of the race. But the Hebraic principle was right. The scheme that gives the moral and religious nature dominance is the only philosophical scheme and will prove itself competent to meet the wants of the world. Neither knowledge nor intellectual training can be an end. There is something higher and better. But nothing beyond character, conceived in its largest sense as the end of existence, can be rationally assumed. The end of education is character conceived as completeness of being and harmony with the mind of God.

Religion also emphasizes the spiritual conditions of the apprehension and appropriation of truth. Education encounters the weightiest problems of human existence. They are problems which the intellect cannot solve, although trained unto the utmost. Some sorts of knowledge refuse to enter the gateways of the intellect. The most momentous questions of existence touch the moral and religious nature of man. How we feel and how we behave are of some account in the solution of them. The truth is for the true. The man who is in sympathy with it and docile before it shall hear its voice. The profoundest questions of life are solved practically not speculatively. One may know in one sort what in another "passeth knowledge." Knowledge in the deepest sense is not simply the response of the mind, but of the whole moral and religions. manhood to the truth. Some delicacy of moral fiber, some training of the higher power of the soul is necessary. There is a capacity of religious presentiment. The heart and conscience sense what the intellect does not yet fully see. There is a knowledge of feeling before that of seeing. truths are felt. The saint knows some things the philosopher does not. The soul of the Hebrew went deeper into the universe than the intellect of the Greek. Moses knew what Plato did not. Religion holds with confidence what perpetually bewilders science. It has found the heart of the universe while. science has been looking up the bones and muscles. moreover, recognizes the existence of evil in man. therefore, something to be undone as well as done. ity is not the only barrier to be overcome. into completeness. Education in its comprehensive aspects

The first

Religion,

There is, ImmaturMen do not grow

must meet the fact of sin. Secular education would meet it by ignoring it, but still it remains to counter-work its best

efforts. Religion applies remedial agencies, introduces new principles and motives and develops life from a new basis. And in this connection it is to be observed that religion insists upon the control of the unselfish principle in the work of education. An education that makes the individual supreme and ignores the kingdom of God is fatally perverted. It is the unselfish principle that secures to the world at large the advantage of education and gives assurance that its results shall be a blessing and not an evil to the world. It not only gives us a conception of humanity, and faith in it, but love and devotion for it. It makes the kingdom of God in a humanity redeemed and trained into completeness the end of the individual effort, and keeps before men the fact that the individual never attains to completeness in isolation from humanity. The end of history is the education of a race. Unselfishness is necessary to any best personal training. A selfish scheme of education would be fatal to true manhood. How we feel and bear ourselves towards our fellows and towards a higher power is of more consequence to our own manhood than to anything else in the universe. It determines what sort of development and training we are getting. We are not isolated personalities. The background of our being binds us to the universe of being. God is training a race here on earth. Our training is inseparably linked to that of the race. Christianity with its philanthropy has wrought more mightily than any other agency towards the education of the race. It furnishes the mightiest of all incentives to the individual soul in its striving for the goal of its existence, but its highest good is humanity, "come in the unity of faith and of the knowledge of the son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ," a "building fitly framed together grown into an holy temple in the Lord." It is good philosophy as well as religion that one must save life by losing it. We need in the secularism and individualism of the time more of the old Gentile Gospel of a redeemed humanity. We need more of the spirit of the great apostle who laid the products of his best training at the foot of the cross, and labored everywhere to lift men back into the dignity of their being and into fellowship with God. Education does not know itself till it understands the prayer of Christ, "Thy kingdom come, thy will be done."

ARTICLE III.-THE FUNCTION OF THE WILL IN KNOWLEDGE.

[From the French of EDMOND DE PRESSENSÉ; by Rev. J. B. CHASE, Cherokee, Iowa.*]

THE CONDITIONS OF CERTAINTY.

THE participation of the will is absolutely necessary not only for the establishment of moral certainty, but even for that which is purely intellectual. I do not now refer to that merely permissive act which takes place every time we put forth a conscious effort; but I speak of that positive determination of the will in obedience to which the mind proceeds to the elaboration of knowledge, the object perhaps being entirely intellectual, and without consideration thus far of its moral truth properly so called. By this process alone can we attain to what can be worthily called knowledge. We attain the desired end through a degree of attention called reflection, and which implies both the concentration of our cognitive faculties, and the isolation through an effort of the mind of the object under contemplation. This effort puts the object under our direct mental vision, and sets up an energetic reaction against the dispersion of ideas by distractions from without.

2d. Every judgment which applies an attribute to any substance implies an act of the will; for the bestowal of this attribute implies comparison among other attributes and choice. There is no truth of any kind whatever that does not claim our assent before it can be appropriated or possessed. This assent or consent is more than a simple passive affirmation.†

This extract is taken from chapter 1st of a work just published by Edmond de Pressensé, a name which has acquired some little renown in the modern struggles of French Protestantism. The book is entitled "Les Origines," and contains five principal chapters, viz: I. The Problem of Knowledge; II. The Cosmological Problem; III. The Anthropological Problem; IV. The Origin of Morality and Religion; V. The Primitive Man.

+ Ollé-Laprune, "La Certitude Morale," chap. II.

An error is always caused by negligence or slothfulness of mind, which has paused too soon in its researches. We must not confound this pause with the simple limitation of our knowledge. Error begins from the moment when by a hasty affirmation we have drawn too hasty conclusions from an incomplete examination. Descartes makes some very wise remarks on this subject, showing the plane to which he descended to lay the foundations of liberty. "If," says he, "I abstain from giving my judgment on anything when my acquaintance with it is not sufficiently decisive and clear, I evidently do right and make no mistake. But if I decide to affirm or deny it, then I do not use my free will as I ought. It is in the bad use of the free will that I find the hindrance which constitutes the framework of error."*

Malebranche is no less explicit than Descartes concerning the moral defect implied by human errors. "We are free, says he, "in our false judgments as we are in our illicit loves. The human mind is not subject to error, merely because it is finite, and less extended thau the objects which it considers; it is also subject to error from its own fickleness. To understand the cause of this fickleness, we must recognize the fact that the will controls the action of the mind; that it directs the mind toward objects which it loves, itself remaining constantly active and restless."+

No one has written more truly and more profoundly on this subject than the great theologian Schleiermacher in his posthumous articles on the life of Jesus. "Truth is man's natu ral condition. His faculties in their normal state ought always to tend in that direction. A condition of ignorance or doubt is not error. Error begins when the mind arrives at a false conclusion. To do this the mind must have too soon desisted in its search after truth. In other words, the mind has not loved truth as truth ought to have been loved; or perhaps it had some selfish interest in accepting this or that incomplete result. It is therefore impossible to detect with absolute certainty a malicious error, and still less one which concerns the order of truths as they present themselves to the consciousness and soul."+

* Descartes, "Meditations."

+ Malebranche, vol. i., p. 30.

Schleiermacher, "Leben Jesus,” p. 118.

It is indeed for this kind of truths that the function of the will is specially important, for we must not overlook the fact that when traced back to their most general form, even to the categorical imperative of Kant, they come into conflict with all the lower tendencies of our nature. These truths are obli

gations before they appeal to the senses. They command obedience but do not impose themselves upon the thought with any such sort of dialectic necessity as comes from the absolute result of reasoning. Their very nature implies that they can cease to exercise influence. The first duty is to think of the duty. But the duty is such that one can escape from it, and by so escaping the duty becomes lost to view. Moral truth appeals to the intuitions; but since the intuitions make no outward demonstration nothing hinders us from making our escape there. It is in this wide-reaching domain especially that reasoning often destroys reason. Practical reason is definitely accredited as pure reason by an à priori intuitive element of our nature beyond which we cannot go. Nothing is easier for us than to put ourselves out of condition, to grasp moral truth by simply allowing its delicate sense to become blunted. Nothing is easier than to suppress it entirely by substituting dialectics and its subtleties in the place of immediate intuition. Dialectics shuts up liberty, as it were, in a network of contradictions. And then liberty never can escape, except when the mind suddenly, by its own spontaneous energy, regains the lofty regions of intuition where consciousness lays down law without discussion-where duty has sovereign authority.

As soon as we pass from the realm of intuition, we meet determinism, for the only principles which escape the latter are the ultimate principles-those which lie as the foundation of all things. Above them every thing is made captive and put into the hopper. These alone escape the fatal entanglement because they are fundamentals, which they would not be if they were links in the chain. Moreover these fundamentals are only perceived by intuition. As soon as we pass from that realm we find no trace of their existence. When we discuss moral truth, intuition is only rendered possible by purity of heart, or at least by an honest desire for it. Pure souls only