 The privilege has never been construed to mean that one who invokes it cannot subsequently be prosecuted. Its sole concern is to afford protection against being "forced to give testimony leading to the infliction of 'penalties affixed to * * * criminal...  Federal Grand Jury: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Immigration ... - Halaman 65oleh United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, and International Law - 1976 - 735 halamanTampilan utuh - Tentang buku ini
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1957 - 314 halaman
...interpreted literally, but also that its sole concern is, as its name indicates, with the danger to a witness forced to give testimony leading to the infliction of 'penalties affixed to the criminal acts ....'" Consideration of the meaning of "due process" under the Fourteenth Amendment... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1973 - 1054 halaman
...invokes it cannot subsequently be prosecuted. Its sole concern is to afford protection against being "forced to give testimony leading to the infliction of 'penalties affixed to ... criminal acts.' " 38 Immunity from the use of compelled testimony, as well as evidence derived directly and indirectly... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Select Committee on Assassinations - 1979 - 1020 halaman
...invokes it cannot subsequently be prosecuted. Its sole concern is to afford protection against being 'forced to give testimony leading to the infliction of "penalties affixed to. . .criminal cats".1 Immunity from the use of compelled testimony and evidence derived directly and indirectly therefrom... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Select Committee on Assassinations - 1979 - 1514 halaman
...invokes it cannot subsequently be prosecuted. Its sole concern is to afford protection against being ' forced to give testimony leading to the infliction of "penalties affixed to. . .criminal cats".1 Immunity from the use of compelled testimony and evidence derived directly and indirectly therefrom... | |
 | Hadley Arkes - 1992 - 296 halaman
...concern [of the provision on selfincriminationi is, as its name indicates, with the danger to a witness forced to give testimony leading to the infliction of 'penalties affixed to the criminal acts.' "4 The provision in the Fifth Amendment read in this way: "nor shall any person... | |
 | Howard W. Goldstein, Steven M. Witzel - 2021 - 840 halaman
...invokes it cannot subsequently be prosecuted. Its sole concern is to afford protection against being forced to give testimony leading to the infliction of 'penalties affixed to . . . criminal acts.' [citing Ullmann v. United States, 350 US 422, 438-439; other citations omitted.] Immunity from the... | |
 | Joseph Francis Menez, John R. Vile - 2004 - 660 halaman
...of the privilege against selfincrimination "is, as its name indicates, with the danger to a witness forced to give testimony leading to the infliction of 'penalties affixed to the criminal acts. . . .' Immunity displaces the danger. Once the reason for the privilege ceases,... | |
| |
