Gambar halaman
PDF
ePub

Cases not otherwise Reported.

No. 103. UNION PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY V. JONES. Error to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. November 14, 1895: Dismissed with costs on motion of Mr. John F. Dillon for plaintiff in error, and cause remanded to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado. Mr. John F. Dillon and Mr. John M. Thurston for plaintiff in error. Mr. E. T. Wells and Mr. R. T. McNeal for defendant in error.

No. 245. UNION PACIFIO RAILWAY COMPANY U. REESE. Error to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. April 20, 1896: Dismissed with costs pursuant to the tenth rule. Mr. Samuel Shellabarger, Mr. J. M. Wilson and Mr. John M. Thurston for plaintiff in error. Mr. S. M. Stockslager and Mr. George C. Heard for defendant in

error.

No. 913. UNITED STATES V. ARNOLD. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. March 9, 1896: Petition denied. Mr. Hiram T. Gilbert for petitioner. Mr. Levy Mayer opposing.

Appeal from the

No. 106. UNITED STATES v. AULICK. Court of Claims. October 14, 1895: Dismissed on motion of Mr. Solicitor General for the appellant. Mr. Attorney General and Mr. Solicitor General for appellant. No appearance for appellee.

No. 249. UNITED STATES v. FINCH. Appeal from the Court of Claims. October 14, 1895: Dismissed on motion of Mr. Solicitor General for appellant. Mr. Attorney General for appellant. Mr. J. Altheus Johnson for the appellee.

No. 814.

UNITED STATES v. HARDEN. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for

Cases not otherwise Reported.

the Second Circuit. December 16, 1895: Petition denied. Mr. Attorney General and Mr. Solicitor General Conrad for petitioners. Mr. Charles Curie, Mr. W. Wickham Smith and Mr. D. I. Mackie, opposing.

No. 108. UNITED STATES v. LOVELL. Appeal from the Court of Claims. October 14, 1895: Dismissed on motion of Mr. Solicitor General for appellant. Mr. Attorney General and Mr. Solicitor General for appellants. No appearance for appellee.

No. 700. UNITED STATES v. UNION PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. March 23, 1896: Dismissed per stipulation. Mr. Attorney General and Mr. Solicitor General for appellants. Mr. M. R. Kelly and Mr. A. L. Williams for appellee.

No. 483. UNITED STATES v. ZUCKER. Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. May 18, 1896: Dismissed, per stipulation, on motion of Mr. Solicitor General for plaintiff in error. Mr. Attorney General and Mr. Solicitor General for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Abram J. Rose for defendants in error.

No. 965. WALRATH V. CHAMPION MINING COMPANY. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. April 20, 1896: Petition denied. Mr. James F. Smith for petitioner. No one opposing.

No. 178. WASHINGTON STATE v. BOARD OF HARBOR LINE COMMISSIONERS. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Washington. October 14, 1895: Dismissed per stipulation. Mr. A. H. Holmes for plaintiff in error. Mr. W. C. Jones for defendant in error.

Cases not otherwise Reported.

No. 264. WASHINGTON STATE v. BOARD OF TIDE LAND APPRAISERS OF WHATCOM COUNTY. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Washington. April 29, 1896: Dismissed with costs pursuant to the tenth rule. Mr. W. H. Calkins for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Alfred L. Black for defendants in error.

No. 727. WAYNE LUMBER COMPANY . COLLINS. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Missouri. May 4, 1896: Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Mr. J. N. Morrison and Mr. Warwick Massey Hough for plaintiff in error. Mr. Eleneious Smith for defendants in error.

No. 275. WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. CHARLESTON. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of South Carolina. October 14, 1895: Dismissed with costs on authority of counsel for appellants. Mr. A. T. Smythe for appellant. No appearance for appellees.

No. 257. WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. CHESTER. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Pennsylvania. April 27, 1896: Dismissed with costs on the authority of counsel for plaintiff in error. Mr. Silas W. Pettit for plaintiff in error. No appearance for the defendant in error.

No. 235. WHEELER v. CLOYD. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Illinois. April 27, 1896: Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Mr. H. Tompkins for appellants. Mr. J. C. Clayton, Mr. Lemuel Skidmore, Mr. Edwin Beecher and Mr. Henry C. Whitney for appellees.

No. 708. WHITE V. LENNIG. Error to the Supreme Court of Appeals of the State of Virginia. February 3, 1896: Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction on the authority of John

Cases not otherwise Reported.

son v. Risk, 137 U. S. 300, and Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361. Mr. John E. Roller for plaintiff in error. Mr. Holmes Conrad and Mr. E. II. Conrad for defendants in error.

No. 809. WILKEY alias DAVIS v. UNITED STATES. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Arkansas. March 9, 1896: Judgment affirmed. No appearance for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Attorney General and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Dickinson for defendant in error.

No. 123. WILLIAMS v. WILBUR.

Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kansas. December 11, 1895: Dismissed with costs pursuant to the tenth rule. Mr. C. O. Tichenor for plaintiff in error. Mr. Willard Teller for defendant in error.

No. 554. WILLMAN U. FRIEDMAN. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Idaho. December 23, 1895: Dismissed with costs per stipulation. Mr. A. L. Rhodes for plaintiff in error. Mr. Arthur Brown for defendant in error.

No. 726. YANOEY v. Ivy. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Missouri. May 4, 1896: Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Mr. J. N. Morrison, Mr. Warwick Massey Hough and Mr. Warwick Hough for plaintiff in error. Mr. George G. Vest for defendant in error.

1

II.

SUMMARY STATEMENT OF BUSINESS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR OCTOBER TERM, 1895.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

Number of cases on appellate docket at close of the October
Term, 1894, not disposed of . .

Number of cases docketed during October Term, 1895

Total ..

Number of cases disposed of October Term, 1895

Number of cases remaining undisposed of, showing a reduc

[merged small][ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

640

382

1022

489

533

718

« SebelumnyaLanjutkan »