 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1882 - 912 halaman
...railroad between certain points, without describing its course and direction, * * * does not, prima facie, give any power to lay out the road over land...given in express words or by necessary implication. Citing Springfield v. Connecticut River Railroad, 4 Cush. 72. " A general authority to lay out a railroad... | |
 | Horace Gay Wood - 1885 - 758 halaman
...plaintiff' in error that the evidence shows that more land was included in the upjier laws, does not prima facie give any power to lay out the road over land...not to be presumed that the legislature intended to parcel of land sought to be condemned allow land thus devoted to one public use than was necessary... | |
 | 1901 - 1166 halaman
...direction, but leaving that to be determined and established by the corporation, does not prima fncle give any power to lay out the road over land already devoted to, and within the recorded limits of, another railroad. The court said that it Is not to be presumed that the legislature Intended... | |
 | 1887 - 764 halaman
...recorded location of the Stockbridge & Pittsfleld R. Co. which endanger the safety of that road. ... It is not to be presumed that the legislature intended...devoted to one public use to be subjected to another. . . . And it does not appear that there was any physical necessity that the defendant's location should... | |
 | 1896 - 772 halaman
...that to be determined by the corporation as provided by the general laws, does not prima facie confer power to lay out The road over land already devoted...within the recorded location of another railroad. Housatonic R. Co. v. Lee & HR Co., n8 Mass. 391. The right of one corporation to take away the franchise... | |
 | Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals - 1900 - 1106 halaman
...railroad between certain points, without describing its course and direction, * * * does not, prima facie, give any power to lay out the road over land...given in express words or by necessary implication (citing Springfield v. Connecticut River Railroad, 4 Cush. 72) . "A general authority to lay out a... | |
 | Sophie Bishop Kent - 1908 - 116 halaman
...between certain points without describing its course and direction, did not give power to lay out its road over land already devoted to and within the recorded location of another railroad. Imlay vs. Union Branch R. Co. held that land taken for a highwaj Karveyvs. Thomas, 10 Watts, 63. Leeds... | |
 | 1901 - 1414 halaman
...and direction, but leaving that to be determined and established by the corporation, does not prima facie give any power to lay out the road over land already devoted to, and within the recorded limits of, another railroad. The court said that it Is not to be presumed that the legislature intended... | |
 | Kansas. Supreme Court, Elliot V. Banks, William Craw Webb, Asa Maxson Fitz Randolph, Gasper Christopher Clemens, Thomas Emmet Dewey, Llewellyn James Graham, Oscar Leopold Moore, Earl Hilton Hatcher, Howard Franklin McCue - 1904 - 994 halaman
...to be determined and established by the corporation, as provided by the general laws, does not prima facie give any power to lay out the road over land...necessary implication. And such implication can only Railway Co. v. Railway Co. be found in the language of the act, or from the application of the act... | |
| |
... does not prima facie give any power to lay out the road over land already devoted to and within the recorded location of another railroad. It is not to be presumed that the legislature intended to allow land thus devoted to one public use to be subjected... 