcement order.-
Order of Commission forbidding unlawful price discriminations
among customers by manufacturer of roofing materials, sustained;
reasonableness of provisions of order; effect of failure of order to
except lawful differentials; violation or threatened violation of order
as prerequisite to judicial enforcement. Federal Trade Comm'n v.
Ruberoid Co., 470.

APPEAL. See Administrative Law; Antitrust Acts; Criminal
Law, 3; Jurisdiction; Procedure; Treason; Trial.

ARMED FORCES. See Jurisdiction, I, 2; Treason.

ASSAULT. See Admiralty, 2.

ASSESSMENT. See Constitutional Law, I, 3; IV; Taxation.
ATTORNEYS. See Constitutional Law, V, 8-11; Contempt; Taxa-
tion, 3.

BANKRUPTCY.

Reorganization proceedings-Railroads.-Memorandum of FRANK-
FURTER, J., in connection with denial of certiorari in case involving
reorganization of Missouri Pacific system. Chemical Bank Co. v
Group of Investors, 982.

BOTH-TO-BLAME CLAUSE. See Admiralty, 1.

BRIEFS. See Amicus Curiae.

BROADCASTING.

Public Utilities.

See Constitutional Law, III; Evidence, 1;

BURDEN OF PROOF. See Constitutional Law, V, 9-11; Crimi-
nal Law, 2; Evidence, 2; Transportation, 2.

BUSSES. See Public Utilities.

CALIFORNIA. See Constitutional Law, IV; V, 10; Jurisdiction,
II, 6-7.

CANDIDATES. See Elections.

CARRIAGE OF GOODS BY SEA ACT. See Admiralty, 1.

CARRIERS. See Admiralty, 1; Bankruptcy; Constitutional Law,
IV; Public Utilities; Transportation.

CENSORSHIP. See Constitutional Law, II, 3.

CERTIORARI. See Bankruptcy; Jurisdiction, II, 8-9.

CITIZENSHIP. See Jurisdiction, I, 2; Treason.

CIVIL PROCEDURE. See Constitutional Law, V, 4; Procedure, 1.