Gambar halaman
PDF
ePub
[blocks in formation]

Mr. James D. Dewell, Jr., and Mr. Avery Fayette Cushman for appellant.

Mr. Charles N. Snyder for appellee.

Per Curiam. Decree affirmed with costs.

KENYON v. FOWLER, RECEIVER OF AMERICAN EXCHANGE NATIONAL BANK OF SYRACUSE.

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.

No. 87. Argued January 18, 1910.-Decided January 24, 1910.

Judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals affirming a judgment of the District Court for an assessment of stock of an insolvent national bank made by the Comptroller, affirmed without opinion.

155 Fed. Rep. 107, affirmed.

Mr. Dorr Raymond Cobb for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Leonard C. Crouch for defendant in error.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with costs, and cause remanded to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York. Keyser v. Hitz, 133 U. S. 138; Finn v. Brown, 142 U. S. 56; Richmond v. Irons, 121 U. S. 27; Matteson v. Dent, 176 U. S. 521. Opinion below, 155 Fed. Rep. 107; S. C., 83 C. C. A. 567.

VOL. CCXV-38

Syllabus.

215 U. S.

DYER v. CITY OF MELROSE.

ERROR TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF

MASSACHUSETTS.

No. 93. Argued January 20, 1910.-Decided January 24, 1910.

A judgment of the state court sustaining a tax on property of an officer of the United States Navy affirmed on the authority of previous cases.1

197 Massachusetts, 99, affirmed.

Mr. Chester M. Pratt for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Claude L. Allen for defendant in error.

[ocr errors]

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with costs.

Hibernia

Savings Society v. San Francisco, 200 U. S. 310; McIntosh v. Aubrey, 185 U. S. 122; Railroad Co. v. Peniston, 18 Wall. 5; case below, Dyer v. Melrose, 197 Massachusetts, 99.

BERGER v. TRACY.

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IOWA.

No. 97. Submitted January 21, 1910.-Decided January 24, 1910.

A writ of error to review judgment of the highest court of a State dismissed for want of jurisdiction, on authority of Castillo v. Mc

1 As stated in the brief of defendant in error:

"This case presents the single question whether money which the plaintiff in error has received as salary or emoluments from the Federal Government, after being so received and deposited in national banks, subject to check, is exempt from taxation by local authorities in Massachusetts, on the principle that a State cannot lay a tax upon an office under the Government of the United States, nor upon any means or instruments used solely for the maintenance of the Federal Government or the performance of any of its functions."

[blocks in formation]

Connico, 168 U. S. 674; no Federal question was suggested prior to petition for writ of error.

Writ of error to review 135 Iowa, 597, dismissed.

Mr. Chester C. Cole for plaintiff in error.

No appearance for defendant in error.

Per Curiam. Writ of error dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Castillo v. McConnico, 168 U. S. 674. No Federal question suggested prior to petition for writ of error. Case below, 135 Iowa, 597.

UNITED STATES v. TERMINAL RAILROAD ASSOCIATION OF ST. LOUIS.

CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI.

No. 597. Motion to dismiss submitted January 31, 1910. Decided January 31, 1910.

A certificate in which there was no opinion, judgment or order of the court below dismissed on authority of Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission, ante, p. 216.

The Attorney General and The Solicitor General for the United States.

No appearance for The Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis et al.

Per Curiam. Certificate dismissed on authority of Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 215 U. S. 216.

Decisions on Petitions for Writs of Certiorari. 215 U.S.

Decisions on Petitions for Writs of Certiorari from October 11, 1909, to February 20, 1910.

No. 457. AMERICAN WOOD WORKING MACHINERY COMPANY ET AL., PETITIONERS, v. THE UNION TRUST COMPANY ET AL. October 18, 1909. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied. Mr. Charles A. Douglas for petitioners. No appearance for respondents.

No. 458. WILLIAM F. GOESSLING, PETITIONER, v. THOMAS B. COLLIER. October 18, 1909. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied. Mr. Edward S. McCalmont and Mr. L. P. Loving for petitioner. No appearance for respondent.

No. 464. NOVELTY INCANDESCENT LAMP COMPANY, PETITIONER, V. THE EDISON ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY. October 18, 1909. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied. Mr. A. Parker Smith for petitioner. Mr. Richard N. Dyer and Mr. John Robert Taylor for respondent.

No. 471. THE HENRY DUBOIS SONS COMPANY, CLAIMANT, ETC., PETITIONER, v. THE STEAM TUG EUGENE F. MORAN, MICHAEL MORAN, CLAIMANT, ET AL.; and No. 472. THE HENRY DUBOIS SONS COMPANY, CLAIMANT, ETC., PETITIONER, V. THE NEW YORK CENTRAL & HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL. October 18, 1909. Petition for

215 U.S.

Decisions on Petitions for Writs of Certiorari.

writs of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. Mr. James Emerson Carpenter and Mr. Samuel Park for petitioner. Mr. William S. Montgomery, Mr. Archibald G. Thacher and Mr. Charles C. Burlingham for respondents.

No. 475. PYMAN STEAMSHIP COMPANY, LIMITED, PETITIONER, v. MEXICAN CENTRAL RAILWAY COMPANY, LIMITED. October 18, 1909. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. Mr. J. Parker Kirlin for petitioner. Mr. Joseph H. Choate, Jr., for respondent.

No. 476. AMERICAN MANUFACTURING COMPANY, PETITIONER, V. THE STEAMSHIP WILDENFELS, ETC., ET AL. October 18, 1909. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. Mr. Frederick M. Brown for petitioner. Mr. James J. Macklin and Mr. de Lagnel Berier for respondents.

No. 477. CHARLES F. HARRIS, LATE OWNER OF THE STEAM TUG DE VEAUX POWEL, PETITIONER, V. THE FERRYBOAT LACKAWANNA, ETC., THE HOBOKEN FERRY COMPANY, CLAIMANT. October 18, 1909. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. Mr. Frederick M. Brown for petitioner. Mr. James J. Macklin and Mr. de Lagnel Berier for respondent.

No. 479. BETTIS MAJORS AND A. T. BALL, TRUSTEE,

« SebelumnyaLanjutkan »