« SebelumnyaLanjutkan »
CA SE S
ARGUED AND ADJUDGED
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES,
IN FEBRUARY TERM, 1809.
BY WILLIAM CRANCH,
POTIUS IGNORATIO JURIS LITIGIOSA EST, QUAM SCIENTIA.
· CIC. DE LEGIBUS, DIAL. I.
Printed and published by Isaac Riley.
DISTRICT OF NEW-YORK, er.
DE IT REMEMBERED, that on the fifth day of Pebruary, in
the thirty-seventh year of the Independence of the United States of America, ISAAC RILEY, of the said district, hath deposited in this office the title of a book, the right whereof he claims as proprietor, in the words following, to wit:
“ Reports of Cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of Co the United States, in February term, 1809. Vol. V by WILLIAM “CRANCH, Chief Judge of the Circuit Court of the District of Co“lumbia. Potius ignoratio juris litigiosa est, quam scientia.
" Cic de legibus, dial. i.”
IN CONFORMITY to the act of Congress of the United States, en. titled, “ An act for the encouragement of learning, by securing the “ copies of maps, charts and books, to the authors and proprietors of “ such copies, during the times therein mentioned ;” and also to an act, entitled, “ An act, supplementary to an act, entitled, an act for “ the encouragement of learning, by securing the copies of maps, “ charts and books, to the authors and proprietors of such copies, du. “ ring the times therein mentioned, and extending the benefits thereof " to the arts of designing, engraving and etching historical and other si prints."
PAGE Alexander v. Mayor, &c. of Fairfax's Executor v. Fairfax, 19 Alexandria,
Fry, Yeaton v. , 335 Arthur and Patterson, United , States v.
H Auld, Hepburn and Dundas v. 262 - v. Norwood,
361 Harrison v. Sterry and others, 289
Henderson v. Moore, B · Hepburn and Dundas v. Auld,
262 Bank of Alexandria v. Yeaton 49 Himely v. Rose, Young v. 45 Hodgkin, Dulany v.
333 Bank of United States v. De- Hodgson v. Mar. Ins. Co. of veaux et al. 61 Alexandria,
100 Boardman et al., Hope Insurance Hodgson and Thompson v. Bower. Company v. 57. bank and others,
303 Bodley et al. v. Taylor, 191. Hope Ins. Co. v. Boardman et al. Bowerbank and others, Hodgson
57 and Thompson v. . Brent v. Chapman,
358 Browi), Taylor and Quarles v. 234 Browne and others v. Strode, 303 Keene v. United States,. 304
Kempe's Lessee v. Kennedy, 174
L Chapinan, Brent v.
358 Cook and others. v. Woodrow, 13 Logan v. Patrick, Craig, Radford v.