.304 8 F.(2d) Ohio Sav. Bank & Trust Co. v. Willys Cor- 65 Page Carasaljo Hotel Co., In re (C. C. A. N. J.) 469 Culgoa, The (D. C. N. J.).. Daeufer-Lieberman Brewing Co. v. United Doehler Die Casting Co. v. Gearhart Knit- 1018 62 1 .1019 138 Riess v. Kerr S. S. Co. (C. C. A. N. Y.)..1021 Robin Gray, The (C. C. A. N. Y.). .1021 Robin Line S. S. Co. v. Socony No. 16, The (C. C. A. N. Y.)... Du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. White (C. C. A. N. J.).. 5 .1021 Dyer, In re (D. C. N. J.). 376 Rockwood v. General Fire Extinguisher Co. (C. C. A. N. Y.) 682 Sagatind, The (D. C. N. Y.) Shapiro, In re (C. C. A. N. Y.). Sherwood v. American Sugar Refining Co. (C. C. A. N. Y.). 788 .1022 Electric Reduction Co. v. Lewellyn (D. C. Pa.) E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. White (C. C. A. N. J.).. 5 91 586 Socony No. 16, The (C. C. A. N. Y.). .1021 Standard Transp. Co. v. Robin Gray, The (C. C. A. N. Y.) .1021 Sutherland & Co. v. United States (D. C. N. Y.).. Fletcher Co. v. Culgoa, The (D. C. N. J.). 62 508 777 358 Longcor v. Delaware, L. & W. R. Co. (C. C. A. N. J.). 138 591 United States v. Columbus Marine Corporation (D. C. N. Y.).... McGinnis v. Corporation Funding & Finance Co. (D. C. Pa.) 532 315 United States v. Commissioner of Immigration at Port of New York (D. C. N. Y.) Marine Works v. Gallagher (C. C. A. N. J.) 469 481 362 788 United States v. Curran (C. C. A. N. Y.) 355 432 United States v. Hudnut (D. C. N. Y.)...1010 Mitchell v. Cramp (C. C. A. Pa.) Ryan v. Delaware, L. & W. R. Co. (C. C. Star Ball Player Co. v. Baseball Display 112 138 Schute v. Hildreth (C. C. A. Pa.) 131 9 .109 46 791 54 41 267 785 United States v. 2,180 Cases of Champagne (D. C. N. Y.). 764 United States v. Wexler (D. C. N. Y.). 880 W. & A. Fletcher Co. v. Culgoa, The (D. 62 FOURTH CIRCUIT. 763 Bank of Grottoes v. Brown (C. C. Va.) A. 321 Van Dyk v. Young (C. C. A. N. Y.). Villigas v. United States (D. C. N. Y.)... Walter Tracy, The (C. C. A. N. Y.) Warford, The Benj. H. (C. C. A. N. Y.). Warford, The Benj. H. (D. C. N. Y.).. Willard Sutherland & Co. v. United States 716 300 Bardach Iron & Steel Co. v. Morgan (C. C. A. Md.). 599 591 Bensaude & Co. v. United States (D. C. 65 S. C.) 61 63 (D. C. N. Y.) 358 W. R. Grace & Co. v. United States (D. C. N. Y.) Cincinnati Northern R. Co. v. Beveridge (D. C. Va.).... 372 80 City of Beaumont, The (C. C. A. Md.) 599 Continental Ins. Co. v. Simpson (C. C. A. Zeehond, The (D. C. N. Y.) 763 Va.) 439 THIRD CIRCUIT. Crouch v. United States (C. C. A. Va.). 435 Cullom v. Kearns (C. C. A. N. C.).. 437 Auchenbach v. Philadelphia & R. R. Co. Dispatch II, The (D. C. Va.). 426 (C. C. A. N. J.). 350 Eva Leigh, The (D. C. Va.). 426 Banos, In re (D. C. Pa.). 95 Farmers' Bank of Greenville v. Blount (C. C. A. N. C.).... 443 Bower, Petition of (D. C. Pa.). 111 Fleischman Yeast Co. v. Federal Yeast Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. Victor Forsyth Furniture Lines v. Druckman (C. 311 C. A. N. C.) 212 312 Isner v. United States (C. C. A. W. Va.).. 487 8 F.(2d) Di Torio, In re (D. C. Ill.) Pandolfo v. Biddle (C. C. A. Kan.) 142 279 144 995 490 609 Indiana Nat. Bank of Indianapolis, Ind., v. Kriebel v. United States (C. C. A. Ill)........ 692 McCarren v. United States (C. C. A. Ill.) 113 Maginn v. Diamond T. Motor Car Co. (C. Mutual Bldg. & Sav. Ass'n v. Wilkinson 121 Straesser-Arnold Co. v. Franklin Sugar Refining Co. (C. C. A. Ill.). 601 Swift & Co. v. Federal Trade Commission (C. C. A.).. 595 Tank v. United States (C. C. A. Wis.). 697 Wagner v. United States (C. C. A. Mo.).. 581 Webb v. United States (C. C. A. Okl.). 145 Wheeler & Motter Mercantile Co. v. Lamerton (C. C. A. Okl.).. 957 484 Cook v. Alaska S. S. Co. (D. C. Wash.).. 207 316 922 Fire Protection Co. v. Hawkeye Tire & Rubber Co. (C. C. A. Iowa)... First Nat. Bank in St. Louis v. Buder (D. C. Mo.).... Wash.) 224 883 Gaertner v. Dragich (C. C. A. Cal.).. 568 729 871 Trenholm v. Southern Pac. Co. (C. C. A. Or.) 452 706 608 489 United States v. Charles (D. C. Cal.). 302 759 645 United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. 455 Page Gay v. United States (C. C. A. Wash.)... 219 Gin Bock Sing v. United States (C. Č. A. Cal.) 976 Gorham v. United States (C. C. A. Cal.).. 251 Gray & Barash v. Luckenbach S. S. Co. (C. C. A. Wash.). Hadsell v. United States (C. C. A. Cal.).. 989 Heerdt v. Portland, Or. (D. C. Or.). Hewitt v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United States (C. C. A. Wash.). Jacobs v. United States (C. C. A. Cal.) 981 Jutila v. Frye (C. C. A. Idaho). Kee How v. Weedin (C. C. A. Wash.) Kissane v. United States (C. C. A. Cal.) 251 Kuehn v. United States (C. C. A. Idaho) 265 Lapique v. District Court of United States, in and for Southern Dist. of California (C. C. A. Cal.). 869 Lorang v. Alaska S. S. Co. (D. C. Wash.) 206 Lorraine v. Townsend (C. C. A. Cal.).... 673 Los Angeles & S. L. R. Co. v. United States (D. C. Cal.) 747 209 488 Weedin v. Moy Fat (C. C. A. Wash.). Marron v. United States (C. C. A. Cal.) .. 251 Maryland Casualty Co. v. Citizens' Nat. Bank (C. C. A. Cal.).. 216 Pielow v. United States (C. C. A. Wash.) 492 Rasmussen v. United States (C. C. A. Wash.) Merrell v. Evans (D. C. Idaho) Mitchell v. Cunningham (C. C. A. Wash.) 813 946 607 354 431 801 629 Chesapeake Western Ry. v. Jardine (App. D. C.).. 794 518 352 948 Dickinson v. Dickinson (App. D. C.). 909 .1014 ..1012 559 669 792 .1015 : 911 .1015 902 .1015 Pittsburgh (C. C. A. Idaho) Sartori v. Archer (C. C. A. Wash.) 355 United States ex rel. Carroll Electric Co. v. McCarl (App. D. C.)... 910 Shelley, In re (D. C. Cal.). Staley v. Medford (D. C. Or.) 314 Stein, In re (C. C. A. Cal.). 11 Stein, In re (C. C. A. Cal.). 13 Stipcich v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (D. C. Or.) 285 CASES ARGUED AND DETERMINED IN THE CIRCUIT COURTS OF APPEALS AND DISTRICT COURTS OF mit does not protect from search. Permit under which brewery was operating did not protect it from search under valid search warrant. 3. Intoxicating liquors 249, 250-Search warrant may be addressed to, and executed by prohibition agent; "civil officer." Warrant for search of brewery is valid, though addressed to and executed by a prohibition agent; such an agent being a civil "officer" within Const. art. 2, § 2, and provision of Espionage Act incorporated in National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 101384 et seq.), providing for enforcement of prohibition law by civil officers. [Ed. Note.-For other definitions, see Words and Phrases, First and Second Series, Civil 'Officer.] 4. Intoxicating liquors 246-Claim of unlawful seizure because of prior seizure by state officers held not available as defense to libel by United States. Claim of seizure of liquor by federal officers being unlawful, because made of property already seized by state officials and therefore in custodia legis, is not available as defense to libel of the liquor by the United States; state officers, who made first seizure, having voluntarily surrendered the property to federal officers, and it having been entirely out of pos session of state officers when libel was filed. 8 F. (2d)-1 5. Intoxicating liquors 250-Libel to enforce forfeitures available, though not specifically prescribed by National Prohibition Act. Though National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 101384 et seq.) does not specifically prescribe that its provisions in respect to forfeitures shall be enforced by libel, such proceeding, having long been used to enforce federal statutes where property is sought to be forfeited or destroyed, and being available and appropriate, is valid. 6. Intoxicating liquors 246-Utensils used and intended to be used in violation of act properly forfeited. Under National Prohibition Act, tit. 2, § 25 (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 101381⁄2m), machinery and utensils of a brewery, if used or intended to be used in violation of the act, questions of fact, are properly included in decree of forfeiture, and ordered to be destroyed. 7. Intoxicating liquors 250-Libel not sustained by possession under unlawful seizure. Seizure of liquors and utensils as used or intended to be used in violation of National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 101384 et seq.), being in an illegal way, so that the government's possession was unlawful, such possession cannot sustain a libel for -forfeiture and destruction of the property. On Petition for Rehearing. 8. Intoxicating liquors 250-Government's unlawful possession when filing libel for forfeiture not aided by subsequent attachment. Government's unlawful possession of liquor and utensils, when it filed libel for their forfeiture and destruction, was not made lawful subsequent attachment of the property. as of that time, so as to sustain the libel by Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Oliver B. Dickinson, Judge. Libel by the United States against 2,719 barrels, more or less, of beer, etc., claimed by the Daeufer-Lieberman Brewing Company, Inc. There was a decree of forfei |