Cases Disposed of Without Consideration by the Court. 215 U.S.

No. 76. J. A. HUGHES, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. THE COLLIN COUNTY NATIONAL BANK. In error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado. January 7, 1910. Dismissed with costs, pursuant to the tenth rule. Mr. Clayton C. Dorsey and Mr. William D. Hodges for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendant in error.

No. 175. CUDAHY PACKING COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota. January 18, 1910. Dismissed, per stipulation. Mr. Moritz Heim for plaintiff in error. Mr. E. T. Young, Mr. George W. Peterson and Mr. Al J. Smith for defendant in error.

No. 507. WOODWARD CARRIAGE COMPANY ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. PITTS LIVERY COMPANY ET AL. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Texas. January 19, 1910. Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for appellants. Mr. T. D. Cobbs for appellants. No appearance for appellees.

No. 338. THE UNITED STATES, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. CHARLES S. SARGENT. In error to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. January 24, 1910. Dismissed on motion of Mr. Solicitor General Bowers for plaintiff in error. The Attorney General and The Solicitor General for plaintiff in error. Mr. Luther C. Harris for defendant in

error.

No. 750. FRED ANDERSON, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. THE

215 U.S.

Case Disposed of in Vacation.

UNITED STATES. In error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota. January 24, 1910. Docketed and dismissed on motion of Mr. Solicitor General Bowers for defendant in error. The Attorney General and The Solicitor General for defendant in error. No appearance for plaintiff in erro".

No. 109. T. M. STANCLIFT ET AL., ETC., APPELLANTS, v. CHARLIE FOX ET AL. Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. January 24, 1910. Dismissed with costs pursuant to the tenth rule. Mr. William T. Hutchings for appellant. Mr. Preston C. West for appellees.

No. 695. RACHEL A. RICHARDSON, CLAIMING TO BE RACHEL A. BROWN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. MARY S. REEVES ET AL. In error to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. January 26, 1910. Dismissed with costs, on motion of counsel for plaintiff in error. Mr. Tracy L. Jeffords for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Benjamin H. Schwartz and Mr. Milton Strasburger for defendants in error.

CASE DISPOSED OF IN VACATION.

No. 65. PATRICK COX, APPELLANT, v. LUMAN T. HOY, UNITED STATES MARSHAL FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois. July 7, 1909. Dismissed pursuant to the 28th rule. Mr. William Dillon for appellant. Mr. William G. Johnson and The Attorney General for appellee.

INDEX.

ACTIONS.

See CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 3;

EQUITY, 2, 3, 4, 7;

PARTIES.

ACTS OF CONGRESS.

COMMERCE, Act of February 4, 1887, § 15, as amended in 1906 (see
Courts, 15): Balto. & Ohio R. R. Co. v. Pitcairn Coal Co., 481
(see Interstate Commerce Commission, 6): Interstate Commerce
Commission v. Illinois Central R. R. Co., 452. Section 23 added
in 1889 and § 15 as amended in 1906 (see Mandamus, 6): Balto. &
Ohio R. R. Co. v. Pitcairn Coal Co., 481. Hepburn Act of June 29,
1906, § 15 (see Commerce, 4): Interstate Commerce Commission v.
Stickney, 98.

CONSPIRACY, Rev. Stat., § 5440 (see Criminal Law, 2): United States v.
Stevenson (No. 2), 200.

COPYRIGHTS, Act of July 8, 1870, 16 Stat. 212 (see Copyrights, 2):
Caliga v. Inter Ocean Newspaper Co., 182.

CUSTOMS, Customs Administrative Act of June 10, 1890, § 9, 26 Stat.

131 (see Customs Law, 1): United States v. Mescall, 26. Tariff
act of July 24, 1897, § 297, 30 Stat. 151 (see Customs Law, 2):
Komada v. United States, 392.

EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ACT of June 11, 1906, 34 Stat. 232 (see Em-
ployers' Liability Act): El Paso & Northeastern Ry. Co. v. Gu-
tierrez, 87.

IMMIGRATION, Act of February 20, 1907, 34 Stat. 898 (see Statutes
A 4): United States v. Stevenson, 190. Section 4 (see Criminal
Law, 2): Ib.

INDIANS, Act of February 8, 1887, 24 Stat. 388 (see Indians, 2, 4):
United States v. Celestine, 278. Act of May 8, 1906, 34 Stat. 182
(see Indians, 4): Ib.

JUDICIARY, Act of 1789 (see Courts, 1): Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana
Bank Co., 33.. Act of March 3, 1875, 18 Stat. 47, as amended by
act of March 3, 1887, 24 Stat. 552, corrected by act of August 13,
1888, 25 Stat. 433 (see Jurisdiction, C 2): Macon Grocery Co. v.

621

Atlantic Coast Line R. R. Co., 501. Act of March 3, 1891, § 5,
26 Stat. 826, as amended January 20, 1897, 29 Stat. 492 (see
Jurisdiction, A 4, 5, 6): Mechanical Appliance Co. v. Castleman,
437; The Steamship Jefferson, 130. Act of February 11, 1903,
§ 1, 32 Stat. 823 (see Jurisdiction, A 3): Baltimore & Ohio R. R.
Co. v. Interstate Com. Com., 216; Southern Pacific Co. v. Interstate
Com. Com., 226. Criminal Appeals Act of March 2, 1907, 34 Stat.
1246 (see Jurisdiction, A 1, 2): United States v. Corbett, 233.
Rev. Stat., § 709 (see Jurisdiction, A 7, 8, 9, 11, 13): El Paso &
Northeastern Ry. Co. v. Gutierrez, 87; Sylvester v. Washington, 80;
First National Bank v. Estherville, 341; Scully v. Squier, 144;
Kansas City Star Co. v. Julian, 589. Rev. Stat., § 914 (see Courts,
12): Mechanical Appliance Co. v. Castleman, 437 (see Practice
and Procedure, 5): Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. Kirven, 252.
NATIONAL BANKS, Rev. Stat., § 5209 (see Criminal Law, 4, Jurisdic-

tion, A 2, Statutes, A 2): United States v. Corbett, 233. Rev. Stat.,
§ 5311 (see Statutes, A 2): Ib.

OLEOMARGARINE, Act of May 9, 1902, § 6, 32 Stat. 193 (see Statutes,
A 7): United States v. Union Supply Co., 50.

PHILIPPINE ORGANIC ACT of July 1, 1902, 32 Stat. 691 (see Jurisdic-

tion, A 10): Reavis v. Fianza, 16. Section 22 (see Philippine
Islands, 1): Ib. Sections 28 and 45 (see Philippine Islands, 2, 3):
Ib.

PUBLIC LANDS, Act of July 1, 1862, 12 Stat. 489 (see Public Lands, 4):
Union Pacific R. R. Co. v. Harris, 386. Oregon Donation Act of
September 27, 1850, 9 Stat. 496, as amended July 17, 1854, § 2,
10 Stat. 305 (see Public Lands, 6): Sylvester v. Washington, 80.
Rev. Stat., § 2387 (see Jurisdiction, A 11; Public Lands, 5):
Scully v. Squier, 144.

PUBLIC WORKS, Labor and Material Law of February 24, 1905, 33 Stat.
811, amending act of August 13, 1894, 28 Stat. 278 (see Public
Works, 1, 3): Mankin v. Ludowici-Celadon Co., 533.

ADMIRALTY.

1. Jurisdiction of case involving salvage service to vessel in dry dock.
Salvage service, over which a court of admiralty has jurisdiction, may

arise from all perils which may encompass a vessel when on
waters within the admiralty jurisdiction of the United States,
and this includes services rendered to a vessel undergoing repairs
in dry dock and in danger of being destroyed by fire which origi-
nated on land. The Steamship Jefferson, 130.

2. Jurisdiction over vessel in dry dock.

A vessel used for navigation and commerce does not cease to be a