« SebelumnyaLanjutkan »
HUSBAND AND WIFE-Continued.
of note it was given to secure ; jurisdiction. Mers-
directly impeached. Barrows v. National Rubber
piano are household furniture, and exempt from.
oner under civil process; "offense,” what is, within
denranded. State of North Carolina v. Perry (D. C.
contract of purchase. Hinkley & E. Iron Co. v.
of mortgage to foreclose ; payınent of judgment by
Dougherty v. Remington Paper Co. (N. Y. App.)..... 273
to lay track through city ; right need not be exclu-
road. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. R. R. Co. v. Hamblin
expectation.' Nevill v. Snelling (Eng. Ch. D). 503
gaine liko laro, keno, etc. Nuckolls v. Comm. (Va.
acceptance; when not transferable. King v. Batter-
what does not constitute jurisdiction; infant sur-
Guardianship of Hubbard Infants (N. Y. App.) 315
ity in drawing juror does not vitiate acts of jury.
See Criminal Law,
tion to public. Talbott v. Richmond & D. R. R. Co.
ground; use of part of premises for business pur-
maintainable between. Hobbs v. Hobbs (Me. S. C.), 73
ity of husband. Biery v. Ziegler (Penn. S. C.). 398
separate estate. Pratt v. State (Ohio S. C.).... 144
necessaries; revocation of implied authority. Deben-
to pledge his credit for articles suitable to her
ICE. See Negligence.
Woman; Parent and Child ; Pleading.
to restrain another in same court. Mann v. Flower
prove actual damage in an action to restrain.
from running cars on rails made, without baving
one negligently causing fire; joinder of parties.
Swarthout v. Chicago & N. W. R. R. Co. (Wis. s. C.), 256
be cancelled and note surrendered by agreement of
parties. Acker, Rec'r, v. Hite (Penn. s. C.).... 357
waiver. Critchett v. American Ins. Co. (Iowa S. C.), 137
not concealed and actually destroyed, company
liable for Austrian case.
ance for another's benefit. Reitenbach v. Johnson
avoiding policy. Southern Mut. Ins. Co. v. Kloeber
ation of insured. Titus v. Glen's Falls Ins. Co. (N.Y.
dor and purchaser. Rayner v. Preston (Eng. Ch. D.) 339
equity may enforce payment; misrepresentation;
subsequent act. Black v. Nat'l lus Co. (L. Can).... 123
of loss, does not avoid policy. Dogge v. Northwest-
not. Stupetzki v. Transatlantic F. Ins. Co. (Mich.
compromise of loss; misrepresentations as to owner-
ship. Stache v. St. Paul F. & M. Ins. Co. (Wis. S. C.) 37
ing induced by epileptic fit. Winspear v. Accident
child ; stipulation in policy contravening charter of
complying with State laws as to business. Cowardin
habitual drunkard. Odd Fellows Mut. Life Ins. Co. v.
INTEREST. On mortgage after due not at contract
but at usual rate. Goodchap v. Roberts (Eng. App.). 218
See Conflict of Laus; Constitutional Law; Guard-
Practice ; Waiver.
See Criminal Law.
See Grand Jury.
See Religious Society.
2.- Bill of lading; for what goods owners of vessels re-
sponsible; authority of master; nature of instru-
(Me S. C.).......
9.-Jurisdiction of admiralty as to crew of foreign ves-
save property. Scaramanga v. Stamp (Eng. App.).. 359
12.-Sunday, seamen can be required to work on. Smith
See Jurisdiction, Sunday.
man, which she is not bound to pay, will prove a suff-
LARCENY. See Criminal Law.
what is an assessment. Budd v. Marshall (Eng.
2 --Covenant as to use of premises - waiver by accept-
ing rent. Griffin v. Tompkins (Eng. Q. B. D.)
LEGACY. See Will.
session when he feels insecure, not arbitrary. Roy
v. Goings (II. s. C.).
2.-Chattel; rights of joint mortgagees. Hanrahan v.
Roche (Buil. S. C.)...
3.-Challels, on merchandise with privilege to sell; deed
of trust. Scott v. Alfred (Tex. s. C.)..
4.-Chattel, of subsequently-acquired personal prop-
erty Lazarus v. Andrade (Eng. C. P. D.)
5. Of goods to be inanufactured when valid in equity.
First National Bank of Alexandria v. Turnbull (Va.
6. Of merchandise, when not fraudulent. Hastings v.
Parke (Buff. S. C.).
7.-Real estate; change of form of indebtedness does
Dot discharge. Heirly v. Mattison (Iowa S, C.)..... 397
NATIONAL BANKS. Construction of Federal
statute; State court has jurisdiction in action against
of bank. Robinson y National Bank (N. Y. App.), 15
13.-Engine on railway near highway making noise with-
out notice; question of fact. Hart v. Chicago, R. I.
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS-Cont'd. PAGE.
of law. Brooklyn C. & N. R. R. Co. v. Nat'l Bank (U.
identity of maker falsely represented by payee.
for cause; supervising engineer not answerable for
ple ex rel. Campbell v. Campbell (N. Y. App.)........ 354
notice to client; equitable interest. Cave v. Cave
Seo Statutory Construction.
OFFICE AND OFFICER. Eligibility; removal of
disabilities after election and before entering on du-
posed welfare of children, the parents being on an
wealth ex rel. Drummond v. Ashton (Phila. Qr.
and frivolous. Becker v. Weisner (Buff. S. C.)..... 156
brought, irrelevant, etc, Storck v. Buffalo German
evidence not objected to. Cutler v. Getz
tory construction ; certificate of probable cause.
Campbell v. James (U. S. C. C., N.'Y.)........ 263
charging arrest; opinion of court below cannot
control order. In re Nebenzahl (N. Y. App.) 114
error before exceptions signed no waiver; date of
term ; appeal. Phillips v. Ordway (U. S. S. C.)
not sufficient. Knapp, Rec., v. Roche (N. Y. App.). 454
be filed. Brooks v. Burlington & S. Ry. Co. (U.S.
sufficient to authorize. Belmont v. Coenen (N. Y.
be referred to for explanation ; discretion of court
der and libel.
pure!y Burd Orphan Asylum v. School Dist.
creditor to induce him to join in compromise, not
recoverable back. Solinger v Earle (N. Y. App.).... 474
misdemeanor; right to return of securities deposited.
law right to a copy or abstract of entire records in
PARTIES. To suit to determine validity of will, per.
song not in esse. McArthur v. Allen (U. S. C. C.,
third person; sub-partnership ; sub-partner not
liable as partner. Burnett v. Snyder (N. Y. App.)... 337
by agreement of dissolution; vesting one partner
firm in name of single meinber. Yorkshire Bkg. Co.
Act, 1851, 8 11; arbitration clause; order of reference.
creditor may eiect between firm and individual liabil-
creditor may hold both firm and individual partners;
debt out of, by payment. Goodwin v. Parton (Eng.
feit. White v. Lee (U S.C. C., Mass.)
tion liable for infringement. Munson v. Mayor
against purchasers from other manufacturers; when
RAILROADS. Action lies to compel construction
of farm crossing. Jones v. Seligman, Trustee (N. Y.
of leased road liable for cattle killed by failure to
fence Fontain v. Southern P. R. R. Co. (Cal. S. C.), 57
company not liable for injury to adjoining property.
nent Domain; Franchise; Injunction; Jurisdiction ;
Municipal Corporations; Negligence.
highway; right of way lot. Walton y. Wray (Iowa
v. Indianapolis & L. F. R. R. Co. (U. S. C. C., Ohio).. 216
enant of corporation to pay rent. People v. Nat'l
take possession upon default, receiver may be ap-
Co. v. Superior Court (Cal. S. C.)....
prejudice mortgagee. Sinclair V. Slawson (Mich.
unauthorized discharge by assignor after assign-
surety's land under mortgage sale. Hassey v. Wilke,
lie to compel restoration to membership. State ex
rel. Soares v. Hebrew Congregation (La. S. C.). 483
ing to, from State to Federal courts, does not pro-
hearing. Jifkins v. Sweetser (U.S. S. C.)... 516
citizenship of the parties cannot be controverted.
See Criminal Law; Jurisdiction.
party bringing about entitled to. Austrian case... 422
See Husband and Wife.
by land of grantor, when not allowable. Mayor v.
necessary age. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Sanderson
pensation for appropriation ; eminent domain. City
SEDUCTION. See Evidence.
also an editor of a newspaper, cannot be summarily
Steinman aad Hensel, attorneys (Penn. S. C.).. 311
charged ; evidence of repetition of words admissible
known to defendant not provable. Hatfield v.
public officer. Hamilton v. Eno (N. Y. App.).... 196
by naval officer on resignation of plaintiff. Maurice
ment to purchase subject to not agreement to
can only be avoided by parties to, marine insurance:
contract. Providence Christian Union v. Elliott (R.
notice of arbitration, when unnecessary. Morton v.
ment of debt to person other than creditor. Din-
Merchants' Nat. Bank of Baltimore y. First Nat.
has no funds with drawee. Brush v. Barrett (N. Y.
commencement of the action in which it is pleaded.
struction; old Code, 8 101; new Code, 88 381, 414; Laws
of interest not evidence of demand. Brown v.
controlling general - majority of official board act
ch. 741; 1851, ch. 479. Acker v. Acker (N. Y. App.).. 35
follow State courts as to State statutes Mohr v.
(Eng. Q. B. D.)....
tice ; Railroads.
debts between members. E.c parte Grant ; Re Plum-
by unreasonable and indirect route Davis y. Somer-
ing contract to sell real estate from vendee as secu-
rity ; Statute of Frauds. Roe v. Barker (N. Y. App.), 495
SABBATH BREAKING. See Criminal Law.
opening; intervention of third person. Bla urn
delivered; death of horse before sale became abso-
lute. Elphick v. Barnes (Eng. C. P. D.)....... 419
when part delivery gives right of action. Avery v.
fraudulent purchaser good delivery. Old Dominion
(Wis. S. C.).
from fraudulent purchaser good delivery. Old Do-
ute of Frauds.
solvency; special deposits. Stocton, Att’y-Gen.,