W. C. St. Ry. Co. v. City of Chicago, 172 Ill. 198. Where the verdict returned by the jury in condemning a right of way is so clearly excessive as to show prejudice or passion it will be set aside. C. & A. R. R. Co. v. Scott, 225 Ill. 352. When verdict in condemnation is not excessive. I. I. & M. Ry. Co. v. Humiston, 208 Ill. 100. Judgment in. One not a party not bound by. Sanitary Dist. v. Met. "L" Ry. Co., 241 Ill. 622. When certain enough. P. B. & C. T. Co. v. Vance, 234 Ill. 36. A condemnation judgment for damages to property taken or injured takes precedence of a mortgage and of rights of a subsequent purchaser. Epling v. Dickson, 170 Ill. 329. Condemnation judgments for damages draw interest as other judgments. Epling v. Dickson, 170 Ill. 329. Statute of limitations does not apply to judgments for damages allowed in condemnation proceedings-may be enforced within twenty years. Epling v. Dickson, 170 Ill. 329. That private persons may pay part of the cost of condemnation proceedings, does not affect the judgment. C. B. & Q. R. R. Co. v. City of Naperville, 169 III. 25. One condemnation judgment, not lapsed or vacated, is a bar to subsequent proceedings against same property. New condemnation may be had if prior judgment is not in force. Pearce v. City of Chicago, 169 Ill. 631. C. R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. City of Chicago, 148 Ill. 479. Compensation in condemnation must be found by the regular jury panel. Sec. 6, Eminent Domain, refers only to proceedings in vacation. Davis v. Northwestern El. Ry. Co., 170 Ill. 595. Instructions as to. Erroneous instructions as to measure of damages in condemnation, outlined and discussed. C. B. & D. Ry. Co. v. Kelley, 221 Ill. 498. Erroneous instruction in condemnation proceedings. C. & S. L. Ry. Co. v. Kline, 220 Ill. 334. An instruction as to form of verdict in condemnation-held reversible error. C. T. T. R. R. Co. v. City of Chicago, 217 Ill. 343. Evidence and instructions in condemnation. Sexton v. U. S. Yard Co., 200 I11. 244. C. & A. R. R. Co. v. Scott, 232 Ill. 419. South Park Commissioners v. Ayer, 237 Ill. 211. H. & S. R. R. Co. v. Nolte, 243 Ill. 594. Verdict. The verdict in condemnation will stand where the jury viewed the premises, the evidence is conflicting and the damages within the range of the testimony. Pullman Co. v. City of Chicago, 224 Ill. 248. St. L. & O'F. Ry. Co. v. Union Bank, 209 Ill. 457. I. I. & M. Ry. Co. v. Humiston, 208 Ill. 100. G. & S. R. R. Co. v. Herman, 206 Ill. 34. E. & W. I. Ry. Co. v. Miller, 201 Ill. 413. Sexton v. Union S. Y. Co., 200 Ill. 244. Guyer v. D. R. I. & N. W. Ry. Co., 196 Ill. 370. C. T. T. Ry. Co. v. Bugbee, 185 Ill. 353. G. & G. E. Ry. Co. v. Milroy, 181 Ill. 243. R. I. & P. R. R. Co. v. Leisy Brwg. Co., 174 Ill. 547. W. C. St. Ry. Co. v. City of Chicago, 172 Ill. 198. Where the verdict returned by the jury in condemning a right of way is so clearly excessive as to show prejudice or passion it will be set aside. C. & A. R. R. Co. v. Scott, 225 Ill. 352. When verdict in condemnation is not excessive. I. I. & M. Ry. Co. v. Humiston, 208 Ill. 100. Judgment in. One not a party not bound by. Sanitary Dist. v. Met. "L" Ry. Co., 241 Ill. 622. When certain enough. P. B. & C. T. Co. v. Vance, 234 III. 36. A condemnation judgment for damages to property taken or injured takes precedence of a mortgage and of rights of a subsequent purchaser. Epling v. Dickson, 170 Ill. 329. Condemnation judgments for damages draw interest as other judgments. Epling v. Dickson, 170 Ill. 329. Statute of limitations does not apply to judgments for damages allowed in condemnation proceedings-may be enforced within twenty years. Epling v. Dickson, 170 Ill. 329. That private persons may pay part of the cost of condemnation proceedings, does not affect the judgment. C. B. & Q. R. R. Co. v. City of Naperville, 169 Ill. 25. One condemnation judgment, not lapsed or vacated, is a bar to subsequent proceedings against same property. New condemnation may be had if prior judgment is not in force. Pearce v. City of Chicago, 169 Ill. 631. C. R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. City of Chicago, 148 Ill. 479. Condemnation-judgment does not cure illegal proceedings. Tudor v. S. S. R. T. Ry. Co., 164 Ill. 73 (79). Condemnation of part of railroad right of way for a streetjudgment in one case bars subsequent new proceedings. I. C. R. R. Co. v. City of Champaign, 163 Ill. 524. Appeal-Pleading and Practice on. The fact that an appeal would be burdensome to an owner of a small piece of land is not sufficient cause for a separate trial, in condemnation, as to that piece. Martin v. C. & M. Elev. Ry. Co., 220 Ill. 97. Reversal of a condemnation judgment on ground that the record shows that the petitioner's road and one purchased by it are competing lines is not res adjudicata on that point. Further evidence may be heard on a new trial. Ill. State Trust Co. v. St. L. I. M. & S. Ry. Co., 217 Ill. 504. To raise a motion to dismiss condemnation proceedings, overruled below, the motion must be preserved in the Bill of Exceptions. Cella v. C. & W. I. R. R. Co., 217 Ill. 326. Condemnation judgment is not subject to review by writ of error, but by appeal only. Sweeney v. Chicago Tel. Co., 212 Ill. 475. On appeal from condemnation judgment by the property owner, the petitioner may enter the premises on giving bond. (Sec. 13, Eminent Domain.) Davis v. Northwestern El. R. R. Co., 170 Ill. 596. C. B. & Q. R. R. Co. v. Naperville, 169 Ill. 25. Condemnation appeals go directly to Supreme Court. (Eminent Domain Act, Sec. 12.) West Side "L" Co. v. Siegel, 161 Ill. 638. Plea of release of errors is necessary in condemnation case in Supreme Court, to defeat an appeal-when. West Side "L" Co. v. Siegel, 161 Ill. 638. On appeal by railroad company from condemnation judgment awarding damages to it, a decree dissolving an injunction to restrain construction of the road will be affirmed, where the award is affirmed. Johnson v. Met. W. S. "L" Co., 160 Ill. 477. Procedure on reversal of a judgment of condemnation without remanding-withdrawal of deposit made pending decision on appeal. Ligare v. C. M. & N. Ry. Co., 160 Ill. 530. Affirmance of judgment of condemnation on appeal is affirmance of order of possession. C. & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Town of Cicero, 157 Ill. 89. |