ACT TO REGULATE COMMERCE—Continued.

Page.
section 3.

38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 50, 51, 52, 53-56, 32, 70–74, 293, 296
section 4.

38, 40, 41, 42, 49–57, 70–74, 288, 291, 294
section 5.

40, 41, 70, 76, 83, 84, 288, 292
section 6.

11, 38, 39, 40, 42, 65–69, 83, 295
section 7.

295
section 8.

287
section 9.

291
section 12.

297
section 13.

296
section 14.

288
section 15.

288
section 16.

70, 288, 295
section 17.

295
section 20.

17
section 21.

297
section 22.

297
transportation, subject to

297
uniform classification.

122
violations.

42, 83
weak and inadequate..

12
ACTUAL CONDITIONS OF SAFETY APPLIANCES.

95
ADVANCES IN FREIGHT RATES

12, 13–17, 38, 40, 43, 46, 49
accomplished in various ways

13
bulk of interstate traffic.

14
changes in classification.

14
originated with financial heads.

15
reasonableness

16
result of concerted action

15
tremendous in the aggregate

14
AGREEMENTS

283
AIR-BRAKE SITUATION

91
ALABAMA

27, 29, 41, 44
ALABAMA GREAT SOUTHERN R. Co., RE

241
ALABAMA MIDLAND R. Co., TROY BOARD OF TRADE V.

212
ALBANY, GA

41
ALFORD v. CHICAGO, Rock ISLAND AND Pacific R. Co....

173
ALLEGED DISTURBANCE IN PASSENGER RATES BY THE CANADIAN PACIFIC R.
Co., RE

249
ALLEGED EXCESSIVE FREIGHT RATES AND CHARGES ON FRUIT PRODUCTS..

179
ALLEGED UNLAWFUL CHARGES FOR THE TRANSPORTATION OF COAL BY THE
LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE R. Co., RE

207
ALLEGED UNLAWFUL CHARGES ON VEGETABLES FROM FLORIDA POINTS BY THE
SAVANNAH, FLORIDA AND WESTERN R. Co., RE

264
ALLEGED UNLAWFUL RATES AND PRACTICES IN THE TRANSPORTATION OF COT-

TON BY THE KANSAS CITY, MEMPHIS AND BIRMINGHAM R. Co., RE... 251
ALLEGED UNLAWFUL RATES AND PRACTICES IN THE TRANSPORTATION OF GRAIN

AND GRAIN PRODUCTS BY THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE R.
Co., RE

237
ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF THE ACT BY THE ST. LOUIS AND SAN FRANCISCO R.
Co., RE.

256
ALLEGHENY VALLEY R. Co., WOLF Bros. v..

232
ALLEN v. LOUISVILLE, NEW ALBANY AND CHICAGO R. Co

142
ALEXANDRIA, OHIO

38,43
ALLOWANCES TO ELEVATORS

40
AMENDMENTS TO THE LAW, RECOMMENDATIONS.

12
AMERICAN RAILWAY MASTER MECHANICS' ASSOCIATION

87
AMERICAN REFRIGERATOR TRANSIT Co..

25
AMERICAN WAREHOUSEMEN'S ASSOCIATION v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL R. Co..

246
AMERICUS, Ga....

41
AMES, CHAMPION V...

79
ANALYSIS OF TAXES ON RAILWAYS SHOWING BASIS OF PAYMENTS.

27
ANDREWS SOAP Co. v. PITTSBURG, CINCINNATI AND St. Louis R. Co

178
ANNAPOLIS, WASHINGTON AND BALTIMORE R. Co., RE

138
ANTHONY SALT Co. v. MISSOURI Pacific R. Co....

203
ANTITRUIT LAW...

76,283
APPARATUS, UNCOUPLING.

93

RE..

28, 29

Page.
APPENDIX A.

123
B.

135
C.

299
D.

323
E.

347
F.

349
G..

351
APPLES

40
APPLICATION OF CARLOAD RATES TO COMBINED SHIPMENTS..

61
APPLICATION OF CERTAIN CARRIERS FOR FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN
WHICH TO COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE SAFETY-APPLIANCE ACT,

259
APPORTIONMENT OF RAILROAD CARS TO COMPETING COAL MINES.

78
APPROPRIATIONS AND EXPENDITURES OF THE COMMISSION

123
ARIZONA
ARKADELPHIA, ARK.

41
ARKANSAS

20, 27, 29, 43, 51, 109
ASSOCIATED WHOLESALE GROCERS OF St. Louis v. MISSOURI PACIFIC R. Čo... 141
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILWAY ACCOUNTING OFFICERS..

122
ASSOCIATION OF RAILWAY COMMISSIONERS.

121
ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE R.Co., 19, 20, 22, 39, 44, 49, 51, 52, 57, 62, 65, 68, 69, 87
Business Men's League v.

275
Duncan v..

214
Freeman r

236
Gustin v...

255
Johnston-Larimer Dry Goods Co. v.

229
Kansas Railroad Commission v

256
Kindel v.

56, 265, 281
Mayor and City Council of Wichita v.

49, 51, 52, 278, 279, 280
re.

231, 233, 247
Rice v

184
San Bernardino Board of Trade v..

180
Shippers' Union of Phoenix v.

273
United States v.

82
ATLANTA AND WEST POINT R. Co

71, 83
re tariffs and classifications of

165
ATLANTA, GA

42, 70, 71, 73, 84
ATLANTIC COAL AND COKE Co
ATLANTIC COAST LINE R. Co..

81
ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES.

65, 69, 85
ATTORNEYS, SPECIAL, BEFORE COMMISSION

32-34
AURORA, MO

38, 43, 46
AUSTIN AND NORTH WESTERN R. Co., Dallas FREIGHT BUREAU v..

269
AUTOMATIC COUPLERS, EQUIPMENT FITTED WITH..

110
Avoca, Mich..

40
BADDELEY, J. C.

19
BAER, GEORGE F..

75
BAINBRIDGE, Ohio..

39, 43, 46
BAIRD, David G...

75
BALTIMORE AND OHIO R. Co

89
Castle v.

258
Montell v

242
New York Produce Exchange v.

247
Pittsburg, Cincinnati and St. Louis R. Co. v..

172
Riddle, Dean & Co. v...

142, 149
Sprigg v..

261
BALTIMORE AND Ohio SOUTHWESTERN R. Co.
Bell Co. V..

62, 282
Rice v

211
BALTIMORE, MD

38, 39, 41, 43, 44
BALTIMORE, Ohio..

78, 79

Page.
BAYOU LAFOURCHE

41
BEAVER & Co. v. PITTSBURG, CINCINNATI AND St. Louis R. Co

295
BEHLMER, LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE R. Co. v.

54
BEHLMER v. MEMPHIS AND CHARLESTON R. Co

218
BEHREND V. WASHINGTON SOUTHERN R. Co...

63, 282
BELL Co, v. BALTIMORE AND Ohio SOUTHWESTERN R. Co..

62, 282
BENNETTSVILLE, S. C...

42
BENTON HARBOR, MICH

45
BILLS OF LADING

283
BIRMINGHAM, ALA..

122
BISHOP v. DUVAL

166
BLANCHESTER, Ohio.

46
BLOCK SYSTEM...

102-107
BOARD OF TRADE OF CHATTANOOGA V. East TENNESSEE, VIRGINIA AND
GEORGIA R. Co.

209
BOARDS OF TRADE UNION OF FARMINGTON, ETC., v. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE
AND ST. PAUL R. Co...

142
BOOKS, PAPERS, AND DOCUMENTS.

75–77, 283, 287
BOSTON AND ALBANY R. Co.
Kemble v..

250
v. Boston and Lowell R. Co..

141
BOSTON AND MAINE R. Co.....

88
Diamond Mills v...

275
Macloon v

63, 282
United States ex rel. v..

82
BOSTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE V. LAKE SHORE AND MICHIGAN SOUTHERN R. Co. 145
BOSTON FRUIT AND PRODUCE EXCHANGE V. NEW YORK AND NEW ENGLAND
R. Co..

192, 195
BOSTON, Mass.

38, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 63
BOWES, F. B.

83
BOYER & Co. v. CHESAPEAKE, OHIO AND SOUTHWESTERN R. Co..

232
BRADY v. PENNSYLVANIA R. Co...

154
BREWER & HANLEITER v. LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE R. Co..

80, 238
BRIDGE CHARGES.

283
BRIDGEPORT, CONN...

45
BRIMSON, INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION V

33
BROCKWAY v. ULSTER AND DELAWARE R. Co.

249
BROKERAGE, TICKET..

297
BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD TRAINMEN
BROWNELL v. COLUMBUS AND CINCINNATI MIDLAND R. Co

211
BROWN, WILLIAM G

75
BUCHANAN V. NORTHERN PACIFIC R. Co......

196
BUCKEYE BUGGY Co. v. CLEVELAND, CINCINNATI, CHICAGO AND St. Louis R. Co. 61, 282
BUFFALO, N. Y...

45
BULLETINS, QUARTERLY ACCIDENT

96, 103
BULLITT, WILLIAM C..

68
BURDEN OF PROOF.

283
BURLINGTON AND MISSOURI RIVER R. Co.
Griffee v.

158
Gustin v

164
Lincoln Board of Trade v

155
BURNSIDE, TENN..

53, 54, 55
BURTON STOCK CAR Co. v. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY R. Co.

140
BUSINESS MEN'S ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA
v. Chicago and Northwestern R. Co....

152
v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis and Omaha R. Co

151
BUSINESS MEN'S LEAGUE OF St. Louis v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE R.
Co

275
CAIRO, ILL

41
CALIFORNIA

27, 29, 43, 69, 70, 109
CALIFORNIA ORANGE CASE..

81
CALLOWAY v. LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE R. Co

243
CAMDEN, ARK

52
CANADIAN COMPETITION

283
CANADIAN PACIFIC R. Co., JAMES & ABBOTT V.

210
CANNON FALLS, MINN.

41

87

!

64,78

Page.
CAPE GIRARDEAU AND SOUTHWESTERN R. Co., MISSOURI AND ILLINOIS RAIL-
ROAD TIE AND LUMBER Co. v..

138
CAPEHART v. LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE R. Co..

187
CAPITALIZATION OF RAILWAY PROPERTY.,

16, 111, 112
CAPITAL STOCK OF RAILWAYS

111, 283
CAPPs, C. R.......

83
CARELESSNESS IN KEEPING REPAIR RECORDS

95
CARLOAD RATES.

38, 39, 40, 61, 62, 284
CARLOAD RATES, APPLICATION OF, TO COMBINED SHIPMENTS.

61, 62
CARLOAD RATES, MIXED.

284
CAR MILEAGE.

284
CARRIAGE, COST OF...

286
CARRIAGE, INSTRUMENTALITIES OF.

289
CARRIAGE OF PERSONS FREE OR AT REDUCED RATES BY THE BOSTON AND MAINE
R. Co., RE...

198
CARRIERS
accident reports

96–107, 323
advances in rates.

12, 13–17, 38, 40, 43, 46, 49
competition

10, 11, 16, 23
concerted action to advance rates.

15
financial reports...

17
injunctions against

65-69
liable under the Elkins law

8
lien

290
observance of tariffs

10, 11
safety appliances

84–96, 295
subject to act....

284
valuation

26–32
CARR V. NORTHERN PACIFIC R. Co..

166
CARS

22–26, 38, 41, 78, 110, 284, 289, 291
apportionment of.

78
discrimination in furnishing
immigrant..

289
inspection

289
mileage....

291
private

22-26
refrigerator

22, 23, 294
safety appliances on

84–96, 295
stock..

22, 24
supplying..

38,41
CARY v. EUREKA SPRINGS R. Co....

240
CASES DECIDED BY THE COMMISSION DURING THE YEAR

46-65
CASES INVOLVING ENFORCEMENT OF ORDERS OF THE COMMISSION

69–75
CASES PENDING IN THE COURTS

80, 292
CASES SETTLED AND DISCONTINUED.

44
CASTLE v. BALTIMORE AND OHIO R. Co.

258
CASUALTIES TO RAILWAY EMPLOYEES.

96–107
coupling and uncoupling cars.

101
falling from train and engines..

101
resulting from collisions and derailments..

102
resulting from jumping on or off trains..

101
CATOR v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC Co...

215
CATTLE RAISERS' ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS v. FORT WORTH AND DENVER CITY
R. Co....

245, 246
CAUSES OF INCREASE OF PERCENTAGES OF ACCIDENTS.
CENTRAL OF GEORGIA R. Co., Dawson BOARD OF TRADE V.

252
CENTRAL R. OF NEW JERSEY
New Jersey Fruit Exchange v..

155
Warren-Ehret Co. v.

264
CHAMBERS, FRED. F.

75
CHAMPION V. AMES..

79
CHANGES IN COMPETITIVE RATES

116
CHANGES IN LAWS OF TAXATION

120
CHANGES IN LOCAL RATES

117
CHARLESTON AND Savannah R. Co., SAVANNAH BUREAU OF FREIGHT AND
TRANSPORTATION V..

243, 247

96

re

81

Page.
CHARLESTON, S. C

38, 40, 44, 45
CHARLOTTE, N. C

42, 43
CHARLTON, MD

45
CHATTANOOGA, ROME AND COLUMBUS R. Co., HAMILTON & BROWN v..

192
CHATTANOOGA, TENN..

40, 41, 44, 45, 53, 54, 55, 77
CHESAPEAKE AND Ohio R. Co..

41, 43, 68, 69, 82
United States v.

82
CHESAPEAKE, OHIO AND SOUTHWESTERN R. Co., BOYER & Co. v..

232
CHICAGO AND ALTON R. Co..

39, 44, 66
Chicago Board of Trade v.

182
Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific R. Co. v.

172
Leonard v..

170

242
United States v..

82
v. Pennsylvania R. Co

139
CHICAGO AND EASTERN ILLINOIS R. Co., RE

239
CHICAGO AND GRAND TRUNK R. Co.
Larrison v

140
Michigan Congress Water Co. v

163
Potter Manufacturing Co. v.

238
CHICAGO AND NORTHWESTERN R. Co....

39, 44, 65, 81
Business Men's Association of Minnesota v..

152
Chicago Fireproof Covering Co. v..

257
Commercial Club of Omaha v..

241
Logan v....

163
Macloon v.

198
Rend v

159
United States v.
CHICAGO BOARD OF TRADE v. CHICAGO AND ALTON R. Co..

182
CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY R. Co....

39, 44, 65, 82
Burton Stock Car Co. V...

140
Cattle Raisers' Association of Texas v..

245, 246
Martin v..

150
United States v.

82
CHICAGO FIREPROOF COVERING Co. v. CHICAGO AND NORTHWESTERN R. Co.. 257
CHICAGO GREAT WESTERN R. Co.....

39, 44, 66, 82, 86
United States v.,

82
CHICAGO, ILL....

15, 22, 23, 24, 25, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 48, 49, 116
CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE AND St. Paul R. Co..

39, 44, 65, 82, 86
Boards of Trade Union of Farmington, etc., v..

142
Eau Claire Board of Trade v.

204
La Crosse Manufacturers and Jobbers' Union v

149
Listman Mill Co. v....

249
Milwaukee Chamber of Commerce v

244
Mount Vernon Milling Co. v

230
Raymond v

143
United States v..

82
CHICAGO, Rock ISLAND AND Pacific R. Co.

19, 20, 39, 44, 51, 65, 86
Alford v

173
Daniels v

225
Emerson v..

220
F. Schumacher Milling Co. v.,

213
Mayor and City Council of Wichita v..

51, 280
Omaha Commercial Club v..

231
United States v..

82, 84
v. Chicago and Alton R. Co..

172
CHICAGO, ST. PAUL AND KANSAS City R. CO. RE

156
CHICAGO, St. Paul, MINNEAPOLIS AND OMAHA R. Co.
Business Men's Association of Minnesota v

151
Fulton v...

139
Johnson v...

272
CHRISTIANSBURG, VA..

41
CINCINNATI FREIGHT BUREAU V. CINCINNATI, NEW ORLEANS AND TEXAS
Pacific R. Co

218, 235
CINCINNATI, HAMILTON AND DAYTON R. Co

89
Procter & Gamble Co. v...

57–61, 180, 190, 277

219
CINCINNATI, INDIANAPOLIS AND WESTERN R. Co.

89

re..