Reports of Cases Argued and Decided in the Supreme Court of Georgia at the ..., Volume 95Jas. P. Harrison & Company, printers, 1895 |
Dari dalam buku
Hasil 1-5 dari 73
Halaman 1
... error in striking this plea is pre- sented for adjudication . 4. Although the plea alleged that the defendants ... plaintiff ac- quired the note in due course of trade , before its maturity , and this plea , properly construed , not alleging ...
... error in striking this plea is pre- sented for adjudication . 4. Although the plea alleged that the defendants ... plaintiff ac- quired the note in due course of trade , before its maturity , and this plea , properly construed , not alleging ...
Halaman 5
... error in allowing the amend- ment praying for a recovery of attorney's fees , over an objection that such an amendment set up a new and dis- tinct cause of action . The promise to pay these fees was part of the plaintiff's cause of ...
... error in allowing the amend- ment praying for a recovery of attorney's fees , over an objection that such an amendment set up a new and dis- tinct cause of action . The promise to pay these fees was part of the plaintiff's cause of ...
Halaman 7
... plaintiff was put on notice that the defendants , Win- gate & Mell , were ... plaintiff had full knowledge of these facts , we are at a loss to see how such ... error in rendering a judgment accordingly . Judgment affirmed . 95 8 111 749 ...
... plaintiff was put on notice that the defendants , Win- gate & Mell , were ... plaintiff had full knowledge of these facts , we are at a loss to see how such ... error in rendering a judgment accordingly . Judgment affirmed . 95 8 111 749 ...
Halaman 17
... plaintiff in error . HALL & HAMMOND , contra . SIMMONS , Chief Justice . This was an action in the city court of Atlanta , for a libel alleged to have been published Sept. 21st and Sept. 29th , 1891. The action was filed May 26th , 1893 ...
... plaintiff in error . HALL & HAMMOND , contra . SIMMONS , Chief Justice . This was an action in the city court of Atlanta , for a libel alleged to have been published Sept. 21st and Sept. 29th , 1891. The action was filed May 26th , 1893 ...
Halaman 32
... plaintiffs in error . COURTLAND S. WINN , by brief , contra . ATKINSON , Justice . The specific ground upon which the petition for cer- tiorari was dismissed in the court below was , that the plaintiff in error had not given notice of ...
... plaintiffs in error . COURTLAND S. WINN , by brief , contra . ATKINSON , Justice . The specific ground upon which the petition for cer- tiorari was dismissed in the court below was , that the plaintiff in error had not given notice of ...
Edisi yang lain - Lihat semua
Istilah dan frasa umum
accused affidavit alleged amendment amount appears ATKINSON Atlanta authorities bank Bibb county bill brought Carhart cause of action certiorari charged the jury City court claim contra contract conveyed corporation counsel creditors damages debt deceased declaration deed defendant defendant's demurrer dismissed duty employee entitled Equitable petition execution executor exercise fact favor February 27 fendant filed fraud Fulton county grant ground heirs indictment injury interest issue Judgment affirmed Judgment reversed Justice land levy liable LUMPKIN Macon March term matter ment mortgage motion negligence nonsuit November 12 ordinary overruled paid parties payment Pease person plaintiff in error plea possession premises promissory note purchase question railroad company reason record recover recovery refusing rendered rule Savannah SIMMONS sold solicitor-general statute sued suit superior court testator testified testimony therein tiff tion Tom Watts trustee verdict witness
Bagian yang populer
Halaman 79 - By reason of any defect in the condition of the ways, works, machinery, or plant connected with or used in the business of the employer...
Halaman 106 - No person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property, except by due process of law.
Halaman 739 - The presumption of negligence cast upon railroads by our statute in personal injury cases ceases when the railroad company has made it appear by a preponderance of the evidence that its agents have exercised all ordinary and reasonable care and diligence.
Halaman 479 - All exceptions which go merely to the form of an indictment, shall be made before trial, and no motion in arrest of judgment, or writ of error, shall be sustained, for any matter not affecting the real merits of the offense charged in the indictment.
Halaman 198 - ... to make out a prima facie case of negligence on the part of the company occurring within the borders of the State.
Halaman 68 - The jury are instructed, that the preponderance of evidence in a case is not alone determined by the number of witnesses testifying to a particular fact, or state of facts.
Halaman 227 - One of the principal weaknesses of the jury system is the rule which requires the jury to be satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt of the guilt of the accused before returning a verdict of conviction. As if this were not enough, we not infrequently find the courts delivering instructions to juries to give the "most charitable and merciful construction
Halaman 199 - If the error or mistake is attributable to atmospheric causes or disturbances, or to any cause for which the company is not at fault, it is entirely within its power to show it. To require the sender of the message to establish the particular act of negligence, or ferret out the particular locality where the negligent act occurred, after showing the mistake itself, would be to require in many cases an impossibility, not infrequently resulting in enabling the company to evade a just liability.
Halaman 277 - State from a drawee residing there, is liable for neglect of duty occurring in its collection, whether arising from the default of its own officers or from that of its correspondent in the other State, or an agent employed by such correspondent, in the absence of any express or implied contract varying such liability, is established by decisions in New York, Allen v. Merchants
Halaman 192 - The verdict of the jury is in accord with the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial. Judgment affirmed.