Termination of Treaties: The Constitutional Allocation of Power : MaterialsU.S. Government Printing Office, 1979 - 423 halaman |
Dari dalam buku
Hasil 1-5 dari 100
Halaman 26
... question of compensation to victims of inter- national air disasters . The United States will participate fully in the Montreal Conference , and hopes that it will be possible to arrive at an international consensus on this important ...
... question of compensation to victims of inter- national air disasters . The United States will participate fully in the Montreal Conference , and hopes that it will be possible to arrive at an international consensus on this important ...
Halaman 33
... question of American abrogation will arise ; there will therefore be no need to confront the constitutional question whether the President can abrogate a treaty without the approval of the Senate or the Congress . Yet even if we assume ...
... question of American abrogation will arise ; there will therefore be no need to confront the constitutional question whether the President can abrogate a treaty without the approval of the Senate or the Congress . Yet even if we assume ...
Halaman 39
... question . Moreover , the Court expressly stated that the question of the sufficiency of presidential power alone to terminate treaties was not before it . " . the question as to the authority of the Executive in the absence of ...
... question . Moreover , the Court expressly stated that the question of the sufficiency of presidential power alone to terminate treaties was not before it . " . the question as to the authority of the Executive in the absence of ...
Halaman 47
... question arose of who had the power to abrogate the treaty - the President , the Senate , the House of Representatives , or some combination of these agents ? Many different answers to this question were expressed during the debate in ...
... question arose of who had the power to abrogate the treaty - the President , the Senate , the House of Representatives , or some combination of these agents ? Many different answers to this question were expressed during the debate in ...
Halaman 49
... questions.32 The only serious question which arose concerning the abrogation of this treaty was whether the treaty could be abrogated ten years after its ratification ( on September 11 , 1854 ) or the President's proclama- tion ( March ...
... questions.32 The only serious question which arose concerning the abrogation of this treaty was whether the treaty could be abrogated ten years after its ratification ( on September 11 , 1854 ) or the President's proclama- tion ( March ...
Edisi yang lain - Lihat semua
Istilah dan frasa umum
abrogation action agree Agreement relating ALDRICH Amendment American approval Article authority BEILENSON Byrd Amendment CHAIRMAN claim COHEN commercial Committee Communist China Congress Congressional Constitution December December 15 decision declared denounce denunciation Department diplomatic relations effect entered into force established Exchange of notes executive agreements facto FISHER foreign government Foreign Relations give notice Hackworth Ibid international law issue Japan joint resolution July June jure legislative Louis Henkin March 31 ment military Mutual Defense Treaty normalization notice given notice of termination obligations party Peking Peking's People's Republic political President presidential problem provisions pursuant to notice question recognize regime Republic of China Seamen's Act Secretary Selective Service System Senator CHURCH Senator COOPER Senator Cranston Shanghai Communique Stat statement statute supra note Supreme Court Taiwan Terlinden terminate a treaty territory TIAS tion U.S. Senate unilateral United violation Warsaw Convention withdrawal
Bagian yang populer
Halaman 328 - Such measures shall be terminated when the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to restore and maintain international peace and security.
Halaman 73 - Each Party recognizes that an armed attack in the Pacific area on any of the Parties would be dangerous to its own peace and safety and declares that it would act to meet the common danger in accordance with its constitutional processes.
Halaman 178 - Britain hereby declare, that neither the one nor the other will ever obtain or maintain for itself any exclusive control over the said Ship Canal; agreeing that neither will ever erect or maintain any fortifications commanding the same, or in the vicinity thereof, or occupy, or fortify, or colonize, or assume or exercise any dominion over Nicaragua, Costa Rica, the Mosquito Coast, or any part of Central America...
Halaman 328 - This Treaty does not affect and shall not be interpreted as affecting in any way the rights and obligations under the Charter of the Parties which are members of the United Nations or the primary responsibility of the Security Council for the maintenance of international peace and security.
Halaman 321 - The Government of the United States of America acknowledges the Chinese position that there is but one China and Taiwan is part of China.
Halaman 373 - Governments, or agents thereof, which may impair the treaty rights of the United States or its citizens in China, including those which relate to the sovereignty, the independence, or the territorial and administrative integrity of the Republic of China...
Halaman 325 - The two sides expressed the hope that the gains achieved during this visit would open up new prospects for the relations between the two countries. They believe that the normalization of relations between the two countries is not only in the interest of the Chinese and American peoples but also contributes to the relaxation of tension in Asia and the world.
Halaman 178 - ... with any State or people for the purpose of erecting or maintaining any such fortifications, or of occupying, fortifying, or colonizing Nicaragua, Costa Rica, the Mosquito coast, or any part of Central America, or of assuming or exercising dominion over the same...
Halaman 251 - In short, we are of opinion that, so far as a treaty made by the United States with any foreign nation can become the subject of judicial cognizance in the courts of this country, it is subject to such acts as Congress may pass for its enforcement, modification, or repeal.
Halaman 220 - When the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person, or in the same body of magistrates, there can be no liberty ; because apprehensions may arise, lest the same monarch or senate should enact tyrannical laws, to execute them in a tyrannical manner.