Gambar halaman
PDF
ePub

the river, while the Illinois Constitution prohibited the introduction of slaves, and, therefore, the desire to make Illinois a slave State was increased. The change could be brought about only by amending the newly adopted Constitution. In order to do this it was necessary to get a twothirds vote of the legislature to recommend to the people the calling of a convention.

By the use of unfair means the required two-thirds vote was obtained and then followed a campaign which, for violence and personal abuse, is unequalled in the history of Illinois. This campaign lasted for eighteen months. Personal combats were frequent between members of the opposite parties, and the State seemed on the verge of civil war. Stump speeches and newspapers were made use of on both sides. One of the ablest champions of the antislavery people was the Baptist minister, J. M. Peck, who rode all through the southern part of the State and raised his voice in opposition to the convention. Nor should the zealous and efficient labors of George Flower be forgotten. He had established an English colony at Albion, Edwards County, in 1817, and his promotion of agricultural development and his benevolence brought him great influence, which was eminently serviceable in the defeat of the attempt to introduce slavery into the State.

When the vote was taken in August, 1824, it was found that four thousand nine hundred and fifty ballots were in favor of the convention and six thousand eight hundred and twenty-two against it. Thus it was decided for all time that Illinois should be a free State. The influence of that decision on the fortunes of the Civil War is beyond estimation.

The last slavery decision was made by the Supreme Court of Illinois in December, 1845, to the effect that the descendants of the old French slaves, born since 1787, and before or since the adoption of the Constitution of Illinois, could not be held in slavery.

When the Constitution of 1848 was adopted, the slavery clause was in the language of the Ordinance of 1787.

CHAPTER XVI

CHARACTER OF THE NORTHWEStern settLERS

BEFORE 1830

THERE were many diverse elements in the makeup of the population of the Northwest. Among these, three were especially important. The first of these in point of age, though not of influence, was the French. There were large numbers of these people in the Illinois country and in Detroit and its neighborhood up to 1830. It is difficult, however, to determine the exact extent of French influence, but it was of continually decreasing importance as the French came in contact with the vigorous and pushing pioneers from New England and New York. The French were conservative and could not understand the newcomers, who were so much interested in politics, religion, and education, and above all else, in making money.

In southern Michigan, especially in Detroit and the district centring on it, the French element was divided into classes. At the head of society was that class composed of persons of aristocratic descent and of inherited wealth. These constituted an intelligent and refined element in the society of the territory. A middle class was made up of the French farmers who cultivated their lands in the vicinity of Detroit in the ways of their forefathers and with the same primitive instruments. The lowest social stratum was made up of the Canadian boatmen and hunters, who found their occupation passing from them with the increase in population and the decline of the fur trade.

A second element in the population of the Northwest consisted of the pioneers from New England and New York who were called by their French neighbors by the despised term "Yankee." Large numbers of these came into Ohio, southern and central Illinois and Indiana, and later into southern Michigan. These northern pioneers, especially the early comers, were men of Puritan stock, and kept up the Puritan traditions in politics, religion, and education.

The third important element in the population was made up of emigrants from the South. In many ways they differed from their neighbors who had come from the North. They settled in the southern part of Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois, and brought with them markedly southern characteristics.

It would be a mistake to suppose that the non-French immigrants were uniformly of English descent, or even that they, or their direct ancestors, all came from the British Isles. An analysis of the racial elements of the pioneers of Ohio, the first part of the Northwest to be settled, will show the erroneousness of the supposition. Among the early settlers we find representatives of nearly all the races of northern Europe. There were English of both the Puritan and the Cavalier types, Irish, Scotch, Scotch-Irish, Swedes, Germans, and Dutch. All or nearly all of these had been born on American soil, but had preserved the national and religious characteristics of their ancestors, and these peculiarities endured for some years because of the isolation of the different settlements and the difficulty of intercommunication. There were distinct groups of settlements in Ohio, each with its own peculiarities.

At the southwest, between Great and Little Miami Rivers, was the Symmes Purchase. This was settled principally from New Jersey.

The Virginia Military District, situated to the east of the Symmes Purchase, had been reserved by Virginia as bounty land for its Revolutionary soldiers, and was settled

principally by Virginians. It was Virginian in sympathies and characteristics, except that there was no slavery. The people were Episcopalian in religion and in general brought in customs more like those of their English ancestors than any of the other settlers in Ohio.

The Ohio Company's district, with Marietta as the centre, was strongly permeated by New England influences. There were striking differences between these descendants of the Puritans and the children of the Cavaliers in the Virginian section; both were strongly English, but English institutions had attained their development in the one case differently from the other. In their religion, too, the differences were also marked, the Marietta people being strongly influenced by New England Congregationalism.

The part of Ohio nearest the Pennsylvania line was settled by people from that State of distinctive characteristics. Some of these settlers were Quakers, the descendants of those who had come over with Penn. Others were the descendants of Germans who had been later comers to Penn's colony, and they carried into Ohio the language and peculiarities of the Pennsylvania Dutch. The Germans. were not an important element numerically.

In the northeast of Ohio was the Western Reserve, owned and settled by Connecticut, and thoroughly like its parent State in almost every way; so that the Western Reserve was appropriately called New Connecticut.

The section which became the States of Indiana and Illinois extended north and south four hundred miles, with the northern part in the latitude of New England, and the southern reaching well into slave territory. In the north the settlers were largely from New England and New York. Often men of wealth and generally of thrift, they made good use of the natural advantages of their location and built up prosperous communities. Much of the rapid growth of Illinois and Indiana in commerce, agriculture, and manufacturing is due to the wise use which these early pioneers made of their opportunities.

Southern Illinois and Indiana had a population made up of French, Pennsylvania Dutch, a few Scotch-Irish and some Germans, but the great majority of them were native Americans from the Southern States, especially Tennessee, Kentucky, and Virginia. There were scattered families from New York and New England, but their lives were not happy, because their neighbors from the South looked upon them with contempt and did not consider them fit persons for associates. They were regarded as mean and crafty and were continually under suspicion. Many of the immigrants from the South had come north of the Ohio, partly because of the desire to try their fortunes in a new country, and partly because they were very poor and had no manual labor in Kentucky and Tennessee; they hoped to escape here the humiliation of being "poor white trash." They formed a more or less transient class. Many of these men lived by hunting and fishing, and when they found that their circumstances did not improve, or the population became too dense, they moved on.

In addition to this less desirable Southern element there were men from the South opposed to slavery, who had come to southern Illinois and Indiana because they could here find fertile lands in a congenial climate. These men made up a permanent element in the population. They were small farmers or merchants, living, like the early settlers in Kentucky, in cabins of one or two rooms, and, when not on isolated farms, gathering in little villages of from twenty to two hundred people.

There were also a few of the southern immigrants who had not been slaveholders but wished to become such. They were generally careless, desirous of having a good time, despising the thrifty Yankee settler in the north and in turn were despised by him. The differences between north and south were therefore very strongly marked, and when there was a demand for the expenditure of money for improvements in the north, there was opposition from the south for fear that it might bring in more Yankees.

« SebelumnyaLanjutkan »