ALABAMA GREAT SOUTHERN R. Co., RE ALABAMA MIDLAND R. Co., TROY BOARD OF TRADE v.. 295 287 291 297 296 288 288 70, 288, 295 295 17 297 297 297 122 42, 83 12 95 12, 13-17, 38, 40, 43, 46, 49 13 14 ALLEGED EXCESSIVE FREIGHT RATES AND CHARGES ON FRUIT PRODUCTS.. 179 ALBANY, GA ALFORD V. CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC R. Co... ALLEGED UNLAWFUL CHARGES ON VEGETABLES FROM FLORIDA POINTS BY THE 207 264 251 237 ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF THE ACT BY THE ST. LOUIS AND SAN FRANCISCO R. 256 ALLEGHENY VALLEY R. Co., WOLF BROS. v.. 232 ALLEN v. LOUISVILLE, NEW ALBANY AND CHICAGO R. Co AMERICAN WAREHOUSEMEN'S ASSOCIATION v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL R. Co.. 246 41 AMES, CHAMPION V.. 79 ANALYSIS OF TAXES ON RAILWAYS SHOWING BASIS OF PAYMENTS. 27 ANDREWS SOAP Co. v. PITTSBURG, CINCINNATI AND ST. LOUIS R. Co APPLICATION OF CERTAIN CARRIERS FOR FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN 259 APPORTIONMENT OF RAILROAD CARS TO COMPETING COAL MINES. 78 123 ASSOCIATED WHOLESALE GROCERS OF ST. LOUIS v. MISSOURI PACIFIC R. Co... 141 122 ASSOCIATION OF RAILWAY COMMISSIONERS. 121 ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE R. Co.. 19, 20, 22, 39, 44, 49, 51, 52, 57, 62, 65, 68, 69, 87 275 AUSTIN AND NORTHWESTERN R. Co., DALLAS FREIGHT BUREAU v.. AUTOMATIC COUPLERS, EQUIPMENT FITTED WITH.. AVOCA, MICH.. 65, 69, 85 32-34 38, 43, 46 269 110 40 Page. BAYOU LAFOURCHE 41 BEAVER & Co. v. PITTSBURG, CINCINNATI AND ST. LOUIS R. Co 295 54 BEHLMER V. MEMPHIS AND CHARLESTON R. Co 218 BEHREND V. WASHINGTON SOUTHERN R. Co..... 63, 282 BELL Co. v. BALTIMORE AND OHIO SOUTHWESTERN R. Co. 62, 282 BOARD OF TRADE OF CHATTANOOGA v. EAST TENNESSEE, VIRGINIA AND BOARDS OF TRADE UNION OF FARMINGTON, ETC., v. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE AND ST. PAUL R. Co.... BOOKS, PAPERS, AND DOCUMENTS. BOSTON AND ALBANY R. Co. 209 142 75-77, 283, 287 250 141 88 275 63, 282 United States ex rel. v. 82 BOSTON, MASS. BOYER & Co. v. CHESAPEAKE, OHIO AND SOUTHWESTERN R. Co. BOSTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE V. LAKE SHORE AND MICHIGAN SOUTHERN R. Co. BOWES, F. B. BRADY V. PENNSYLVANIA R. Co.... 145 192, 195 38, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 63 83 232 154 BREWER & HANLEITER V. LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE R. Co.. BUCKEYE BUGGY Co. v. CLEVELAND, CINCINNATI, CHICAGO AND ST. LOUIS R. Co. 61, 282 BURTON STOCK CAR Co. v. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY R. Co. BUSINESS MEN'S LEAGUE OF ST. LOUIS v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE R. CAPE GIRARDEAU AND SOUTHWESTERN R. Co., MISSOURI AND ILLINOIS RAIL- Page. CAPEHART V. LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE R. Co.. 138 CAPITAL STOCK OF RAILWAYS CAPPS, C. R...... CARELESSNESS IN KEEPING REPAIR RECORDS 95 CARLOAD RATES. 38, 39, 40, 61, 62, 284 CARLOAD RATES, APPLICATION OF, TO COMBINED SHIPMENTS. 61, 62 CARLOAD RATES, MIXED. 284 CAR MILEAGE. 284 CARRIAGE, COST OF. 286 CARRIAGE, INSTRUMENTALITIES OF. 289 CARRIAGE OF PERSONS FREE OR AT REDUCED RATES BY THE BOSTON AND MAINE CARY v. EUREKA SPRINGS R. Co... CASES DECIDED BY THE COMMISSION DURING THE YEAR CASES INVOLVING ENFORCEMENT OF ORDERS OF THE COMMISSION CATTLE RAISERS' ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS v. FORT WORTH AND DENVER CITY R. Co.... CAUSES OF INCREASE OF PERCENTAGES OF ACCIDENTS. CENTRAL OF GEORGIA R. Co., DAWSON BOARD OF TRADE V. CHARLESTON AND SAVANNAH R. Co., SAVANNAH BUREAU OF FREIGHT AND TRANSPORTATION V... 240 46-65 69-75 80, 292 44 258 101 101 102 101 215 245, 246 96 252 155 264 75 79 116 120 117 243, 247 CHARLTON, MD.. CHATTANOOGA, ROME AND COLUMBUS R. Co., HAMILTON & BROWN v CHATTANOOGA, TENN.. Page. 38, 40, 44, 45 42, 43 45 192 40, 41, 44, 45, 53, 54, 55, 77 CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO R. Co... United States v. CHESAPEAKE, OHIO AND SOUTHWESTERN R. Co., BOYER & Co. v... CHICAGO AND ALTON R. Co. Chicago Board of Trade v. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific R. Co. v... re United States v. v. Pennsylvania R. Co CHICAGO AND EASTERN ILLINOIS R. Co., RE CHICAGO AND GRAND TRUNK R. Co. Larrison v Michigan Congress Water Co. v Potter Manufacturing Co. v.. CHICAGO AND NORTHWESTERN R. Co.... 41, 43, 68, 69, 82 82 232 39, 44, 66 182 172 170 242 82 139 239 140 163 238 39, 44, 65, 81 CHICAGO BOARD OF TRADE . CHICAGO AND ALTON R. Co.. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY R. Co.. 198 159 81 CHICAGO FIREPROOF COVERING Co. v. CHICAGO AND NORTHWESTERN R. Co.. CINCINNATI FREIGHT BUREAU v. CINCINNATI, NEW ORLEANS AND TEXAS Fulton v... Johnson v.. PACIFIC R. Co Procter & Gamble Co. v... re.. CINCINNATI, HAMILTON AND DAYTON R. Co CINCINNATI, INDIANAPOLIS AND WESTERN R. Co 82 257 39, 44, 66, 82, 86 15, 22, 23, 24, 25, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 48, 49, 116 39, 44, 65, 82, 86 142 204 149 249 244 230 143 82 19, 20, 39, 44, 51, 65, 86 173 225 220 213 51, 280 |