(271 F.) Page 14 810 Page 540 507 White v. Goodrich-Lenhart Mfg. Co. (D. C. Pa.). 336 Yates v. Smith (C. C. A. N. J.) 33 Yates v. Smith (D. C. N. J.) 27 Birmingham Trust & Savings Co. v. At- 743 658 271 671 289 385 80 89 FOURTH CIRCUIT. Baker v. Bryant Fertilizer Co. (C. C. A. S. C.)... Drummer v. St. Charles Land Co. (C. C. A. La.).. 258 473 Eddy v. St. Charles Land Co. (C. C. A. La.) 254 Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. Lambert Run Coal Co. (C. C. A. W. Va. .1020 Berkley, The (D. C. Va.). 35 Bryant v. Charles L. Stockhausen Co. (C. Escolar v. United States (C. C. A. La.)..1020 788 199 Č. A. Va.).. 921 General Securities Co. v. Driscoll (C. C. Brydon v. Big Vein Coal Co. of West Vir A. Fla.). 295 ginia (C. C. A. Md.). 949 Coalmont Moshannon Coal Co. v. Matthew Addy Steamship & Commerce Corpora Grey v. Nickey Bros. (C. C. A. La.) Higgins Oil & Fuel Co. v. Delaney (C. C. 249 tion (D. C. Va.). 114 A. La.).. 1021 Coca-Cola Co. v. Old Dominion Beverage Corporation (C. C. A. Va.).. Dingess v. Huntington Development & Gas Co. (C. C. A. W. Va.)..... 864 Miller v. C. C. Hartwell Co. (C. C. A. La.) 385 Newberry v. Central of Georgia R. Co. (D. C. Ala.). 117 General Shipbuilding Co., In re (C. C. A. Va.) 921 Robertson v. Ingram-Day Lumber Co. (C. C. A. Miss.) Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. New Orleans .1023 861 97 SIXTH CIRCUIT. 38 Norris v. No-Leak-O Piston Ring Co. (D. C. Md.).. 536 Beaver, Ex parte (D. C. Ohio) 493 Pehr Ugland, The (D. C. Va.). 340 304 Senick v. United States (C. C. A. Va.) 918 Belknap Hardware & Mfg. Co. v. Ohio River Contract Co. (C. C. A. Ky.) Benton Harbor-St. Joseph Gas & Fuel Co. v. Middle West Coal Co. (C. C. A. Mich.) 144 216 951 Turlington v. New York, P. & N. R. Co. (D. C. Va.). 35 FIFTH CIRCUIT. Dearborn Pub. Co. v. Fitzgerald (D. C. Ohio) 479 Ebersole v. McGrath (D. C. Ohio) Elliott v. United States (D. C. Ohio). Employers' Indemnity Corporation Grant (C. C. A. Mich.).. 995 ..1001 V. 136 A. Erie R. Co. v. Hodges, two cases (C. A. Ohio). Bash v. St. Charles Land Co. (C. C. A. District of Columbia v. Pearson (App. D. C.) 377 797 428 541 Timmons v. Morris (D. C. Wash.) Twin Falls Oakley Land & Water Co. v. Martens (C. C. A. Idaho).. United States v. Hallowell (D. C. Wash.) 795 United States v. Marquette (D. C. Cal.).. 120 United States v. People's Fuel & Feed Co. (D. C. Ariz.) 790 Wenatchee Produce Co. v. Great Northern R. Co. (D. C. Wash.). DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. 784 Browning v. Johnson (App. D. C.)......1017 Edwards v. Brownlow (App. D. C.).. Loftus v. District of Columbia (App. D. C.) 127 366 126 556 559 799 381 Crowley v. O'Neil (App. D. C.) 379 Diamond Coal & Coke Co. of Wyoming v. Payne (App. D. C.). Underwood v. Underwood (App. D. C.).. 553 370 362 District of Columbia v. Cranford Paving Co. (App. D. C.). District of Columbia v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland (App. D. C.). Zinkhan v. District of Columbia (App. D. 383 C.) 542 ... CASES ON REHEARING CASES IN THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURTS OF APPEALS IN WHICH REHEARINGS HAVE BEEN GRANTED OR DENIED EIGHTH CIRCUIT Hewey v. Cudahy Packing Co., 269 F. 21. Denied June 1, 1921. Hewey v. Jacob Dold Packing Co., 269 F. 24. Denied June 1, 1921. Ketchum v. U. S., 270 F. 416. Denied June 21, 1921. NINTH CIRCUIT Farley v. U. S., 269 F. 721. Granted May 16, 1921. CASES ARGUED AND DETERMINED · IN THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURTS OF APPEALS, THE DISTRICT COURTS, AND THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA In re AUTOMATIC TYPEWRITER & SERVICE CO. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. January 12, 1921.) No. 107. 1. Bankruptcy 76 (2)-Attaching creditor may join in petition without first releasing his attachment. That a creditor has in good faith attached his debtor's property within four months does not disqualify him from presenting or joining in a petition to have the debtor adjudicated a bankrupt, although the attachment has not been formally released, but the court may require the attachment lien to be vacated before an adjudication is entered. 2. Bankruptcy 65-Action by creditor not bar to involuntary proceedings. The pendency of an action by the petitioning creditor on his claim against the alleged bankrupt, in which a counterclaim has been interposed, is not a bar to involuntary proceedings. 3. Bankruptcy 65-Motive of creditor in filing petition immaterial. The motive of a creditor in filing a petition in involuntary bankruptcy against his debtor is immaterial. Petition to Revise Order of the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. In the matter of the Automatic Typewriter & Service Company, alleged bankrupt. On petition by alleged bankrupt to revise orders denying a motion to dismiss the petition and granting a motion to dismiss certain defenses pleaded. Affirmed. Petition to revise two orders made by the District Court for the Southern District of New York; the first denying a motion made by the alleged bankrupt to dismiss the involuntary petition in bankruptcy filed by the Hooven Automatic Typewriter Corporation, a creditor, and the second granting a motion to dismiss seven defenses set up in the answer filed by the alleged bankrupt as insufficient in law. The alleged bankrupt appeals. Patterson, Eagle, Greenough & Day, of New York City (Carroll G. Walter, of New York City, of counsel), for petitioner. David W. Kahn, of New York City, for respondent. For other cases see same topic & KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests & Indexes 271 F.-1 |