 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1886 - 730 halaman
...the State agent at Detroit, asking what proofs of death would be required, and was informed by letter that the policy was not in force at the time of the death of the insured, because of the non-payment of the premium. The foregoing is the substance of... | |
 | New York (State). Court of Appeals, Joel Tiffany - 1868 - 1050 halaman
...conns?! excepted. The counsel for the DefendOpinion by GKOVER, J. ant moved for a nonsuit upon the ground that the policy was not in force at the time of the fire, for the reason that prohibited articles were, at the time, kept upon the premises. The motion... | |
 | Ontario. Court of Appeal, James Stewart Tupper, Richard Scougall Cassels - 1883 - 858 halaman
...then be reinstated on payment, coupled with a certificate of good health. i come to the conclusion that the policy was not in force at the time of the death of the assured, even if the agent could be considered as a general agent of the company without... | |
 | 1915 - 1230 halaman
...Benson, Smith & Co. In this the insurance company can have no particular interest. It is not claimed that the policy was not In force at the time of the death of Mr. Rumsey. Ordinarily it is immaterial to an Insurance company to whom the policy facts here;... | |
 | 1893 - 1176 halaman
...October 6, 1886, and his personal representatives assigned the policy to the plaintiff. The defense Is that the policy was not in force at the time of the death of the insured, by reason of bis failure to рчу the semiannual premium tliut became due December... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1886 - 968 halaman
...the State agent at Detroit, asking what proofs of death would be required, and was informed by letter that the policy was not in force at the time of the death of the insured, because of the non-payment of the premium. The foregoing is the substance of... | |
 | 1892 - 1274 halaman
...do so by an amended answer, then tendered. It was properly rejected. While there was some evidence to this effect, yet the decided weight of the testimony...that the policy was not in force at the time of the accident, iu>cau»e the first premium note was then overdue more than 15 days, and its payment had... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1922 - 722 halaman
...waived noncompliance on the part of the insured, or by its conduct has estopped itself from claiming that the policy was not in force at the time of the insured 's death. While the note recites on its face that it is accepted by the company ' ' as balance... | |
 | Missouri. Supreme Court - 1922 - 858 halaman
...of defendant does not meet with our approval, and is accordingly overruled. II. Appellant contends, that "the policy was not in force at the time of the insured 's death, because the first premium had not then been paid and Premium °f ^10 court erred... | |
 | 1892 - 1144 halaman
...do so by an amended answer, then tendered. It was properly rejected. "While there was some evidence to this effect, yet the decided weight of the testimony...first premium note was then overdue more than fifteen dnys, and its payment had been demanded; that the accident was the result of the negligence of the... | |
| |
Its defenses are that the policy was not in force at the time of the accident, because... 
