Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Judicature of the State of Indiana, Volume 15
Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, John Worth Kern, Augustus Newton Martin, John Lewis Griffiths, Francis Marion Dice, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy
Bobbs-Merrill Company, 1861
"With tables of the cases and principal matters" (varies).
Apa yang dikatakan orang - Tulis resensi
Kami tak menemukan resensi di tempat biasanya.
Edisi yang lain - Lihat semua
action administrator affirmed agreed agreement alleged amount answer appellant appellee apply assigned authorized averred bank bill bond cause cent Circuit Court claim collected Common Pleas complaint consideration Constitution contract costs Curiam.—The judgment damages debt December defendant delivered demand demurrer effect entitled error et al evidence excepted execution facts filed finding further given granted ground hands Held indorsement interest issue judge judgment jury justice land matter ment mortgage motion objection opinion overruled paid paragraph party payable payment person plaintiff pleaded present proceedings proper purchase question railroad reason received record recover reference refused rendered reply reversed road rule says sold statute subscription sued sufficient suit surety sustained taken Term thereof tion trial verdict witness
Halaman 133 - ... that a court of equity substitutes him in the place of the creditor, as a matter of course, without any agreement to that effect.
Halaman 34 - That the nature and extent of the liabilities of the drawer or indorser are to be determined according to the law of the place where the bill is drawn or indorsement made, has been adjudged both here and in England.
Halaman 167 - Assigns, for the which payment well and truly to be made and done, we bind ourselves, our Heirs, Executors and Administrators jointly and severally, firmly by these presents, sealed with our seals, and dated this 23d day of May AD l8l2.
Halaman 122 - ... payment from the surplus of the joint fund after satisfaction of the joint debts. The equity of the rule, on the other hand, equally requires that the joint creditors should only look to the surplus of the separate estates of the partners after payment of the separate debts. It was a principle of the Roman law, and it has been acknowledged in the equity jurisprudence of Spain, England, and the United States, that partnership debts must be paid out of the partnership estate, and private and separate...
Halaman 416 - The right of the board to act in an execution of the authority is placed upon the fact that a majority of the votes had been cast in favor of the subscription; and to have acted without first ascertaining it, would have been a clear violation of duty; and the ascertainment of the fact wag necessarily left to the inquiry and judgment of the board itself, as no other tribunal was provided for the purpose.
Halaman 201 - Judgment may be given for or against one or more of several plaintiffs, and for or against one or more of several defendants; and it may, when the justice of the case requires it, determine the ultimate rights of the parties on each side, as between themselves.
Halaman 336 - In the case of an assignment of a thing in action, the action by the assignee shall be without prejudice to any setoff or other defense, existing at the time of, or before notice of the assignment; but this Section shall not apply to a negotiable promissory note or bill of exchange, transferred in good faith, and upon good consideration, before due.
Halaman 335 - St. 1881, it is provided that '' notes payable to order or bearer, in a bank in this state, shall be negotiable as inland bills of exchange, and the payees and endorsees thereof may recover as in case of such bills.
Halaman 416 - ... that full power is conferred upon the board to subscribe for the stock and issue the bonds, when a majority of the voters of the county have determined in favor of the subscription, after due notice of the time and place of the election. The case assumes that the requisite notices were not given of the election, and hence that the vote has not been in conformity with the law.