The American Journal of International Law, Volume 11American Society of International Law, 1917 The American Journal of International Law has been published quarterly since 1907 and is considered the premier English-language scholarly journal in its field. It features scholarly articles and editorials, notes and comment by preeminent scholars on developments in international law and international relations, and reviews of contemporary developments. The Journal contains summaries of decisions by national and international courts and arbitral and other tribunals, and of contemporary U.S. practice in international law. Each issue lists recent publications in English and other languages, many of which are reviewed in depth. Throughout its history, and particularly during first sixty years, the Journal has published full-text primary materials of particular importance in the field of international law. The contents of the current issue of the Journal are available on the ASIL web site. |
Dari dalam buku
Hasil 1-5 dari 97
Halaman 1
... military expediency promulgated in legal form by that belligerent government . In this case at least a British court has informed its government in unmistakable terms that Orders in Council governing the conduct of war must be in accord ...
... military expediency promulgated in legal form by that belligerent government . In this case at least a British court has informed its government in unmistakable terms that Orders in Council governing the conduct of war must be in accord ...
Halaman 24
... military necessity and pay no heed to the logical alternative of compensation when neutral property , granted immunity from capture by the Declaration of Paris , has been destroyed . Although the right to destroy must be admitted , it ...
... military necessity and pay no heed to the logical alternative of compensation when neutral property , granted immunity from capture by the Declaration of Paris , has been destroyed . Although the right to destroy must be admitted , it ...
Halaman 25
the tendency to act upon a priori determinations of military necessity . Simultaneously , the legal execution of a policy of destruction of cap- tures has been proved to be a doubtful possibility , even if the exist- ence of military ...
the tendency to act upon a priori determinations of military necessity . Simultaneously , the legal execution of a policy of destruction of cap- tures has been proved to be a doubtful possibility , even if the exist- ence of military ...
Halaman 32
... military disaster , it is the consequences of that disaster : the restrictions which the con- queror is in a position to impose upon the activities of the country , thenceforth unable to protect the freedom of its exchanges , of its ...
... military disaster , it is the consequences of that disaster : the restrictions which the con- queror is in a position to impose upon the activities of the country , thenceforth unable to protect the freedom of its exchanges , of its ...
Halaman 34
... military measure , an operation of war , and that its defense is therefore independent of the mediaval doctrine of the solidarity of sovereigns and states with their sub- jects . . . . Its justification must lie in its effect on the ...
... military measure , an operation of war , and that its defense is therefore independent of the mediaval doctrine of the solidarity of sovereigns and states with their sub- jects . . . . Its justification must lie in its effect on the ...
Edisi yang lain - Lihat semua
Istilah dan frasa umum
according Allies Appam April Article authority Belgian Belgium belligerent blockade Britain British Bryan-Chamorro Treaty Cañas-Jerez Treaty capture cargo claim Cleveland Award commerce Committee complaint Constitution contract convention Costa Rica crew Current History decision Declaration Declaration of London Declaration of Paris diplomatic doctrine Droit duty El Salvador enemy England English existence fact force France French Government of Nicaragua Greece Greek Grotius Gulf of Fonseca Hague Ibid international law jurisdiction justice King law of nations London March maritime matter ment military Minister naval navigation negotiations neutral country neutral port obligation opinion Order in Council pact peace possession present President principles Prize Court prize law proclamation protection provisions question recognized regard Republic respect rule Russia Salvador San Juan River says Senate ship sovereign sovereignty submarine territory tion Treaty Series United vessels violation warships Wheaton
Bagian yang populer
Halaman 718 - We wish for no victories but those of peace; for no territory except our own; for no sovereignty except the sovereignty over ourselves. We deem the independence and equal rights of the smallest and weakest member of the family of nations entitled to as much respect as those of the greatest empire, and we deem the observance of that respect the chief guaranty of the weak against the oppression of the strong. We neither claim nor desire any rights, or privileges, or powers that we do not freely concede...
Halaman 133 - Until a more complete code of the laws of war is issued, the High Contracting Parties think it right to declare that in cases not included in the Regulations adopted by them, populations and belligerents remain under the protection and empire of the principles of international law, as they result from the usages established between civilized nations, from the laws of humanity, and the requirements of the public conscience...
Halaman 620 - One of the things that has served to convince us that the Prussian autocracy was not and could never be our friend is that from the very outset of the present war it has filled our unsuspecting communities and even our offices of government with spies...
Halaman 447 - A neutral Power may allow prizes to enter its ports and roadsteads, whether under convoy or not, when they are brought there to be sequestrated pending the decision of a prize court. It may have the prize taken to another of its ports. If the prize is convoyed by a war-ship, the prize crew may go on board the convoying ship. If the prize is not under convoy, the prize crew are left at liberty.
Halaman 820 - If war should arise between the two contracting parties, the merchants of either country, then residing in the other, shall be allowed to remain nine months, to collect their debts and settle their affairs, and may depart freely carrying off all their effects, without molestation or hindrance...
Halaman 834 - Government. 5. Any Spanish merchant vessel which prior to April 21, 1898, shall have sailed from any foreign port bound for any port or place in the United States shall be permitted to enter such port or place and to discharge her cargo, and afterwards forthwith to depart without molestation; and any such vessel, if met at sea by any United States ship, shall be permitted to continue her voyage to any port not blockaded.
Halaman 171 - The President suggests that an early occasion be sought to call out from all the nations now at war such an avowal of their respective views as to the terms upon which the war might be concluded...
Halaman 306 - The vessels of war, public and private, of both parties, shall carry freely, wheresoever they please, the vessels and effects taken from their enemies, without being obliged to pay any duties, charges or fees to officers of admiralty, of the customs, or any others; nor shall such prizes be arrested, searched, or put...
Halaman 274 - If, for reasons of state, the ports of a nation generally, or any particular ports be closed against vessels of war generally, or the vessels of any particular nation, notice is usually given of such determination. If there be no prohibition, the ports of a friendly nation are considered as open to the public ships of all powers with whom it is at peace, and they are supposed to enter such ports and to remain in them while allowed to remain, under the protection of the government of the place.
Halaman 822 - It shall be lawful for all and singular the subjects of the Most Christian King, and the citizens, people and inhabitants of the said United States, to sail with their ships, with all manner of liberty and security, no distinction being made who are the proprietors of the merchandises laden thereon, from any port to the places of those who now are, or hereafter shall be at enmity with the Most Christian King or the United States.