The Federal Reporter

VII. REMEDIES OF SELLER. (E) Actions for Price or Value. 353(4) (U.S.C.C.A.Kan.) Complaint held to state cause of action for price of furnace sold, and sufficiency could not be raised after issue joined.-El Dorado Refining Co. v. Lientz, 7 F. (2d) 814.

354 (2) (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Plaintiff not bound to pay attention to or discern plea of payment in meaningless denial of information and belief.-Jessoph Co. v. Briggs & Turivas, 7 F. (2d) 883.

American port governed by United States laws. -The Apurimac, 7 F. (2d) 741.

II (U.S.D.C.Cal.) Obligations owing by master to seaman stated; breach gives seaman injured thereby an alternative right in rem or personam.-Cresci v. Standard Fisheries, 7 F. (2d) 378.

19 (U.S.D.C.Tex.) Discharge of seaman, pacitating him, does not release ship or its owncompelled to leave post through illness incaers.-Enochasson v. Freeport Sulphur Co., 7 F. (2d) 674.

Seaman, incapacitated during "voyage" by ill

359 (1) (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Prima facie case made by evidence in seller's action for price.-ness, held entitled to recover wages to end of Jessoph Co. v. Briggs & Turivas, 7 F. (2d) 883.

(F) Actions for Damages.

384(1) (U.S.C.C.A.Pa.) Buyer rescinding contract held liable for interest on recovery.Hartmann-Schneider Co. v. Farish Co., 7 F. (2d) 561.

384(2) (U.S.C.C.A.Tenn.) Measure of damages for breach of contract for purchase of peaches by buyer, stated.-Gentile Bros. Co. v. Rose, 7 F((2d) 879.

VIII. REMEDIES OF BUYER. (C) Actions for Breach of Contract. 418(3) (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Damage for breach of sales contract difference between market value and contract price. American Mfg. Co. v. U. S. Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation, 7 F. (2d) 565.

IX. CONDITIONAL SALES.

contract.-Id.

29(1) (U.S.D.C.Cal.) Failure of captain of boat to attempt to rescue member of crew known to have fallen overboard held negligence.-Salla v. Hellman, 7 F. (2d) 953.

Negligence of captain of boat is imputable to owner.-Id.

29(1) (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Fact that vessel is victualed, manned, and controlled by any person may fix liability of that person as charterer. -Stewart v. U. S. Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation, 7 F.(2d) 676.

Vessel bound to indemnify steward for injuries suffered by him in obeying orders.-Id.

to furnish

29(1) (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Suit in rem for injury through unseaworthiness of vessel maintainable, though case be governed by British 29(2) (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Failure law. The Navarino, 7 F. (2d) 743. ample provisions for voyage rendered ship unseaworthy and owner responsible for damages resulting therefrom.-Stewart v. U. S. Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation, 7 F.(2d) 676.

450 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Conditional sale never raises a question of lien, but one of title.29 (2) (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Vessel held unseaIn re Master Knitting Corporation, 7 F. (2d)

11.

457 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Transaction held to constitute a "conditional sale," notwithstanding use of phrase "on consignment" on a subsequent informal memorandum of delivery. In re Master Knitting Corporation, 7 F. (2d) 11.

SALVAGE.

I. RIGHT TO COMPENSATION.

17 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Libelant must show it contributed to successful result.-Lincoln S. S. Line v. U. S., 7 F. (2d) 886.

II. AMOUNT AND APPORTIONMENT.

31 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Award of salvage for beaching and flooding steel ship reduced from $31,250 to $15,000, plus expenses and costs of District Court.-Canadian Government Merchant Marine v. U. S., 7 F. (2d) 69.

III. LIEN AND RECOVERY.

48 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Allegation that stranded vessel floated immediately after libelant's efforts to free her held not established.-Lincoln S. S. Line v. U. S., 7 F. (2d) 886.

Libelant must show it contributed to successful result by preponderance of evidence.Id.

Preponderance of proof held not to show that libelant's effort contributed to rescue of stranded vessel.-Id.

49 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Whether libelant contributed to successful result in attempting to free stranded vessel held question of fact.Lincoln S. S. Line v. U. S., 7 F. (2d) 886.

SEAMEN.

3 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Injury to seaman in American port on foreign vessel through unseaworthiness governed by American law. The Navarino, 7 F. (2d) 743.

worthy by reason of defective block used during cleaning of smoke box tubes.-The Navarino, 7 F. (2d) 743.

29(4) (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Failure of steward to properly clothe himself for journey from icebound vessel held negligence contributing to injury.-Stewart v. U. S. Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation, 7 F. (2d) 676.

$6,500 for permanent loss of hearing of steward of vessel held proper.-Id.

29(4) (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Fireman held not responsible for selection of defective block for cleaning smoke box tubes.-The Navarino, 7 F. (2d) 743.

~ 29 (4) (U.S.D.C.Va.) Contributory negligence not bar to recovery for injury to seaman from maritime tort.-The Apurimac, 7 F. (2d) 741.

29 (5) (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Evidence held to sustain finding that deafness of steward was caused by exposure while obeying orders of vessel's master.-Stewart v. U. S. Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation, 7 F. (2d) 676. Limitation of Suits in Admiralty Act, March 9, 1920, § 5, held inapplicable.-Id.

SEARCHES AND SEIZURES.

3 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Propriety of seizure may be raised by motion to vacate.-U. S. v. Specified Quantities of Intoxicating Liquors, 7 F. (2d) 835.

3 (U.S.D.C.La.) Statute held not to change law as to right to arrest a person or enter his dwelling without a warrant, if he is committing an offense in presence of officers.-U. S. v. Lind. sly, 7 F.(2d) 247.

3 (U.S.D.C.Wash.) Search not made lawful by what is found.-U. S. v. Olmstead, 7 F. (2d) 760.

7 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Federal Constitution does not protect citizens against unreasonable searches by state government and its agencies. -Schroeder v. U. S., 7 F. (2d) 60.

3 (U.S.D.C.Va.) Right to lien for injury to 7 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Federal officers not necforeign seaman on foreign unseaworthy ship in essarily required to have search warrant to

For cases in Dec.Dig. & Am.Dig. Key-No.Series & Indexes see same topic and KEY-NUMBER

justify search and seizure.-Greenberg v. U. S.,
7 F. (2d) 65..

7 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Const. U. S. Amend. 4,
held inapplicable, where seizure of liquor was
by state police officer.-Katz v. U. S., 7 F. (2d)
67.

Em7 (U.S.D.C.Wash.) Constitutional right
not waived by submission to search.-U. S. v.
Olmstead, 7 F. (2d) 760.
Documents of one defendant, wrongfully
seized on search of his premises, admissible
against coindictees.-Id.

SENTENCE.

See Criminal Law, 978-994.

SHIPPING.

See Salvage; Wharves.

I. REGULATION IN GENERAL.

16 (U.S.C.C.A.Mass.) Not all places on
high seas are foreign to United States within
forfeiture statutes.-The Esther M. Rendle, 7
F. (2d) 545.

Tug towing lighter to ship at sea held not
making "foreign voyage."-Id.

Knowledge of owner that tug was being used

to defraud United States revenue held immate-
rial.-Id.

General allegation of violation of United
States customs law held sufficient.-Id.
Allegation that tug transported liquor loaded
on lighter held sufficient.-Id.

II. TITLE.

33 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Mortgage not invali-
dated as preferred because of collector's failure
to indorse it on ship's papers.-The Northern
Star, 7 F. (2d) 505.

III. CHARTERS.

41 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Time charter held not
to make charterer owner.-The Capitaine
Faure, 7 F. (2d) 131.
49(2) (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Charter party for
lumber, providing that any reduction in con-
ference freight rates on lumber should apply
to charter party, construed.-U. S. v. Cargo of
Lumber on the Springfield, 7 F.(2d) 306.

50 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Charterer, under char-
ter not constituting him owner, lacked authority
to bind ship.-The Capitaine Faure, 7 F.(2d)
131.

Acts of master of ship held not ratification by
ship of contract of charterer for use of pier.

-Id.

V. LIABILITIES OF VESSELS AND OWN-
ERS IN GENERAL.

79 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Contractor placing barge
in place of danger held liable for all damages
sustained by it.-The Montserrat, 7 F.(2d) 477.

86 (2) (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Steamship listing
with falling tide held not liable for damages to
barge, squeezed between steamship and hoist.
-The Montserrat, 7 F. (2d) 477.

VII. CARRIAGE OF GOODS.
121(2) (U.S.C.C.A.Cal.) "Seaworthiness"
defined.-The Newport, 7 F.(2d) 452.

125 (U.S.D.C.Cal.) General liberty clause
to be given effect, when not conflicting with
law or real intent of contract.-W. R. Grace &
Co. v. Toyo Kisen Kabushiki Kaisha, 7 F. (2d)
889.

In view of liberty clause, held no deviation
herein of which shipper might complain.—Id.

125 (U.S.D.C.Cal.) Deviation held not with-
in authority of liberty clause.-Rosenberg Bros.
& Co. v. U. S. Shipping Board Emergency Fleet
Corporation, 7 F. (2d) 893.

131 (U.S.D.C.Cal.) Unauthorized deviation
deprives carrier of benefit of insurance clause.
-Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. U. S. Shipping
Board Emergency Fleet Corporation, 7 F. (2d)
$93.

Value at destination measure of damages for
failure to deliver.-Id.

132(1) (U.S.D.C.Cal.) Shipper, to sue car-
rier after deviation, need not have been de-
prived of right against insurer.-Rosenberg
Bros. & Co. v. U. S. Shipping Board Emergency
Fleet Corporation, 7 F.(2d) 893.

must
132(3) (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Ship
show
damage to shipment was from cause excusing
it. The Samland, 7 F. (2d) 155.

132(5) (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Ship held to have
failed to show freezing in refrigerator compart-
ments not due to negligence of those charged
with control of temperatures.-The Samland, 7
F. (2d) 155.

136 (U.S.C.C.A.Cal.) Harter Act strictly
construed. The Newport, 7 F. (2d) 452.

137 (U.S.C.C.A.Cal.) Owner charged with
duty to furnish seaworthy vessel.-The New-
port, 7 F. (2d) 452.

Vessel held not reasonably fit to carry cargo
she had undertaken to support.-Id.

137 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Negligence in control
of temperatures in refrigerator compartments
Harter Act.-The Samland, 7 F. (2d) 155.
not as to management of vessel excused by

VIII. CARRIAGE OF passengers.

54 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Contractor held under
facts not liable for failing to put out fire on
scow.-O'Brien Bros. v. City of New York, 7166(1) (U.S.C.C.A.Wash.) Contract
F. (2d) 485.

Liability of one hiring vessel as bailee stated.
-Id.
City held under facts not liable for negligence
in failing to put water on fire in scow.-Id.

54 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Manner of loading coal

barge held to have been cause of her sinking.-
Kelly v. Overseas Shipping Co., 7 F. (2d) 732.
Sinking of barge held to have been due to neg-
ligent manner of loading coal thereon from sea-
going barge.-Id.

58 (2) (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Burden of proving
city's negligence for fire on scow carrying rub-
bish held to rest on libelant.-O'Brien Bros. v.
City of New York, 7 F. (2d) 485.

58(2) (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Duty of showing
barge seaworthy when offered for loading was
on libelant.-Kelly v. Overseas Shipping Co., 7
F. (2d) 732.

Barge held to have been seaworthy when of
fered for loading.-Id.

IV. MASTER.

61 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Owner acts through
ship's master.-Canadian Government Merchant
Marine v. U. S., 7 F. (2d) 69.

obli-

sault of its servants.-Pacific S. S. Co. v. Sut-
gation of carrier to protect passenger from as-
ton, 7 F.2d) 579.

166(2) (U.S.C.C.A.Wash.) Condition that
by not pleading.-Pacific S. S. Co. v. Sutton,
passenger must present claim in 10 days waived
7 F. (2d) 579.

Under facts, condition of ticket for present-
ing written claim of damages unreasonable and
not binding.-Id.

IX. DEMURRAGE.

181 (U.S.) Charterer held not liable for
demurrage. (C. C. A. Pa.) U. S. v. Kemmerer,
7 F. (2d) 187; (D. C.) Id., 7 F. (2d) 184.

XI. LIMITATION OF OWNER'S LIABILITY,
209 (1) (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Action at law for
injury to or death of seaman enjoinable in lim-
itation of liability proceeding.-El Mundo, 7
F. (2d) 1005.

209(2) (U.S.D.C.Va.) Right to limit liabil-
ity for damage to shipper on its vessel under
charter held lost by its course of action.-The
Moosabee, 7 F. (2d) 501.

209 (3) (U.S.C.C.A.Cal.) Burden devolves
on owner to prove seaworthiness of vessel, or
due diligence to make her so.-The Newport,
7 F. (2d) 452.

209 (3) (U.S.D.C.La.) General denials in
answer to owner's petition for exoneration
from, or limitation of, liability held sufficient.-
In re Companhia De Navegacao Lloyd Brasil-
eiro, 7 F. (2d) 238.

law," to include other than federal officers,
would require unambiguous language.-The Ray
of Block Island, 7 F. (2d) 189.

217 (U.S.D.C.La.) Courts not bound, in in-
terpreting law, by language used by a commit-
tee of Congress.-U. S. v. Lindsly, 7 F. (2d) 247.
(B) Particular Classes of Statutes.

Burden of proof on issue of limitation of lia-245 (U.S.C.C.A.Conn.) Tax statutes
bility on petitioner; on issue of liability on
claimant.-Id.

SPECIAL LAWS.

See Statutes, 77-96.

SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE.

II. CONTRACTS ENFORCEABLE.
51 (U.S.C.C.A.III.) Court of equity will not
lend its aid to enforce contracts which shock
conscience. In re Chicago Reed & Furniture
Co., 7 F. (2d) 885.

STATUTE OF FRAUDS.

See Frauds, Statute of.

STATUTES.

For statutes relating to particular subjects, see
the various specific topics.

I. ENACTMENT, REQUISITES, AND VA-
LIDITY IN GENERAL.

64 (2) (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Provisions as to rate
for and standard of gas not separable.-Brook-
lyn Union Gas Co. v. Prendergast, 7 F. (2d) 628.
64 (8) (U.S.D.C.Conn.) Even if part of film
registration act were invalid, held it would not
impair rest of statute.-Fox Film Corporation
v. Trumbull, 7 F. (2d) 715.

II. GENERAL AND SPECIAL OR LOCAL

LAWS.

77(1) (U.S.C.C.A.Okl.) Law not special
and local, if affecting all persons in like cir-
cumstances in the same manner; "special and
local law."-St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.
v. Bledsoe, 7 F. (2d) 364.

Supposed necessity of act to avoid consti-
tutional inhibition against local or special laws
must be practical, and special situation must
possess characteristics impossible of treatment
by general legislation.-Iả.

96 (2) (U.S.C.C.A.Okl.) Oklahoma statute,
providing for annexation of Ft. Sill school dis-
trict, held a local and special law, in violation
of Constitution.-St. Louis-San Francisco Ry.
Co. v. Bledsoe, 7 F. (2d) 364.

V. REPEAL, SUSPENSION, EXPIRATION,
AND REVIVAL.

149 (U.S.D.C.N.Y.) Power of Legislature,
to authorize commission to contract as to rates
of public utility, limited by considerations that
one Legislature cannot control subsequent one
in its exercise.-Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v.
Prendergast, 7 F. (2d) 628.

VI. CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION.
(A) General Rules of Construction.
183 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Intention of statute
ascertained, where literal interpretation may
lead to absurdity and fail to express real intent
of Legislature.-City of New York v. Davis,
7 F. (2d) 566.

195 (U.S.C.C.A.N.Y.) Courts not governed
by maxim of construction, when to apply it
would defeat accomplishment of manifest pur-
pose of the act.-City of New York v. Davis, 7
F. (2d) 566.

con-

strued in favor of taxpayer in case of doubt.-
Eaton v. English & Mersick Co., 7 F. (2d) 54.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

199 (U.S.D.C.R.I.) To construe federal
statute, imposing duty on "any officer of the § 274b

For cases in Dec.Dig. & Am.Dig. Key-No.Series & Indexes see same topic and KEY-NUMBER

PENAL CODE.

See Criminal Code.

STATUTES AT LARGE.

917

1789, Sept. 24, ch. 20, 1 Stat. 73.....
1875, March 3, ch. 145, § 1, 18 Stat. 479.. 796
1882, May 6, ch. 126, § 1, 22 Stat. 58.
Amended 1884, July 5, ch. 220, 23 Stat.
115

.....

311
831
311

1883, March 3, ch. 143, 22 Stat. 625.
1884, July 5, ch. 220, 23 Stat. 115.......
1887, Feb. 4, ch. 104, 24 Stat. 379. See
Interstate Commerce Act.
1888, Aug. 13, ch. 866, 25 Stat. 433... 511
1890, July 2, ch. 647, 26 Stat. 209...1, 481, 944
1890, July 2, ch. 647, § 1, 26 Stat. 209... 734
1891, March 3, ch. 561, § 7, 26 Stat. 1098 624
1892, July 23, ch. 234, 27 Stat. 260... 887
1893, Feb. 9, ch. 74, 27 Stat. 434.
954
1893, Feb. 13, ch. 105, 27 Stat. 445.
889
1893, Feb. 13, ch. 105, § 3, 27 Stat.
445
...155, 452
1895, Feb. 26, ch. 131, § 3, 28 Stat. 684.. 519
1897, Jan. 30, ch. 109, 29 Stat. 506..
887
1897, June 7, ch. 4, § 1, art. 16, 30 Stat. 99. 990
1897, June 7, ch. 4, § 1, art. 18, rule 9, 30
Stat. 100

1898, July 1, ch. 541, 30 Stat. 544. See
Bankruptcy Act.

990

1902, June 17, ch. 1093, 32 Stat. 388..... 624
1903, Feb. 5, ch. 487, § 10, 32 Stat. 799... 682
1905, Feb. 20, ch. 592, § 5, 33 Stat. 725.. 967
1906, June 29, ch. 3592. § 4(2), 34 Stat. 596 380
1906, June 29, ch. 3592, § 15, 34 Stat. 601 728
1906, June 30, ch. 3934, 34 Stat. 814.. 581
1908, April 22, ch. 149, 35 Stat. 65...269, 1010
1909, March 4, ch. 321, 35 Stat. 1088.

See Criminal Code.

1909, Aug. 5, ch. 6, § 38, 36 Stat. 112... 3
1910, June 23, ch. 373, §§ 1-3. 36 Stat. 604 626
1910, June 25, ch. 387, 36 Stat. 819.
Amended 1913, Jan. 23, ch. 9, 37 Stat.
650

1917, Oct. 6, ch. 106, §§ 8, 9, 40 Stat. 418,
419

1917, Oct. 6, ch. 106, § 9, 40 Stat. 419.
Amended 1919, July 11, ch. 6, § 1, 41
Stat. 35; 1920, June 5, ch. 241, 41 Stat.
977; 1921, Feb. 27, ch. 76, 41 Stat. 1147;
1921, Dec. 21, ch. 13, 42 Stat. 351; 1922,
Dec. 27, ch. 13, 42 Stat. 1065.

443

293

1918, March 21, ch. 25, § 10, 40 Stat. 456.. 622
1918, May 25, ch. 86, § 1, 40 Stat. 563... 887
1919, Feb. 24, ch. 18, 40 Stat. 1057.. 146
1919, Feb. 24, ch. 18, 40 Stat. 1057. Re-
pealed 1921, Nov. 23, ch. 136, 42 Stat.
227

1919, Feb. 24, ch. 18, § 200, 40 Stat.
1058

478

900

1919, Feb. 24, ch. 18, § 201a, 40 Stat. 1059 54
1919, Feb. 24, ch. 18, § 218e, 40 Stat. 1070 900
1919, Feb. 24, ch. 18, § 257, 40 Stat. 1086 455
1919, Feb. 24, ch. 18, §§ 300, 326, 40 Stat.
1088, 1092
54
1919, Feb. 24, ch. 18, § 402c, 40 Stat. 1097 483
1919, Feb. 24, ch. 18, § 402f, 40 Stat. 1097 146
1919, Feb. 24, ch. 18, §§ 405, 408, 40 Stat.
1099. 1100

478
1919, Feb. 24, ch. 18, § 1006, 40 Stat.
1130
.102, 257, 532, 808
1919, Feb. 24, ch. 18, § 1007, 40 Stat. 1132 532
1919, Feb. 24, ch. 18, § 1400, 40 Stat. 1149 478
1919, Feb. 26, ch. 48, 40 Stat. 1181..
21.

259, 357, 428
1919, July 11, ch. 6, § 1, 41 Stat. 35.. 293
1919, Oct. 28, ch. 85, 41 Stat. 305. 28, 59,
244, 309, 319, 324, 370, 397, 413, 467,
615, 760, 887

1919, Oct. 28, ch. 85, tit. 2, § 3, 41 Stat.
308

.65, 545

590

1910, June 25, ch. 412, § 8, 36 Stat. 840...
1911, March 3, ch. 231, 36 Stat. 1087. See
Judicial Code.

682

881
1919, Oct. 28, ch. 85, tit. 2, § 25, 41 Stat.
315
.760, 804, 861
1919, Oct. 28, ch. 85, tit. 2, § 26, 41 Stat.
315

..65, 189

1919, Oct. 28, ch. 85, tit. 2. § 28, 41 Stat.
316

189

1913, Jan. 23, ch. 9, 37 Stat. 650..

590

1913, Oct. 3, ch. 16, 38 Stat. 114.

1914, Jan. 20, ch. 11, 38 Stat. 278..

1919. Oct. 28, ch. 85, tit. 2, § 29, 41 Stat.
316
.244, 295
1919. Oct. 28, ch. 85, tit. 2, § 32, 41 Stat.

1914, Sept. 26, ch. 311, § 5, 38 Stat. 719...
1914, Oct. 15, ch. 323, 38 Stat. 730...
1914, Dec. 17, ch. 1, 38 Stat. 785..109, 259, 553
1914, Dec. 17, ch. 1, § 1, 38 Stat. 785.
Amended 1919, Feb. 24, ch. 18, § 1006,
40 Stat. 1130..
.102, 257, 532, 808
1914, Dec. 17, ch. 1, § 2, 38 Stat. 786..
1914, Dec. 17, ch. 1, § 6, 38 Stat. 789.
Amended 1919, Feb. 24, ch. 18, § 1007,
40 Stat. 1130

1919, Oct. 29, ch. 89, 41 Stat. 324.
1920, Feb. 25, ch. 85, § 34, 41 Stat. 450... 112
1920, Feb. 28, ch. 91, § 406, 41 Stat. 480.. 164
1920, March 9, ch. 95, 41 Stat. 525....501, 893
1920, March 9, ch. 95, § 5, 41 Stat. 526... 676
1920, March 9, ch. 95, § 6, 41 Stat. 527...501
1920, March 30, ch. 111, 41 Stat. 537.... 953
1920, June 5, ch. 241, 41 Stat. 977..
1920, June 5, ch. 250, 41 Stat. 1000..
1920, June 5, ch. 250, § 30C, 41 Stat. 1000 379
1920, June 5, ch. 250, § 30D, 41 Stat.
1000
....379, 505
1920, June 5, ch. 250, § 30M, 41 Stat. 1004 379
1920. June 5, ch. 250, § 30P-R, 41 Stat.
1005
505
1920, June 5, ch. 250, § 33, 41 Stat. 1007..1005
1921, Feb. 27, ch. 76, 41 Stat. 1147.
293

.1005

« Sebelumnya Lanjutkan »

Buku