TABLE OF STATUTES CITED IN OPINIONS. (A.) STATUTES OF THE UNITED STATES. PAGE 1789, Sept. 24, 1 Stat. 73, c. 20 541 1800, Apr. 4, 2 Stat. 19, c. 19 365, 367 1800, Apr. 23, 2 Stat. 45, c. 33 338 1841, Aug. 19, 5 Stat. 440, c. 9 365, 367 1861, July 27, 12 Stat. 276, c. 21 482 1862, July 17, 12 Stat. 600, c. 204 339, 341, 392 1864, June 11, 13 Stat. 121, c. 116 175 1867, Mar. 2, 14 Stat. 517, c. 176 361, 364, 366, 367, 368, 369, 370, 371, 372, 373, 377, 379, 380, 583 1867, Mar. 2, 14 Stat. 471, c. 169 507 1868, July 20, 15 Stat. 125, c. 186 523, 533 1868, July 27, 15 Stat. 240, c. 273 523, 533 1871, Feb. 21, 16 Stat. 419, c. 62 150, 153, 527 1871, Mar. 3, 16 Stat. 544, c. 120 498 1873, Mar. 3, 17 Stat. 602, c. 268 142 1874, June 20, 18 Stat. 116, c. 336 151, 153 1874, June 22, 18 Stat. 178, c. 390..368, 370, 371, 372, 373, 379 1875, Mar. 3, 18 Stat. 470, c. 137 541 1876, July 21, 19 Stat. 94, c. 220 511 1880, June 16, 21 Stat. 284, 227 c. 243. .147, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154 1882, June 30, 22 Stat. 117, c. 254.. 1882, Aug. 7, 22 Stat. 302, c. 433 232, 234 1884, May 17, 23 Stat. 24, c. 53 532, 534 1885, Mar. 3, 23 Stat. 478, c. 360 439 1887, Feb. 4, 24 Stat. 379, c. 104 1890, June 10, 26 c. 407.. 1890, July 2, 26 Stat. Stat. 131, PAGE ...140, 143 209, c. 647 253, 297, 298 1890, Oct 1, 26 Stat. 567, c. 1244 142 1891, Mar. 3, 26 Stat. 826, c. 517 523, 524, 533 1891, Mar. 3, 26 Stat. 1084, c. 551... .443, 447, 448, 451, 452 1893, Feb. 9, 27 Stat. 434, c. 74 487 1893, Mar. 3, 27 Stat. 612, c. 209 499, 500 1893, Nov. 1, 28 Stat. 4, c. 8 145 1894, Aug. 27, 28 Stat. 509, c. 349......141, 142, 143, 145, 146 1895, Feb. 11, 28 Stat. 650, c. 79 233 1896, May 4, 29 Stat. 113, c. 155 240, 242 1897, Jan. 30, 29 Stat. 506, c. 109 490, 497, 505, 508 1897, Feb. 11, 29 Stat. 526, c. 216 320 1897, July 24, 30 Stat. 151, c. 11 140 1898, Mar. 15, 30 Stat. 318, c. 69 228, 229 360, 361, 363, 364, 367, 372, 373, 374, 375, 376, 377, 378, 379, 380, 381, 384, 385 1899, Mar. 3, 30 Stat. 1064, c. 423. 228 1900, Apr. 30, 31 Stat. 141, c. 339 349, 352, 353, 354, 355, 535 1900, May 26, 31 Stat. 205, c. 586 224, 225, 226, 229 540, 541, 542, 5431900, June 6, 31 Stat. 321, c. 786 1887, Feb. 8, 24 Stat. 388, c. 119 490, 491, 492, 497, 502, 503, 507 1887, Mar. 3, 24 Stat. 505, c. 359 152 1887, Mar. 3, 24 Stat. 552, c. 373 541, 542 1889, Mar. 2, 25 Stat. 980, c. 412 304, 310, 311 518, 519, 528, 529, 530, 533, 534 1900, June 6, 31 Stat. 1612, c. 839.... 336 1901, Mar. 2, 31 Stat. 895, c. 803 224, 226, 229 1901, Mar. 3, 31 Stat. 1107, c. 852.. 392 (B.) STATUTES OF THE STATES AND TERRITORIES. Political Code. § 3608..... .76, 77, 90, 93, 107 § 3609, 3610....77, 90, § 3617. § 3627. 3640. § 3819 Kentucky. Statutes, 1903, § 2834 432, 433, 434 .432 § 2835.. 1893, July 1, Laws, 18911893, p. 1265, c. 244.... 432 1898, Mar. 19, Laws 1898, p. 120, c. 48.. Louisiana. 1835, Apr. 1, Laws, 1835, 433 92 .77, 78, 90 p. 92.. ....453, 459 1845, Mar. 10, Laws, 1845, p. 59, No. 100-. 1854, Mar. 15, Laws, 1854, p. 66, No. 105.. 454 454 1870, Apr. 20, Laws, 1870, § 970. 199 CASES ADJUDGED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, AT OCTOBER TERM, 1904. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. ELY. SAME v. SAME. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. Nos. 102, 88. Submitted December 15, 1904.-Decided February 20, 1905. Northern Pacific Railway Company v. Townsend, 190 U. S. 267, affirmed as to the point that individuals cannot for private purposes acquire by adverse possession under a state statute of limitations any portion of the right of way granted to the Northern Pacific Railway Company. But by the act of April 28, 1904, that right of way was narrowed to two hundred feet in width and title acquired to land outside of a strip of that width was confirmed. As the decree in this case was rendered and a writ of error therefrom was pending in this court prior to April 28, 1904, the decree must be reversed and the case remanded to the state courts to be dealt with in view of the application of the act of April 28, 1904. THE facts are stated in the opinion. Mr. C. W. Bunn and Mr. James B. Kerr for plaintiff in error. Mr. William E. Cullen and Mr. Samuel R. Stern for Ely, defendant in error. VOL. CXCVII-1 (1) |