Reports of Cases Argued and Decided in the Supreme Court of Georgia at the ..., Volume 95Jas. P. Harrison & Company, printers, 1895 |
Dari dalam buku
Hasil 1-5 dari 79
Halaman 3
... debt at the time . The facts above alleged put plaintiff on notice that it was an accommo- dation paper . Further , said agreement was entered into by J. L. Mell of the firm sued , without the knowledge and consent of J. H. Wingate his ...
... debt at the time . The facts above alleged put plaintiff on notice that it was an accommo- dation paper . Further , said agreement was entered into by J. L. Mell of the firm sued , without the knowledge and consent of J. H. Wingate his ...
Halaman 8
... debt , and the mortgagor having paid the bal- ance due thereon , the grantee became liable to her in an action for the amount of such balance . November 12 , 1894. By two Justices . Complaint . Before Judge VAN EPPS . City court of ...
... debt , and the mortgagor having paid the bal- ance due thereon , the grantee became liable to her in an action for the amount of such balance . November 12 , 1894. By two Justices . Complaint . Before Judge VAN EPPS . City court of ...
Halaman 9
... debt to secure which it was given was not paid at maturity , the mortgagee had the power , after complying with certain conditions as to advertising , etc. , to sell the property described and ap- ply the proceeds to the payment of the debt ...
... debt to secure which it was given was not paid at maturity , the mortgagee had the power , after complying with certain conditions as to advertising , etc. , to sell the property described and ap- ply the proceeds to the payment of the debt ...
Halaman 10
... debt ( 1 Jones , Mortg . ( 4 ed . ) , §§749 , 752 ; 2 Warvelle , Vendors , p . 658 ) ; and if he fails to pay it when due , and the mortgagor himself pays the same , the amount so paid may be recovered by the mort- gagor in an action at ...
... debt ( 1 Jones , Mortg . ( 4 ed . ) , §§749 , 752 ; 2 Warvelle , Vendors , p . 658 ) ; and if he fails to pay it when due , and the mortgagor himself pays the same , the amount so paid may be recovered by the mort- gagor in an action at ...
Halaman 11
... debt , and for that purpose to sell the mortgaged property ; or that the mortgagor was not liable for the deficiency in the proceeds of the sale to the extent of the sum paid by her to the mortgagee and sued for in this action . It was ...
... debt , and for that purpose to sell the mortgaged property ; or that the mortgagor was not liable for the deficiency in the proceeds of the sale to the extent of the sum paid by her to the mortgagee and sued for in this action . It was ...
Edisi yang lain - Lihat semua
Istilah dan frasa umum
accused affidavit alleged amendment amount appears ATKINSON Atlanta authorities bank Bibb county bill brought Carhart cause of action certiorari charged the jury City court claim contra contract conveyed corporation counsel creditors damages debt deceased declaration deed defendant defendant's demurrer dismissed duty employee entitled Equitable petition execution executor exercise fact favor February 27 fendant filed fraud Fulton county grant ground heirs indictment injury interest issue Judgment affirmed Judgment reversed Justice land levy liable LUMPKIN Macon March term matter ment mortgage motion negligence nonsuit November 12 ordinary overruled paid parties payment Pease person plaintiff in error plea possession premises promissory note purchase question railroad company reason record recover recovery refusing rendered rule Savannah SIMMONS sold solicitor-general statute sued suit superior court testator testified testimony therein tiff tion Tom Watts trustee verdict witness
Bagian yang populer
Halaman 79 - By reason of any defect in the condition of the ways, works, machinery, or plant connected with or used in the business of the employer...
Halaman 106 - No person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property, except by due process of law.
Halaman 739 - The presumption of negligence cast upon railroads by our statute in personal injury cases ceases when the railroad company has made it appear by a preponderance of the evidence that its agents have exercised all ordinary and reasonable care and diligence.
Halaman 479 - All exceptions which go merely to the form of an indictment, shall be made before trial, and no motion in arrest of judgment, or writ of error, shall be sustained, for any matter not affecting the real merits of the offense charged in the indictment.
Halaman 198 - ... to make out a prima facie case of negligence on the part of the company occurring within the borders of the State.
Halaman 68 - The jury are instructed, that the preponderance of evidence in a case is not alone determined by the number of witnesses testifying to a particular fact, or state of facts.
Halaman 227 - One of the principal weaknesses of the jury system is the rule which requires the jury to be satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt of the guilt of the accused before returning a verdict of conviction. As if this were not enough, we not infrequently find the courts delivering instructions to juries to give the "most charitable and merciful construction
Halaman 199 - If the error or mistake is attributable to atmospheric causes or disturbances, or to any cause for which the company is not at fault, it is entirely within its power to show it. To require the sender of the message to establish the particular act of negligence, or ferret out the particular locality where the negligent act occurred, after showing the mistake itself, would be to require in many cases an impossibility, not infrequently resulting in enabling the company to evade a just liability.
Halaman 277 - State from a drawee residing there, is liable for neglect of duty occurring in its collection, whether arising from the default of its own officers or from that of its correspondent in the other State, or an agent employed by such correspondent, in the absence of any express or implied contract varying such liability, is established by decisions in New York, Allen v. Merchants
Halaman 192 - The verdict of the jury is in accord with the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial. Judgment affirmed.