 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1909 - 790 halaman
...derive a common benefit therefrom, the corporation quoad hoc is to be regarded as a private company. It stands on the same footing as would any individual or body of persons upon whom the like special franchises had been conferred." Although it was said in Davidson v. Hine, that " a municipal fire department... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1874 - 664 halaman
...derive a common benefit therefrom, the corporation quoad hoc is to be regarded as a private company. It stands on the same footing as would any individual or body of persons upon whom the like special franchises had been conferred." In San Francisco Gas Company v. San Francisco, 9 Cal., 433, it is held... | |
 | Murray Hoffman - 1853 - 456 halaman
...derive a common benefit therefrom, the Corporation, so far, is to be regarded as a private company. It stands on the same footing as would any individual or body of persons, upon whom the like special franchises had been conferred. It is upon the like distinction that municipal corporations, in their... | |
 | Nathan Howard (Jr.) - 1857 - 614 halaman
...regarded as a private company. He says, " It [the corporation] stands on the same footing as would an individual or body of persons upon whom the like special...affirmed in the court for the correction of errors. (2 Demo, 433.) In this case, Chief Justice NELSON puts a hypothetical case quite in point. He says, "... | |
 | 1857 - 610 halaman
...dealt with accordingly ; that they stood upon the same footing in this respect as would any person or body of persons upon whom the like special franchise had been conferred." I retain the opinion which I expressed in the case of Milhau against Sharp (15 Barb., 230), that these... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1920 - 684 halaman
...benefit therefrom, the corporation quo ad hoc is to be regarded as a private company. It stands upon the same footing as would any individual or body of persons upon whom the like special franchises had been conferred." (City of Chicago v. Selz, Schwab & Co. 202 11l. 545; Village of Palestine... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1907 - 750 halaman
...its capacity of a private corporation and not in the exercise of its police powers. It stands upon the same footing as would any individual or body of persons upon whom like special franchises had been conferred. ll'\1gner v. Rock Island, 146 111. 154. Where an injury... | |
 | Nathan Howard (Jr.) - 1861 - 618 halaman
...dealt with accordingly ; that they stood upon the same footing in this respect as would any person, or body of persons, upon whom the like special franchise had been conferred. The rights and privileges thus granted are altogether distinct and different from those with which... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1867 - 732 halaman
...respect to the powers conferred by these laws, is to be regarded as a private corporation, standing on the same footing as would any individual or body of persons upon whom like privileges had been conferred. Or, in the language of the court in Bailey v. The JUayor, £e.,... | |
 | Thomas McIntyre Cooley - 1868 - 776 halaman
...derive a common benefit therefrom, the corporation quo ad hoc is to be regarded as a private company. It stands on the same footing as would any individual or body of persons upon whom the like special franchises had been conferred.1 " Suppose the legislature, instead of the franchise in question, had... | |
| |
... purposes exclusively, they belong to the corporate body' in its public, political, or municipal character. But if the grant was for purposes of private advantage and emolument, though the public may derive a common benefit therefrom, the corporation... 
