Gambar halaman
PDF
ePub

of Surgery throughout the United King-| dom. The objects of the bill were, first, to provide that no one should be allowed to practise surgery without a testimonial from some of the regular colleges of the United Kingdom; secondly, that no more pecuniary fee should be demanded for such testimonial than had heretofore been usually paid; and, thirdly, that the laws should be repealed which precluded any surgeon from officiating in the hospitals and dispensaries of Ireland who had not obtained a testimonial from the college of surgeons in that country. Such being the provisions of a measure, the necessity for which, with a view to save the people from the danger of unskilful practitioners, was indisputable, he trusted that no opposition would be made to his motion.

Mr. Lockhart expressed an opinion, that if this bill originated with the surgeons, it must have a monopoly in view. The effect of it would be, to injure a profession which ought to have too much pride, to entertain any apprehension of the competition of pretenders.

The motion was agreed to.

EXCHEQUER BILLS.] The House having resolved itself into a Committee on the Exchequer Bills bill,

chequer bills, he requested him to state whether such was the fact. Because, if such were the purpose of the right hon. gentleman, that purpose should have immediate publicity, in order to put an end to the uncertainty, and gambling speculations, which at present prevailed in the city.

The Chancellor of the Exchequer said, he had already notified to the House, that it was not his intention to bring forward any part of his financial plan before Easter; and he trusted it would not be thought improper on his part to decline any premature or partial disclosure of that plan. With regard to the communication to the Stock Exchange, the hon. member alluded, he presumed, to that made by the broker of the commissioners for redeeming the National Debt. fact was, that, understanding a general expectation prevailed, that if exchequer bills were funded, a preference would be given to those bearing an interest of 24d. a day, he gave directions to have it made known, that if any funding of exchequer bills should take place, no such preference was intended.

The

Alderman Atkins expressed a wish, that the right hon. gentleman would favour the House with somewhat more of explanation, in order to remove the uncertainty that prevailed. For his own part, he could not think it desirable to fund any exchequer bills, and so to diminish the floating capital of the country. For how could it be politic to take a measure which must operate to reduce the price of stock? Government could raise money at less than 3 per cent, in consequence of the present price of stock; whereas if that price fell eight or ten per cent, it could not have money under 4 per cent. Such a fall would, he apprehended, be the result of funding, at present, a great quantity of exchequer bills. Another report prevailed, that it was the intention of the right hon. gentleman to propose the raising of a loan for the purpose of buying up the 5 per cents, and this was a plan which he must also deprecate. But at all events, he thought that no danger could result from the right hon. gentleman's explaining what were his views upon the points alluded to.

Mr. Grenfell said, that from some circumstances which had come to his knowledge, he felt it necessary to put a question to the chancellor of the exchequer. A report having prevailed last week in the city, that it was the intention of the right hon. gentleman to propose this session the funding of exchequer bills, and that what were called the twopenny halfpenny bills would be preferred, he understood that on Saturday last a communication was made to the Stock Exchange by the person who usually made known there the intentions of the Treasury, that it was not proposed, on funding exchequer bills, to grant a preference to any particular description of those bills, but to take those that were to be funded out of the general mass. Hence, an impression prevailed in the city, that it was the intention of the right hon. gentleman to fund a considerable number of exchequer bills. He did not wish for any information from the right hon. gentleman as to any part The Chancellor of the Exchequer hoped of his financial plan, which might not yet the House would feel the propriety of bematured; but, understanding that it was his silence with regard to the financial the intention of the right hon. gentleman, plan to be submitted to its consideration, in all events, to fund a quantity of ex-until that plan was fully matured-until,

indeed, he was actually proposing to have | tioner being informed of this nocturnal it carried into effect.

Mr. Grenfell approved of the intention of the right hon. gentleman not to make any premature disclosure of his financial plan. His only object in putting a question to the right hon. gentleman was, to do away the impression in the city, that he had finally made up his mind as to the funding of exchequer bills.

The Bill went through the committee.

HOUSE OF COMMONS.

Friday, February 13.

PETITIONS FROM JOSEPH MITCHELL, THOMAS EVANS, WILLIAM OGDEN, JOHN STEWART, and WILLIAM BEN. BOW, COMPLAINING OF THE OPERATION OF THE HABEAS CORPUS SUSPENSION Аст.] Mr. Bennet said, he held in his hand a Petition from one of those unfortunate men who had suffered so much severity and real cruelty under the Suspension act. It was from Joseph Mitchell, of Liverpool. He was in that situation which had been said to render men unworthy of credit. He had beyond all question suffered imprisonment without indictment or trial, but whether he was therefore unworthy of credit he would leave to others to determine. He most certainly believed the representations of harsh usage, unauthorized cruelty, and wanton treatment in the petition to be .true. The facts were such as claimed the most serious attention of the House, and the prayer of the petition called upon them not to pass a bill of indemnity to screen ministers from the consequences of their abuse of the powers intrusted to them. Mr. Bennet having moved, that the petition be printed, the chancellor of the exchequer asked, if the hon. member could state that it was couched in respectful language? Mr. Bennet, said, that there might be a harsh expression, but the tenor of the petition was respectful.

The petition was then ordered to be printed. It set forth:

"That the Petitioner, whilst attending on his business as agent to several publishers, had, on the evening of the 2nd of March 1817, his lodgings in Manchester forcibly entered, his bed-room searched for his person and papers, and his portmanteau attempted to be opened by false keys and picklocks, by Joseph Nadin, deputy constable of Manchester, and two of his men called runners: that the peti

visit by a person who happened to be in the house at the time, and heard the landlord threatened with the loss of his licence if he informed the petitioner thereof, the petitioner, having a wife and six young children to provide for, sought refuge in the house of a friend; that the petitioner was driven from this retreat by Nadin and his assistants, who forcibly entered his friend's house in the night, and searched the same; and in this manner was the petitioner driven from house to house, Nadin threatening he would have him locked up in prison if it cost him (Nadin) 500l.; thus was he pursued until the 9th of March, when he left Manchester to seek a resting place in the country, but being still pursued he fled to his disConsolate family in Liverpool; that the petitioner had not remained many days with his agonized family before he was informed that the police were about to search his house, and fearing that the shock occasioned by his being dragged from home in the dead of the night (that being the time generally chosen for tearing reformers from their beloved families) would be too great for an afflicted wife, and six young but affectionate children to bear, he therefore again sought an asylum in the country; that the petitioner, having returned in the vicinity of Manchester, was instantly informed that a number of persons had been apprehended at a public house in Manchester, charged with having conspired together for the purpose of destroying that town, many of which persons (if at all connected with such a plot) were believed to have been led and instigated thereto by spies and informers, who had gone about for the avowed purpose (as the petitioner was informed) of making Manchester, as they called it, a second Moscow; that the petitioner, finding this to be no resting place for him, proceeded into Yorkshire, where he was advised to proceed to London and state these facts, with the popular opinion thereon, to some men who were both able and willing if possible to trace these plots to their true source; that the petitioner whilst in London met with a person named Oliver, who professed to be a reformer, and who urged the petitioner to leave London with him, stating that the petitioner was in danger of being appre hended in London, and that he (Oliver) was in constant apprehension of being taken up, and that he had therefore de

tioner into some violent expression, and the petitioner was confirmed in this opinion, by hearing another person cough behind the door, on which the petitioner demanded that this vile fellow should leave the room: that the petitioner was next day taken before justice Haigh, of Huddersfield, who on one Brooks of Golker Hill stating that the petitioner was a reformer, and had attended public meetings, and that a reward was offered by government for his apprehension, ordered him to be remanded; on the petitioner remonstrating against being detained on so vague a charge, the worthy justice replied, He would take all responsibility upon him

[ocr errors]

termined to leave the country, and was then going to Liverpool to see a friend of his set sail for America, and also to prepare a passage for himself and family, that the petitioner left London in company with the said Oliver on the 24th of April, who on the road requested the petitioner to introduce him to a few steady reformers in any of the towns through which they passed where the petitioner had any acquaintance, which he accordingly did, in Birmingham, Wakefield, and Leeds, believing him to be a real reformer; that on the 4th of May the petitioner was seized by two ruffians, who took him by the collar as he was walking on the highway towards Huddersfield, and command-self,' and delivered the petitioner into ed him to return to some men who (these ruffians said) wanted him, which command the petitioner refused to comply with, asking them by what authority they stopped him on the king's highway? to which question they returning no answer, the petitioner attempted to proceed on his journey, when the ruffians, again seiz. ing him by the collar, said, "We will let you see our authority;" that the petitioner was by them detained on the king's highway until five or six other men came up to them, who ordered him to go along with them; the petitioner then inquired by what authority they detained and ordered him to go along with them, when two of them said that they were special constables, and that the petitioner should know farther when he got to the place to which they intended to take him, adding, that, if the petitioner refused to go with them, they would compel him, bidding some of their fellows to drag him along; that the petitioner was therefore obliged go with them to a public house, situated in a lonely place called Golker Hill, where he was taunted and otherwise abused through the whole of the evening; that when the petitioner retired to bed, a person was put into his room, who pretending to be a reformer, expressed much regret that it should have fallen to his lot to guard a person whom he could not but respect as a brother, and who exclaimed in bitter terms against those who were the cause of such unjust proceedings, adding, that not only a total change in Kings, 'Castlereaghs, and Commons,' must take place, but that all must be pulled down before any good would be done for the people,' which wretch the petitioner believes (as he then told him) was placed there for the purpose of leading the peti(VOL. XXXVII. )

to

[ocr errors]

the care of a police officer named Whitehead; that the petitioner was conducted by Whitehead into a room in the GeorgeInn, Huddersfield, where he asked the petitioner if he would pay for a person to guard him, on which the petitioner replied that he had neither the power nor the will to pay money for any such purpose; then Whitehead bade the petitioner to follow him to a lodging which he said was much better than the petitioner deserved; that the petitioner was then put into a place called Towzer, the most damp and nauseous dungeon imaginable, having no fire in it, the floor of which was nearly covered with human excrements, the bedding beyond description filthy, and the whole place was fœtid to such a degree that the petitioner scarcely thought it pos sible to exist therein until the next day; that the petitioner remained in this nauseous place twenty-six hours, after which he was removed to a room where Oliver appeared as a prisoner in great agitation; the petitioner was shortly removed to another house, where he was ironed, then placed between two thief-takers in a chaise and conveyed to Manchester Police-office, and thence to the New Bayley prison; that the petitioner, when in the police-office, and also in the New Bayley, demanded to be informed for what he was detained, and by what authority he had been apprehended, but no answer was given to him until the 7th of May, when the petitioner was brought before a number of gentlemen in a room belonging to the New Bayley, where one of them appeared to preside; here Nadin, the deputy constable, deposed that he had seen a warrant, signed (he doubted not) by the secretary of state, authorizing the apprehension of Mr. Mitchell on a charge of (2 D)

high treason; that this warrant had been returned to the home office, because they had heard that the petitioner was gone to America; that the petitioner requested to know whether the gentleman who presided intended to keep him in custody on the mere deposition of Nadin? when he was informed that it was their intention to detain him until they heard farther from the home office; the petitioner then requested to withdraw to his cell and straw bed, which was granted, where he remained until about twelve o'clock on the night of the 8th of May, when he was ordered to prepare for London; during his confinement in the New Bayley, the petitioner was insulted with the felons allowance of food, and was told that Nadin had given orders that nothing else should be given to him; that the petitioner was then handcuffed, and so conducted to the policeoffice, thence to the coach, and was there very heavily ironed, which irons he bore all the way to London; being arrived there, the petitioner was taken to a public-house in Bow-street, and from thence before the secretary of state, who ordered him to be put into close confinement, until the 20th of May, when he was to be brought up for examination, as he understood; that the petitioner was then taken to Cold-bath-fields prison, and put into a room with another prisoner, where he became dangerously ill, through, as he supposes, the baneful effects of that pestilential place in which he was confined at Huddersfield: the petitioner wishes to state, that although he still feels the ill effects of that destructive place at Huddersfield, he considers his present state of health to be owing to the kind attentions of his fellow prisoner, the doctor, and the governor; that the petitioner was again taken before the secretary of state, who committed him to close confinement on suspicion of high treason; he was therefore remanded to Cold-bath-fields prison, where he remained in close and solitary confinement, except being visited by Oliver three successive days on or about the 21st, 22nd, and 23d of May, on each of which days the petitioner was fetched by a turnkey into a room in the governor's house, where his interviews with Oliver took place; that on the 30th of Dec. 1817, the petitioner was liberated, as he understood, without recognizance, until, on the 21st of January 1818, he was informed by the mayor of Liverpool, that he had received a letter from the home

secretary, which stated, that in consequence of his lordship having heard nothing against him since his liberation, his appearance on the first day of term in the court of King's-bench would be dispensed with, and hoping that his future conduct would be such as never to render it necessary to call him into a court of justice; that the petitioner, in consequence of the mayor's communication, deemed it necessary, though at a great and very inconvenient expense, to appear in the said court of King's-bench, in order to get such supposed recognizance nullified, that he might not in future be subjected to extraordinary penalties on the misrepresentations of malevolent or interested men; that the petitioner, though altoge ther unconscious of having violated, or intending to violate, any constitutional principle or law of the land, but who on the contrary has made considerable efforts to preserve the peace of the country and the lives of his much aggrieved countrymen, whom he considered in danger of being goaded on by hunger and by spies to acts of desperation; that, in consequence of the petitioner's unjust imprisonment, his business is totally ruined, himself involved in very considerable embarrassments, his character traduced, and his friends and connexions enormously imposed upon, by the misrepresentations of spies and informers, which spies and informers have introduced themselves to the petitioner's acquaintance under the pretence of collecting money for his or his family's use, and have otherwise so made use of his name to excite the more distressed parts of the labouring class to acts of violence whilst the petitioner was in prison; that the doors of his friends are shut against him, and himself precluded the possibility of providing for his helpless family through the common course of trade; that though the petitioner considers that the House furnished the minis ters of the Crown with that power which they have so wantonly and unprovokedly used against him, in dragging him from his family and immuring him in a solitary dungeon 241 days, yet the petitioner trusting that such powers were granted for the wisest of purposes, implores that the House will not only refuse to give its sanction to a bill of indemnity, to screen those ministers who have abused the powers the House confided to them, but, as in times less oppressive, when the House interposed their powerful aid to

Mr. Bennet also presented a Petition from Thomas Evans, of No. 8, Newcastlestreet, Strand, setting forth;

stop the torrent of unjust persecution, | jesty's most honourable privy council, they will now so take the petitioner's case through which nefarious artifice sufficient into their most serious consideration, as time having elapsed, she was, after ento grant him that redress which will ena- during three days imprisonment, permitble him to bring to justice such indivi- ted to return to the petitioner's house, duals as have so incalculably injured him, which she found had, during her absence, and also enable him to meet his friends been filled with police officers of the lowest and connexions as he should have done and most brutal kind, who had been sent had he not been so unjustly imprisoned; thither to apprehend every person that and the petitioner, forgetting the sor- might visit the house whilst they held unrows of a solitary imprisonment, will, as in lawful possession, which supposed autho. duty bound, ever pray." rity they had acted upon to the extreme, even inviting some of the friends of the petitioner into the house, in order to comprise them within their assumed juris"That the Petitioner solicits the ear- diction; and the police officers, when they nest attention of the House, to the griev- had satisfied themselves with the number ous and illegal persecutions which he is of their seizures, had abandoned the house about to detail, in full confidence that he to whatever accident might have befallen is able to adduce undeniable proof of the it, had not the sister of the petitioner's correctness of every allegation, and in ar- wife fortunately arrived and prevented dent hope that the House, as the consti- farther mischief by her presence; that at tutional guardian of public right, and the end of two years and eleven months, avenger of individual oppression, will in- the petitioner was liberated, without trial terpose their high authority to enable him or any recompence for the manifold injuto obtain plenary justice; that on the ries he had sustained, and before he could 18th of April, 198, the petitioner was proceed to obtain legal redress, the authors seized, pursuant to a warrant charging and inflictors of those injuries procured him with high treason, issued by the late from parliament an especial act of indemduke of Portland, then one of his ma- nity for this and other similar abuses of jesty's principal secretaries of state; that their ministerial trust; so that thus ruined the petitioner was held under re-examina- in property, debilitated in health, and cation until the bill for suspending the Ha- lumniated in character, his profession rebeas Corpus act was passed, and was then duced, his connexions broken up, and all committed, on pretence of treasonable the fruits of his previous industry dissipractices, to the house of correction for pated, he found himself at length sudMiddlesex, from whence he was trans- denly cast upon the world to maintain his ported to the county gaol at Winchester, family, under circumstances which seemed and again to that at Chelmsford, at which to forebode years of penury and privation; gaols he was treated with more rigour that the petitioner, since his liberation than the common felons, being denied, from this confessedly illegal imprisonment, during the whole period of this long im- had not taken any part in political affairs prisonment, the use of books, or the pos- of any description, but had been sedulously session of pen, ink, or paper, or the ac- engaged in the business which he had cess of friends or relations; indeed so se- taken up, and from the labours of which vere was the nature and so lengthened the for sixteen years he had never indulged duration of this unjust confinement, that in two successive days of recreation, his after his liberation, the petitioner was fre- former persecution and unrequited losses quently afflicted with a dropsical malady, having rendered the utmost industry and or species of erysipelas in his limbs, which carefulness necessary on his part to provide has greatly impaired his former excellent for his declining years, and against the state of health, and sometimes rendered dangerous attacks of the incurable malady him an invalid eighteen months together; contracted in consequence of the rigour that on the day following his arrest, the and closeness of his imprisonment; that wife of the petitioner, though far advanced the petitioner had succeeded, through his in pregnancy, was, with their infant son, unremitting exertions, in establishing a committed on the same false charge to manufactory of patent braces and spiral the house of correction, amongst the fe- steel springs, to which he looked up as a male felons, from whence she was taken secure shelter from the approaches of fuand examined before the lords of his mature distress, when, notwithstanding his

« SebelumnyaLanjutkan »