Opinions Per Curiam, etc. No. 394. INDIANA POWER COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. ST. JOSEPH AND ELKHART POWER COMPANY. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Indiana. Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted October 14, 1902. Decided October 20, 1902. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction, on the authority of Pim v. St. Louis, 165 U. S. 273; Cook County v. Dock Company, 138 U. S. 635; Dewey v. Des Moines, 173 U. S. 193, 200; Mining Company v. McFadden, 180 U. S. 535. Mr. Frank F. Reed and Mr. Ferdinand Winter for the plaintiff in Mr. Charles Francis Carusi for the defendant in error. error. Nos. 328, 329 and 330. CHARLES T. CARNAHAN, Plaintiff IN ERROR, V. P. K. CONNOLLY. In error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Colorado. Motion to dismiss submitted October 20, 1902. Decided October 27, 1902. Per Curiam. Writs of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction on the authority of Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Harrison v. Morton, 171 U. S. 38; Erie Railroad Company v. Purdy, 185 U. S. 148, and other cases; and see Carnahan v. Connolly, 68 Pac. Rep. 836. Mr. Charles J. Hughes, Jr., for the plaintiff in error. Mr. C. S. Thomas, Mr. W. H. Bryant and Mr. H. H. Lee for the defendant in error. No. 60. WILLIAM A. CALVERT, ADMINISTRATOR, ETC., PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY. In error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of South Carolina. Argued October 31, 1902. Decided November 3, 1902. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of St. Louis and San Francisco Railway Company v. James, 161 U. S. 545 ; and see Calvert v. Southern Railway Company, 64 S. C. 143; 41 S. E. Rep. 963. Mr. William N.Graydon for the plaintiff in error. Mr. George E. Hamilton and Mr. Fairfax Harrison for the defendant in error. No. 15. CLARENCE E. COLLINS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. STATE Opinions Per Curiam, etc. OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of New Hampshire. Argued and submitted January 7 and 8, 1902. Restored to docket for reargument January 20, 1902. Reargued April 17, 1902; November 10, 1902. Judg ment affirmed, with costs, by an equally divided court. Mr. Wm. D. Guthrie and Mr. A. H. Veeder for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Edwin G. Eastman for the defendant in error. No. 361. ELIZA A. WALL, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. OLD COLONY TRUST COMPANY ET AL. In error to the Supreme Judicial Court of the State of Massachusetts. Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted November 3, 1902. Decided November 10, 1902. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction on the authority of Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; and see Wall v. Old Colony Trust Company, 174 Massachusetts, 340; 177 Massachusetts, 275. Mr. L. L. Scaife for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Felix Rackemann, Mr. Moorfield Story, Mr. Ezra R. Thayer, Mr. J. L. Thorndike and Mr. L. S. Dabney for the defendants in error. No. 91. MARTHA E. SMITH ET AL., PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. EDWARD F. BROWN, RECEIVER, ETC. In error to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Argued and submitted November 13, 1902. Decided November 17, 1902. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Studebaker v. Perry, 184 U. S. 258; McDonald v. Thompson, 184 U. S. 71; United States v. Knox, 102 U. S. 422, (see case below, Deweese v. Smith, 106 Fed. Rep. 438,) and case remanded to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri. Mr. Wm. M. Williams for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. William S. Shirk for the defendant in error. No. 400. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, APPELLANT, v. ELIAS E. BARNES. Appeal from the Court of Claims. Motion to dis Opinions Per Curiam, etc. miss. Submitted November 17, 1902. Decided December 8, 1902. Per Curiam. Appeal dismissed. Act of June 6, 1900, 31 Stat. c. 789, p. 572; Gordon v. United States, 117 U. S. 697; 2 Wall. 561; District of Columbia v. Eslin, 183 U. S. 62, 65. Mr. Solicitor General Richards and Mr. Robert A. Howard for the appellant. Mr. John C. Fay for the appellee. No. 438. FERDINAND SIEGEL ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. S. L. SWARTS, TRUSTEE. Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Motion to dismiss. Submitted December 1, 1902. Decided December 8, 1902. Per Curiam. Appeal dismissed for the want of jurisdiction, on the authority of Bogy v. Daugherty, 184 U. S. 696; Haseltine v. Central Bank, 183 U. S. 130; Keystone Manganese and Iron Company v. Martin, 132 U. S. 91. Mr. Edward C. Eliot for the appellants. Mr. David Goldsmith for the appellee. No. 374. GEORGE F. HARDING, APPELLANT, v. JOHN S. HART ET AL. Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Motion to dismiss. Submitted December 1, 1902. Decided December 15, 1902. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction on the authority of Huguley Manufacturing Company v. Galeton Cotton Mills, 184 U. S. 290, 294, and cases cited; Rouse v. Letcher, 156 U. S. 47, and see Harding v. Hart, 186 U. S. 483. Mr. A. A. Hoehling, Jr., for the appellant. Mr. Frederic Ullman and Mr. D. J. Schuyler for the appellees. No. 128. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. KATE G. WOLFE, ADMINISTRATRIX, ETC. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Nebraska. Argued December 17, 1902. Decided December 22, 1902. Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with costs, on the authority of Chicago, Rock Island &c. Railroad Company v. Zernecke, 183 U. S. 582. Mr. J. W. Deweese and Mr. Charles F. Manderson Decisions on Petitions for Writs of Certiorari. for the plaintiff in error. Mr. T. J. Mahoney for the defend ant in error. NESSEE. nessee. No. 156. N. T. COOK, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. STATE OF TENIn error to the Supreme Court of the State of TenMotion to dismiss. Submitted January 5, 1903. Decided January 12, 1903. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction on the authority of Haseltine v. Savings Bank of Springfield, Mo., 183 U. S. 130; Bogy v. Daugherty, 184 U. S. 696. Mr. E. W. Ross for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Charles T. Cates, Jr., for the defendant in error. No. 162. ANNIE WRIGHT SEMINARY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. CITY OF TACOMA. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Washington. Submitted December 22, 1902. Decided January 12, 1903. Per Curiam. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction on the authority of Gillis v. Stinchfield, 159 U. S. 658; Pittsburgh Company v. Cleveland Company, 178 U. S. 279; Speed v. McCarthy, 181 U. S. 269, 275. See case below, 23 Washington, 109. Mr. John F. Shafroth for the plaintiff in Mr. David A. Gourick for the defendant in error. error. Decisions on Petitions for Writs of Certiorari. No. 342. ALLEGHENY OIL COMPANY ET AL., PETITIONERS, v. HIRAM A. SNYDER ET AL. October 20, 1902. Petition for a writ of certiorari to United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied. Mr. S. Schoyer, Jr., for the petitioners. Mr. Edward McSweeney and Mr. D. A. Hollingsworth for the respondents. Decisions on Petitions for Writs of Certiorari. No. 399. BOSTON FRUIT COMPANY, PETITIONER, V. A. G. HALL ET AL. October 20, 1902. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied. Mr. J. L. Thorndike and Mr. Charles Theodore Russell for the petitioner. Mr. J. Parker Kirlin for the respond ents. No. 408. PACIFIC COAST COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. W. H. REYNOLDS ET AL. October 20, 1902. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied. Mr. George W. Towle, Jr., and Mr. Thomas B. Reed for the petitioner. No appearance for the respondents. No. 439. GUARANTEE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, PETITIONER, V. PHENIX INSURANCE COMPANY OF BROOKLYN, N. Y. October 20, 1902. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied. Mr. Warren Switzler for the petitioner. Mr. H. C. Brome for the respondent. No. 442. SWAIN P. CHICK ET AL., PETITIONERS, v. ALLEN C. FULLER ET AL. October 20, 1902. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied. Mr. William J. Manning and Mr. James H. Barnard for the petitioners. Mr. Charles H. Aldrich and Mr. Frank F. Reed for the respondents. No. 453. CHICAGO AND ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. WILLIAM N. SHAW. October 20, 1902. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied. Mr. W. II. H. Miller and Mr. W. O. Johnson for the petitioner. Mr. James C. McShane for the respondent. |