The Federal ReporterWest Publishing Company, 1953 |
Dari dalam buku
Hasil 1-3 dari 86
Halaman 84
... allowed it for the year 1942 . This circumstance , of course , arises from the fact that the 1941 state tax was ac- crued and allowed as a deduction for 1941 , deduction for 1941. Petitioner's answer , in effect , is that in 1921 when ...
... allowed it for the year 1942 . This circumstance , of course , arises from the fact that the 1941 state tax was ac- crued and allowed as a deduction for 1941 , deduction for 1941. Petitioner's answer , in effect , is that in 1921 when ...
Halaman 185
... allowed in Patent Office , since an appealed claim must be patentable in its own right in opin- ion of the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals , but similar claims allowed by Patent Office tribunals furnish evidence of what features ...
... allowed in Patent Office , since an appealed claim must be patentable in its own right in opin- ion of the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals , but similar claims allowed by Patent Office tribunals furnish evidence of what features ...
Halaman 191
... allowed claims in order to fully de- termine the views of the board and the examiner . In re Bisley , 197 F.2d 355 , 39 C.C.P.A. , Patents , 982 and cases cited there- in . We think the examiner's allowance of the specific compound of ...
... allowed claims in order to fully de- termine the views of the board and the examiner . In re Bisley , 197 F.2d 355 , 39 C.C.P.A. , Patents , 982 and cases cited there- in . We think the examiner's allowance of the specific compound of ...
Isi
Judges VII | 19 |
Court of Claims Rules XLVII | 22 |
Text of Opinions 1 | 178 |
Hak Cipta | |
1 bagian lainnya tidak diperlihatkan
Edisi yang lain - Lihat semua
Istilah dan frasa umum
action affirmed agree agreement alleged allowed amended amount appellant's appellee application Atty authority Board cause charge Chief Judge Circuit Judge Cite as 205 City claim Company considered constituted contention contract corporation counsel Court of Appeals damages decision defendant denied determination directed District Court duty effect employees entered entitled evidence fact Federal filed finding further granted ground held holding income injuries Internal Revenue involved issue judgment June jury L.Ed Labor lights limited matter means ment motion negligence Office operation opinion paid parties patent payment period person petition petitioner plaintiff present prior proceedings production question reason received record reference Relations respect respondent result rule S.Ct statement statute sufficient taxpayer testimony tion trial union United United States Court verdict Washington witness York