A. FORMAL PROCEEDINGS INSTITUTED BEFORE THE COMMIS SION DURING THE YEAR. 646. In the Matter of Proposed Advance in Freight Rates. December 1, 1902. Order entered. April 1, 1903. Report and opinion filed. 647. In the Matter of Import Rates. December 11, 1902. Order entered. January 20, 1903. Hearing. Complaint alleges violation of sections 1, 2, 3, and 6 in transportation of coal from Jellico mines in Kentucky to Knoxville, Tenn. March 7, 1903. Order of dismissal entered. Complaint alleges violation of sections 1, 3, and 4 in transportation of live stock from Kearney, Mo., to Chicago, Ill. March 26, 1903. Order of dismissal entered. 650. Wilmington Chamber of Commerce against Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Com pany. Complaint alleges violation of sections 1 and 3 in transportation of cotton seed from Clio, S. C., to Laurinburg, N. C. January 2, 1903. Complaint filed. February 2, 1903. Statement in lieu of answer filed. 651. Samuel K. Behrend against Washington Southern Railway Company and others. ington, D. C., to Moseley, Va. December 2, 1903. Report and opinion filed. 652. S. S. Daish and Sons against Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Rail way Company. hay from Columbus, Ohio, to Washington, Þ. C. 653. Aurora Milling Company against St. Louis and San Francisco Railroad Company. Complaint alleges violation of sections 4 and 6 in transportation of flour from Aurora, Mo., to Marked Tree, Ark. June 15, 1903. Order of dismissal entered. Complaint alleges violation of sections 1, 3, and 4 in transportation of freight from Boston, New York, Philadelphia, and Baltimore to La Grange, Ga. Commission. 655. Duluth Shingle Company against Duluth, South Shore and Atlantic Railway Company and others. from Duluth, Minn., to Chicago, Ill. June 19 to 22, 1903. Briefs and arguments filed. 656. Dewey Brothers against Toledo and Ohio Central Railway Company and others. Complaint alleges violation of sections 1, 3, and 4 in transportation of carload shipments of hay from Johnstown, Alexandria, and other points in Ohio, to Wilmington, N. C. May 11, 1903. Order of dismissal entered. Complaint alleges violation of sections 1, 3, and 4 in the transportation of þananas from Charleston, S. C., to Greensboro, N. C. February 25, 1903. Complaint filed. March 23, 1903. Order of dismissal entered. 658. Charles A. Thompson against Pennsylvania Railroad Company. Complaint alleges violation of sections 2 and 3 in supplying cars for shipment of coal from Quincy, Johnstown, Jeannette, and Marchand, Pa., to various markets. June 23 to July 16, 1903. Briefs filed. 659. Buckeye Buggy Company against Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company and others. buggies from Columbus, Ohio, to Pittsburg, Pa., Louisville, Ky., and Atlanta, Ga. December 2, 1903. Report and opinion filed. Complaint alleges violation of sections 2 and 6 in failure to supply cars at Bainbridge, Ohio, for shipment of cross-ties and failure to publish and post schedules of rates and fares. June 13 to October 9, 1903. Briefs filed. Complaint alleges violation of sections 1, 2, and 3, in the transportation of cross-ties from Bainbridge, Ohio, to Girard, Pa. 662. C. S. Bell Company against Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad Company and others. quantity of freignt requisite to secure a carload rate. December 2, 1903. Report and opinion filed. 663. John H. Parks against Cincinnati & Muskingum Valley Railroad Company. Complaint alleges violation of sections 2 and 3, in supply cars at New Holland, Ohio, for shipment of grain. filed. November 27, 1903. Hearing of oral argument. 664. In the Matter of the Transportation of Salt from Points in Michigan to Missouri River Points and Intermediate Localities. June 18 to August 26, 1903. Briefs filed. Complaint alleges violation of sections 1 and 3, in failure to supply cars for shipment of coal from Meyersdale and Keystone Junction, Pa., and unrea sonable charge where coal is loaded from wagons. November 23, 1903. Brief filed. 666. W. J. Koch and Company against Pennsylvania Railroad Company and others. Complaint alleges violation of sections 1, 2, and 3 in milling in transit privilege at Harrisburg, Pa. October 3, 1903. Order of dismissal entered. 667. City Gas Company of Norfolk against Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company. Complaint alleges violation of sections 1, 2, and 3 in the transportation of coal from the mines to Baltimore when it is reshipped by boat to Norfolk. October 20, 1903. Hearing. 668. In the Matter of Rates on Grain and Grain Products over the Chicago, Mil waukee and St. Paul Railway. November 30, 1903. Case assigned for hearing January 7, 1904, at Chicago, Ill. 669. In the Matter of Rates on Grain and Grain Products over the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway. November 30, 1903. Case assigned for hearing January 7, 1904, at Chicago, Ill. 670. In the Matter of Rates on Grain and Grain Products over the Chicago and Northwestern Railway. 671. In the Matter of Rates on Grain and Grain Products over the Chicago Great Western Railway. November 30, 1903. Case assigned for hearing January 7, 1904, at Chicago, Ill. 672. In the Matter of Rates on Grain and Grain Products over Lines Operated by the Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railway Company. November 30, 1903. Čase assigned for hearing January 7, 1904, at Chicago, Ill. 673. In the Matter of Rates on Grain and Grain Products over the Illinois Central Railroad. November 30, 1903. Case assigned for hearing January 7, 1904, at Chicago, Ill. 674. In the Matter of Rates on Grain and Grain Products over the Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railway. November 30, 1903. Case assigned for hearing January 7, 1904, at Chicago, Ill. 675. In the Matter of Rates on Grain and Grain Products over the Wabash Railroad. April 8, 1903. Order entered. November 30, 1903. Case assigned for hearing January 7, 1904, at Chicago, Ill. 676. In the Matter of Rates on Grain and Grain Products over the Chicago and Alton Railway. Ill. 677 In the Matter of Class and Commodity Rates from St. Louis to Texas Common Points in Force over the Missouri, Kansas and Texas Railway. November 11 to 14, 1903. Hearing. 678. In the Matter of Class and Commodity Rates from St. Louis to Texas Common Points in Force over the St. Louis Southwestern Railway. November 11 to 14, 1903. Hearing. 679. In the Matter of Class and Commodity Rates from St. Louis to Texas Common Points in Force over the St. Louis and San Francisco Railroad. November 11 to 14, 1903. Hearing. 680. In the Matter of Class and Commodity Rates from St. Louis to Texas Common Points in Force over the Missouri Pacific and other railways. 681. Central Yellow Pine Association against Vicksburg, Shreveport and Pacific Rail road Company and others. of so-called tap-line division of rates. at the hearing. August 10 to November 3, 1903. Briefs filed. 682. Independent Coal Company against Lehigh Valley Railroad Company and others. Complaint alleges violation of sections 1, 2, and 3 in rates on anthracite coal from points in Pennsylvania to Gloversville, N. Y. April 21, 1903. Complaint filed. May 11 to 13, 1903. Answers filed. 683. William Wrigley, jr., and Company against Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company and others. from Chicago to points south of the Ohio and Potomac rivers and east of the Mississippi River. request of the complainant. Complaint alleges violation of section 3 in supplying cars at Valley Center, Doyle, Avoca, Croswell, and Memphis, Michigan, for shipments of hay and grain. Mich. December 14, 1903. Complainant's bill of particulars filed. 685. Silk Association of America against PhiladeĪphia and Reading Railway Com pany and others. pared with the manufactured article. be hereafter fixed. 686. Merchants' Freight Bureau, Little Rock, Ark., against St. Louis, Iron Moun tain and Southern Railway and others. St. Louis and Birds Point, Mo., East St. Louis and Cairo, Ill., Memphis, cotton presses, cotton gins, and cotton-gin machinery from Little Rock to cotton presses, cotton gins, and cotton-gin machinery. 687. In the Matter of the Allowances to Elevators by the Union Pacific Railroad Company. December 15, 1903. Hearing of oral argument. 688. J. F. Stout against Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company and others. Complaint alleges violation of sections 1, 2, and 3 in rates on dried fruit from Hemet, Cal., to Missouri River points and points east thereof, H. Doc. 253-20 |