Gambar halaman
[ocr errors][merged small]

which are awaiting a sufficient growth in population to ask for admission as States, and some of whom will receive it soon.

In giving to Congress this power of admitting new States, precautions were adopted to prevent injury to States already in the Union; no new State can be formed within an old State, as by the junction of two or more States, or parts of States, without the consent of the legislature of the States concerned, as well as of Congress.

It must be remembered that by this formation of new States the balance of power between the States may be much affected, by reason of the construction of the Senate. Thus Texas was admitted as a State in 1845. But in the act admitting that State (which covers a vast extent of country), it was provided that four new States might be formed from that single State. If that provision were carried into effect, what is now Texas would have five times the strength in the Senate which it now has.



The constitution provides that the United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a republican form of government.

The true construction of this clause is, not that the United States shall guarantee to each State that it shall have a republican government, but that the United States shall guarantee to every State that every other State shall have a republican form of government. For, let it be supposed that a State desired admission under a government which was not republican in form. Thus we may suppose by way of illustration, what is hardly possible, that one of the proyinces of the Dominion of Canada desired to enter into the Union, but that it retained so much fondness for monarchical government that it wished to have a permanent executive, with an hereditary body invested with hereditary rule or power. If the word "guarantee” is to be construed technically, it is only a promise to a party to make good to that party some benefit or advantage which that party requires or desires. Therefore, that party may waive the guaranty, and may say it was intended only to secure to us that we should have a republican form of government if we chose, and we do not choose it. Surely the answer would be, All the other States are interested in this question. All would be injured if there were one among them which was not republican, and the constitutior promises all that all should be republican.

The importance of this question springs from the possibility that some one or more of the States might desire changes in her form of government not compatible with republicanism. For example, it might disfranchise certain classes, giving the elective franchise only where a large pecuniary qualification existed, or making eligible to office only the members of a narrow class, always retaining the name of a republic. It is plain that every State might complain of this, and say to Congress, The constitution gives this guarantee of republicanism not to that State only, which may waive it if it will, but to all of us, and to every one of us; and we do not waive it.

If there is ever an attempted violation of the rule implied under this guaranty, it will undoubtedly be concealed and disguised by false pretences. That is to say, the State will claim still to be a republic, as Holland did when it became virtually a monarchy; and as Venice did, when its government became a close and despotic oligarchy. The difficulty will be in the exact definition of a republic. If the time ever comes when this difficulty shall present itself, well may we or our children or our children's children remember that Lincoln has left for us, under circumstances which made it immortal, the definition we have already spoken of. A government of the people, by the people, and for the people, is a republic, and cannot fail to be a republic. And a government which does not come within this definition, whatever it may call itself, is not a republic.



Some persons in our own country, and many more in the old countries of Europe, have regarded the respect which the people of this country pay to their constitution as excessive. They represent the constitution as a fetter upon us; as more than a fetter, — as an iron framework with which we have chosen to invest ourselves, and which, however we outgrow it, we cannot improve. This reproof would be just; were it not that the constitution provides for its own growth, development, and improvement.

It is the supreme law of the land, and expresses the will of the people. But every law is made by the servants of the people, and expresses their will. Why should not the constitution be as easily changed and made to conform as promptly to any change in the will of the people as the law itself? Look, however, at the law, and see how that can be changed, and, on the other hand, how it cannot be changed. A mass meeting of the citizens of Ohio, for example, even were that physically possible, could not change the law. And why? Because the people have seen fit to guard themselves against hasty and unwise legislation, by surrounding it with a certain measure of difficulty and delay. First, the servants of the people must be formally chosen by the people, to do for them this very work of legislation. Then they assemble in two bodies, each of which is a check upon the other, and the executive is entrusted with a limited veto upon the two Houses. Then every bill proposed, before it can become a law, must in each House pass through several appointed steps, at any one of which it may be arrested, and all of which taken together tend to secure to every proposed measure a sufficient consideration.

The question may now be repeated, Why are not these checks sufficient in the case of the constitution? The answer is easy. The constitution contains what the people believe to be essential and fundamental principles of all law, together with a machinery of government carefully devised to secure wise legislation and faithful execution of the laws; and to this machinery it is desirable to give a large measure of permanence and stability. Therefore the constitution may be changed at any time and to any effect which the will of the people requires; but only by a method well devised to make it certain that this change is desired not by the passionate, impulsive, and temporary will of the people, but by its careful, instructed, and deliberate will.

AMENDMENTS, HOW MADE. Congress may propose amendments, or may call a convention to propose amendments, if the legislatures of two-thirds of the severnl States ask for it; and amendments made by Congress or by that convention are valid as parts of the constitution, when they are ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the States, or by conventions in three-fourths thereof, as either mode may be proposed by Congress.

Experience thus far has justified the framers of the constitution in believing this method would render it sufficiently easy for the people to change the constitution whenever they did certainly and unmistakably desire it, and sufficiently guarded to protect the constitution from any change which was not so desired.

By the Congress which met in New York, in 1789, the first ten articles of amendment were proposed and ratified in that year, in 1790, and 1791. They were all founded upon wishes or recommendations presented by different States, when adopting the constitution.

In 1793 was proposed the eleventh article of amendment, which was ratified. In 1803, the twelfth article ; in 1865, the thirteenth article ; in 1868, the fourteenth article; in 1870, the fifteenth article. These articles are published in preceding pages, in connection with the constitution.



This is a Roman, that is to say, a Latin word. By the ancient constitution of Rome, the people were divided into six classes, according to their wealth; those few only who possessed a very large sum being in the first class, and the required sum diminishing in the others, down to the sixth class, which was composed of those who had nothing, or too little to entitle them to admission in any higher class. That this classification might be made, every Roman citizen was required to come on a certain day to an open place in the city, and there declare, under oath, his name, dwelling, children, and the value of his property, under penalty of being scourged and losing all his goods. This enumeration took place every five years, and was called a census. I have described it briefly, to show that this periodical enumeration was made for political purposes, being required by the classification of the citizens, who then voted in the classes thus formed. Of the censuses taken among different nations in different ages, all have been for some political purpose, from the time when a decree went forth from Cæsar Augustus “ that all the world should be taxed, and all went to be taxed (or to be registered for the purpose of taxation), every one unto his own city," to our own day.

As by our constitution political power was given mainly in proportion to numbers, it was essential that an enumeration should be made from time to time; and the constitution provided that the requisite enumeration should be made within three years after the first meeting of Congress, and within every ten years afterwards.

The first Congress ordered the first census, which was taken in 1790, and a census has been taken every ten years since. It was apparent that at first there was little thought of learning more by the census than what was requisite to distribute political power among the people, in accordance with the requirement of the constitution ; for the first census only contained and enumerated the free white males of sixteen years and upwards, the same under that age, the number of females, and the number of slaves, and the number of heads of families.


Veenstringen Since then, however, the science of Statistics has received


mense development. It is the object of this science to collect, and arrange all facts which have an important bear GRAN the resources, the growth, the political, financial, intellectual, industrial, social, physical, and moral condition of a nation. Societies have been formed, journals published, and meetings held of men interested in such facts, from various countries, all intended to promote this science. It was seen at once that our census afforded a most important and serviceable instrument for that purpose. Every succeeding census has been made more instructive, by increasing the subjects of inquiry and improving their classification. At present, among the topics concerning which inquiry is made and information recorded, may be enumerated the number of families, of houses, the sex, age, color, birthplace, occupation, profession, or trade, of every person, the married and the widowed, the deaf and dumb, blind, idiotio or insane, with the age and sex of each; the age, sex, color, occupation, and birthplace of every one who had died within the year of enumeration and before the day thereof, with the cause thereof. Also the value of property; the number of acres improved or unimproved; their value, their productions, with the number, kinds, and value of the live-stock owned, and of agricultural implements and machinery; the number and kinds of educational institutions, with the number of scholars and of teachers, and their revenue; and the number of those who cannot read and write; also inquiries concerning mines, manufactures, and fisheries are included, so as to ascertain the amount of capital invested, the motive power employed, the number of persons of each sex employed and the wages paid, the quantity, kind, and value of raw materials used, and the quantity, kind, and value of the products.

Already has the information thus acquired been of great use in the national and State legislation, and also in regulating or suggesting private enterprises. And as time goes on, and experience shows how to make the census more useful, its beneficial results will be greater, more clearly seen, and more widely acknowledged. Many of the States have provided by law for a census within each State, at periods intermediate between those of the national census.

We annex to this chapter some instructive tables, giving to the reader the means of comparing this country with other countries in Europe, Asia, and Australia, and then with each other, upon interesting points.

For example, by Table I. he will find that the United States

1 We take these tables, by permission, from a valuable and instructive work, entitled The Statesman's Manual,” published by Macmillan & Co., London and New York.

« SebelumnyaLanjutkan »