 | United States. Supreme Court - 1940 - 894 halaman
...statutes, held a construction of the Sherman Act and reviewable under the Criminal Appeals Act. P. 195. 4. Repeals by implication are not favored. When there are two Acts upon the same subject, effect should be given to both if possible. P. 198. 5. The Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1982 - 1050 halaman
...favored,'" Morton v. Mancari, 417 US, at 549, quoting Posadas v. National City Bank, 296 US 497, 503 (1936). "The intention of the legislature to repeal must be 'clear and manifest.'" United States v. Borden Co., 308 US 188, 198 (1939), quoting Red Rock v. Henry, 106 US 596, 602 (1883).... | |
 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1909 - 1076 halaman
...frequently considered by the courts of this state and is well defined. Where there are two acts on the same subject, the rule is to give effect to both, if possible. If the two acts arc 8 Buch. State i Viueland. repugnant in any of their provisions, the later act operates... | |
 | New Jersey. Court of Chancery - 1885 - 678 halaman
...which must control the decision of the case is perfectly well settled. Where there are two acts on the same subject, the rule is to give effect to both, if possible. But if the two are repugnant in any of their provisions, the later act, without any repealing clause,... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1919 - 660 halaman
...repeals by implication is laid down in United States v. Tynen* as follows : ' It is a familiar doctrine that repeals by implication are not favored. When there are two acts on the same subject, the rule is to give effect to both, if possible. But if the two are repugnant... | |
 | United States. Court of Claims - 1924 - 792 halaman
...enactment. In Tynen's case, 11 Wall. 88, 92, the rule is thus stated : " When there are two acts on the same subject the rule is to give effect to both if possible. But if the two are repugnant in any of their provisions, the latter act, without any repealing clause,... | |
 | United States. Court of Claims - 1944 - 656 halaman
...intended as a substitute, it will operate similarly as a repeal of the earlier act. But, in either case, the intention of the legislature to repeal must be clear and manifest; otherwise, at least as a general thing, (he later act is to be construed as a continuation of, and... | |
 | 1883 - 552 halaman
...covers the whole ground occupied by the earlier and is clearly intended as a substitute for it, and the intention of the legislature to repeal must be clear and manifest. The leaning of Hie courts is against repeals by implication (United States v. Tyuen, 11 Wall. 88),... | |
 | 1883 - 548 halaman
...covers the whole ground occupied by the earlier and is clearly intended as a substitute for it, and the intention of the legislature to repeal must be clear and manifest. The leaning of the courts is against repeals by implication (United States v. Tyuen, 11 Wall. 88),... | |
 | Lorenzo Smith Boswell Sawyer, United States. Circuit Court (9th Circuit) - 1878 - 772 halaman
...rule on this subject is expressed by Mr. Justice Field in United States v. Tyner, supra, as follows: "When there are two acts upon the same subject, the rule is to give effect to both if possible. But if the two are repugnant in any of their provisions, the latter act, without any repealing clause,... | |
| |
When there are two acts on the same subject the rule is to give effect to both if possible. But if the two are repugnant in any of their provisions, the latter act, without any repealing clause, operates to the extent of the repugnancy as a repeal of... 
