is what you gotta work on. His argument is that you're so well know, your pluses are as clear as your minuses; that getting one of those 20, who is an undecided type, to vote for you on the basis of your positive points is much less likely than getting him to vote against McGovern by scaring him to death about McGovern; and that that's the area that we ought to be playing. Well. (Unintelligible) Well, I am not going to do it. I really want you to bring in Flanigan and all these others (unintelligible) and lay Р H P Don't you think he'll agree? Oh, you don't? No, I think they will. They'll agree for awhile (unintelligible) agree they'll say well why not do it anyway. - No, No, Nope, No Never! I can't take it for granted. Listen, he could think I'm setting him up (unintelligible) reasonable man. God damn it, (unintelligible) I have him be against Muskie. We don't give a (expletive deleted). Or, Nixon! screw him otherwise fine. I don't know if our people would be scared (unintelligible) about Muskie. H (Unintelligible) they are. They aren't, but I think you got to build that up. His point is that so little is know, better chance of (voices fade) |