The Pacific Reporter, Volume 115West Publishing Company, 1911 |
Dari dalam buku
Hasil 1-5 dari 100
Halaman 2
... proper case that no presumption can be raised against the defendant by reason of his refusal to testify ; but , where the defendant voluntarily submits himself as a witness in his own behalf , he may be cross - examined by the state ...
... proper case that no presumption can be raised against the defendant by reason of his refusal to testify ; but , where the defendant voluntarily submits himself as a witness in his own behalf , he may be cross - examined by the state ...
Halaman 4
... proper matters to worst kind of influences and surroundings , submit to the jury for their consideration . and at the age of six or seven years the father shot and killed defendant's mother , and then shot his brother , after which he ...
... proper matters to worst kind of influences and surroundings , submit to the jury for their consideration . and at the age of six or seven years the father shot and killed defendant's mother , and then shot his brother , after which he ...
Halaman 5
... proper cross - examination . The correct- ness of this rule must be measured and de- termined by the statute ( section 6079 , Rev. Codes ) , which reads as follows : " The op- posite party may cross - examine the witness as to any facts ...
... proper cross - examination . The correct- ness of this rule must be measured and de- termined by the statute ( section 6079 , Rev. Codes ) , which reads as follows : " The op- posite party may cross - examine the witness as to any facts ...
Halaman 6
... proper cross - examination . lows : " The court instructs the jury that the People v . Arrighini , 122 Cal . 121 , 54 Pac . character of the accused person is , in law , 593. It was error for the court to overrule presumed to be good ...
... proper cross - examination . lows : " The court instructs the jury that the People v . Arrighini , 122 Cal . 121 , 54 Pac . character of the accused person is , in law , 593. It was error for the court to overrule presumed to be good ...
Halaman 7
... proper , and ought to have been answered . The other was not a proper question on cross - examination . It would not have been a correct statement of the rule applicable to the facts in this case to have told the jury that the defendant ...
... proper , and ought to have been answered . The other was not a proper question on cross - examination . It would not have been a correct statement of the rule applicable to the facts in this case to have told the jury that the defendant ...
Edisi yang lain - Lihat semua
Istilah dan frasa umum
action admissible affidavit affirmed alleged APPEAL AND ERROR appellant attorney bank cause Cent charged claim Code Company complaint Constitution contract counsel county seat CRIMINAL LAW damages death deceased declared decree deed defendant defendant's dence denied District Court entitled evidence facts fendant filed held homestead Idaho indictment instruction issue judge judgment jurisdiction jurors jury land lease Madge Morey ment Michael Carr Mont motion MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS Nez Perce county Note Note.-For NUMBER in Dec offense Oklahoma Olsen & Johnson ordinance parties Pawhuska payment person petition plaintiff plaintiff in error pleadings proceedings prosecution purchase question real property reason record Rep'r Indexes respondent rule Sanpete county section NUMBER Series & Rep'r sexual intercourse statute street Superior Court Supreme Court testator testified testimony thereof tion topic and section trial court trust verdict Wash witness writ
Bagian yang populer
Halaman 105 - To constitute notice of an infirmity in the instrument or defect in the title of the person negotiating the same, the person to whom it is negotiated must have had actual knowledge of the infirmity or defect, or knowledge of such facts that his action in taking the instrument amounted to bad faith.
Halaman 230 - That the said party of the first part for and in consideration of the sum of five hundred dollars ($500.00), lawful money of the United States of America, to them in hand paid by the said party of the second part...
Halaman 382 - It is a general and undisputed proposition of law that a municipal corporation possesses and can exercise the following powers, and no others: First, those granted in express words; second, those necessarily or fairly implied in or incident to the powers expressly granted; third, those essential to the declared objects and purposes of the corporation — not simply convenient, but indispensable.
Halaman 318 - A corporation or association may be sued in the county where the contract is made or is to be performed, or where the obligation or liability arises, or the breach occurs; or in the county where the principal place of business of such corporation is situated, subject to the power of the Court to change the place of trial as in other cases.
Halaman 206 - Except general appropriation bills, and bills for the codification and general revision of laws, no bill shall be passed containing more than one subject, which shall be clearly expressed in its title.
Halaman 23 - The verdict of a jury is either general or special. A general verdict Is that by which they pronounce generally upon all or any of the issues, either in favor of the plaintiff or defendant: a special verdict is that by which the jury find the facts only, leaving the judgment to the court.
Halaman 388 - ... to provide for the safety, preserve the health, promote the prosperity, improve the morals, order, comfort, and convenience of such corporations and the inhabitants thereof...
Halaman 436 - ... satisfaction of the jury, by a preponderance of the evidence; and a reasonable doubt of the defendant's sanity, raised by all the evidence, does not authorize an acquittal.
Halaman 311 - ... to hatred, contempt, ridicule or obloquy, or which causes, or tends to cause any person to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency to injure any person, corporation or association of persons, in his or their business or occupation, is a libel.
Halaman 431 - Any person may be made a defendant who has or claims an interest in the controversy adverse to the plaintiff, or who is a necessary party to a complete determination or settlement of the question involved therein.