CENT OF INCREASE, 1890-1900 AND 1900-1910, AND RANKING OF THE STATES IN 1910 AND 1900-Continued POPULATION OF THE UNITED STATES Population State Increase from 1900 to 1910 Increase from 1890 to 1900 Rank in Population Population 1 Per Sq. Mile 16.5 275,861 17.1 16 13.1 189,167 16.4 17.7 378,978 20.6 TABLE IV.-POPULATION OF CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES, BY STATES AND GEOGRAPHICAL DIVISIONS, 1890-1910, WITH NUMBER AND PER 1910 1900 1890 2 Number Per Cent Number Per Cent 1910 1900 1910 1900 East South Central Division 8,409,901 7,547,757 6,429,154 862,144 11.4 1,118,603 17.4 North Carolina 2,206,287 1,893,810 1,617,949 312,477 South Carolina 1,515,400 1,340,316 1,151,149 175,084 Georgia --- 2,609,121 2,216,331 1,837,353 392,790 Florida Kentucky 752,619 528,542 391,422 224,077 2,289,905 2,147,174 1,858,635 142,731 Tennessee 2,184,789 2,020,616 1,767,518 164,173 Alabama 2,138,093 1,828,697 1,513,401 309,396 Mississippi 1,797,114 1,551,270 1,289,600 245,844 West South Central Division 8,784,534 6,532,290 4,740,983 2,252,244 Arkansas 1,574,449 1,311,564 1,128,211 262,885 Louisiana 1,656.388 1,381,625 1,118,588 274,763 Oklahoma 1,657,155 * 790,391 4258,657 866,764 Texas 3,896,542 3,048,710 2,235,527 847,832 Mountain Division 2,633,517 1,674,657 1,213,935 958,860 Montana 376.053 243,329 142,924 132,724 Idaho 325,594 161,772 88,548 163,822 Wyoming 145.965 92,531 62,555 53.434 Colorado 799.024 539,700 413,249 259,324 New Mexico 327,301 195,310 160,282 131,991 Arizona 204,354 122.931 88.243 81,423 Utah 373,351 276,749 210,779 96,602 Nevada 81,875 42,335 47,355 39,540 Pacific Division 4,192,304 2,416,692 1,888,334 1,775,612 Washington 1,141,990 518.103 357,232 623.887 120.4 160.871 45.0 Oregon California 672,765 413,536 317,704 259,229 62.7 95,832 30.2 1,213,398 892,496 60.1 271,655 22.4 1 Hawaii and Alaska, which do not appear in this table, rank as 48 and 51, respectively, both in the ranking for 1910 and 1900. Total population, including population of Indian Territory and Indian reservations, which were specially enumerated in 1890. 3 Decrease. * Includes the population of Indian Territory, which was 392,060 in 1900 and 180,182 in 1890. The territory of Oklahoma in 1900 ranked 38 and Indian Territory 39. The ranking for 1900 includes the population of Indian Territory with that of Oklahoma. POPULATION OF THE UNITED STATES L.L. POATES ENGR'S CO., N. Y. 95° 90° Longitude 85° West from 80 Greenwich 75° DISTRIBUTION OF THE POPULATION IN 1790 The middle Atlantic division, in which are located New York and Pennsylvania, demonstrates the growth of the great manufacturing states in contrast with the comparatively stationary position of the agricultural states, with the exceptions above noted. Urban Growth.-This is the most significant development of the census of 1910-a development further marked by the fact that the population growth of these manufacturing states is almost wholly confined to the cities, the strictly rural districts of these states show DISTRIBUTION OF THE POPULATION EAST OF THE 100TH MERIDIAN IN 1810 ing in many instances an actual decline in population. In New York, where there was an increase of 25.4 per cent, twenty of the sixty-one counties have decreased in population since 1900. In that year one-half of all the counties in the United States, of which there are 2800, either decreased in population or showed an increase of less than 15 per cent. In the states of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri, Kentucky, and Tennessee, comprising the great northern middle section of the country, and DISTRIBUTION OF THE POPULATION EAST OF THE 100TH MERIDIAN IN 1830 formerly the heart of the agricultural district, | population increase has been accompanied by 440 out of 950 counties decreased from 1900 a great increase in farm values and the value to 1910. In other words, with the exceptions of farm products. noted, the population increase is almost wholly confined to municipalities, to increase in the urban population. Curiously enough, this This rapid encroachment of the urban upon the rural population is the most significant deduction to be drawn from our recent |