routing storage volume FREMONT, ELKHORN AND MISSOURI VALLEY R. Co., RE... FULTON V. CHICAGO, ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS AND OMAHA R. Co. GALLATIN, TENN.. GAUGING OF COUPLERS, LACK OF SYSTEM IN GEDDES, RECEIVER, UNITED STATES V- 82 GERKE BREWING CO. v. LOUISVILE AND NASHVILLE R. Co 83, 84 145, 166 77 210 GIBSON, IND. T. GIRARD, PA.. 40 39, 46 GLOVERSVILLE, N. Y 40 GOODWYN, D. M.. 83 GRAIN SHIPPERS' ASSOCIATION OF NORTHWEST IOWA v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL R. Co. Detroit Board of Trade v... McMorran v re investigation of acts and doings GRANVILLE, OHIO GREATER CARE IN RETURN OF FOREIGN 39, 43, 44, 49, 65-69 252 158 169 165 38, 43 104 CARS 93 HADDOCK V. DELAWARE, LACKAWANNA AND WESTERN R. Co.... 45 HAMILTON & BROWN v. CHATTANOOGA, ROME AND COLUMBUS R. Co.. HAMPTON BOARD OF TRADE v. NASHVILLE, CHATTANOOGA AND ST. LOUIS R. Co. 192 74 262 HECK & PETREE v. EAST TENNESSEE, VIRGINIA AND GEORGIA R. Co HEZEL MILLING Co. v. ST. LOUIS, ALTON AND TERRE HAUTE R. Co. HILLSDALE, MICH... HILLSIDE COAL AND IRON CO HOCKING VALLEY R. Co... HOGANSVILLE, GA HOGS AND HOG PRODUCTS HOLBROOK V. ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS AND MANITOBA R. Co HOLDZKOM V. MICHIGAN CENTRAL R. Co HOLMES & Co. v. SOUTHERN R. Co. HORSES Page. 69, 81 40 79 83 39, 41 184 200 143 272 272 38, 41, 59 81 145, 166 147 40 197 222 267 64 75 89 70, 71, 73 289 139 268 263, 264 42 157 83 154 HOWELL v. NEW YORK, LAKE ERIE AND WESTERN R. Co HURLBURT V. LAKE SHORE AND MICHIGAN SOUTHERN R. Co.. HUTCHINSON AND ARKANSAS RIVER R. Co.. IMPERFECT KNOWLEDGE OF SAFETY APPLIANCES IMPERIAL COAL Co. v. PITTSBURG AND LAKE ERIE R. Co.. 39, 44, 65, 83, 86 246 276 252 241 163 174 81 INCOME ACCOUNT, COMPARATIVE, OF RAILWAYS OF THE UNITED STATES 114 INCOME AND EXPENDITURES FOR THE YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1903 INDEX TO POINTS DECIDED BY THE COMMISSION SINCE ITS ORGANIZATION Page. 27, 29, 39, 41, 109 INDIANA, DECATUR AND WESTERN R. Co., SUFFERN, HUNT & Co. v. 238 INDIAN TERRITORY 20, 28, 29, 40, 44, 109 INEXPERIENCE OF EMPLOYEES AS A FACTOR 97 INFORMAL COMPLAINTS FILED WITH THE COMMISSION DURING THE YEAR.. 42, 311-322 86 62, 276 279 IN THE MATTER OF RATES AND PRACTICES OF THE MOBILE AND OHIO R. Co. JACKSON V. ST. LOUIS, ARKANSAS AND TEXAS R. Co.. JAMES & ABBOTT v. Canadian Pacific R. Co.. v. East Tennesse, Virginia and Georgia R. Co. JAMES & MAYER BUGGY CO. v. CINCINNATI, NEW ORLEANS AND TEXAS PACIFIC 83 141 210 170 R. Co JANESVILLE, WIS JEANNETTE, PA JELLICO, KY 195 63 38, 43 45 JEROME HILL COTTON Co. v. MISSOURI, KANSAS AND TEXAS R. Co. v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC R. Co JOHNSTON-LARIMER DRY GOODS Co. v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE R. Co JOHNSTOWN, OHIO JOHNSTOWN, PA JOINT TARIFFS AND SCHEDULES, RE JUMPING ON OR OFF TRAINS, CASUALTIES RESULTING FROM. 229 272 83, 85 229 38, 43 38, 43 143 164 101 284, 290 89 68, 69 18, 22, 27, 29, 40, 41, 43, 44, 45, 86 49 18, 20, 38, 42, 45, 50, 51, 52 79 KANSAS RAILROAD COMMISSION v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE R. Co.. KENTUCKY AND INDIANA BRIDGE Co. v. LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE R. Co... KENTUCKY RAILROAD COMMISSION v. CINCINNATI, NEW ORLEANS AND TEXAS 155 141 PACIFIC R. Co.... KEYSTONE JUNCTION, PA KINDEL V. ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE R. Co... KING & Co. v. NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN AND HARTFORD R. Co KINGWOOD COAL Co. v. WEST VIRGINIA NORTHERN R. Co KNOXVILLE, TENN LACK OF SYSTEM IN GAUGING COUPLERS 241 39, 43 56, 265, 281 186 78 38, 44 94 LA CROSSE MANUFACTURERS AND JOBBERS' UNION v. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE LA GRANGE, GA... LA GRANGE LONG AND SHORT HAUL CASE LAKE ERIE AND WESTERN R. Co., SOUTHERN PAINT AND Glass Co. v. 149 38, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74 70 220 LAKE SHORE AND MICHIGAN SOUTHERN R. Co.-Continued. Page. 216 253 201 64, 278 81, 82 140 38 46 290 41, 46 75 75, 86 191 230 178 197 63, 64 170 141 63 8, 9, 14 290 121 121 121 121 121 290 290 290 155 156 156, 169 200 51 163 249 165 40 14, 38, 42, 43, 290 290 38, 117, 290 290 110 163 38, 40, 41, 42, 49–57, 70-74, 288, 291, 294 42 79 208 LISTMAN MILL Co. v. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE AND ST. PAUL R. Co..... |