Gambar halaman
PDF
ePub

CHAPTER XXIII.

ARTICLE II.—THE EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT.

It seems to us a matter of course that after the laws are made there should be some person or persons whose duty it should be to carry them into execution. But it will be remembered that under the confederation there was no executive department. The colonists had suffered from kingly rule, and in forming their first government after independence, they naturally avoided anything having the appearance of kingliness. After trying their experiment for some years, however, their "sober second sense" told them that the executive department is a necessity, and when the convention assembled to "revise the articles of confederation" (as they at first intended to do) one of the things upon which there was practical unanimity of opinion was the necessity of having the government organized into three departments.

The question in regard to the executive department was how to organize it, so as to secure two chief qualities; namely, energy of execution and safety to the people. The former was fully appreciated, for the weakness of execution during the confederation period, or the lack of execution, had impressed upon all thinking persons the necessity of more vigor in carrying out the laws. The experience during colonial days emphasized the necessity of surrounding the office with proper safeguards. And among those intrusted with the organization of a scheme of government, were many who were well versed in history-men who knew that the executive department is the one in which lies the menance to human liberty

Under these two main branches of the problem, arose such questions as: How many persons shall constitute the executive? What shall the term be? How shall the executive be chosen? What powers, other than those which are purely executive, shall be vested in the department? What checks shall be placed about the executive, or how shall the department be held responsible, without crippling its efficiency?

How well the problem was solved, we shall find out in our study of the provisions of the constitution pertaining to this department.

Clause 1.- Vestment of Power.

2

The executive power shall be vested in a president of the United States of America.1 He shall hold his office during the term of four years, and together with the vice-president, chosen for the same term, shall be elected as follows:

3

1This sentence answers the question, "How many persons shall constitute the executive?" and gives the official title of the executive.

The executive authority is vested in one person for two chief reasons: To secure energy in execution, and to impose upon the executive a sense of responsibility. If the executive power were vested in a number of persons, the differences and jealousies sure to arise, and the absence of responsibility, would result in a feeble administration, which is but another name for a bad administration.

2The term first reported by the committee of the whole was seven years, with the provision forbidding re-election. Some of the delegates were in favor of annual elections, while others thought that the executive should be elected for life or good behavior. And other

[ocr errors]

terms, varying from two to ten years, had their advo cates. After much discussion, the term of four years was agreed upon as a compromise, and no limitation was put upon the number of terms for which a person might be elected.

In another place it is made the duty of the president to recommended to congress such measures as he deems necessary for the good of the country. He should, therefore, have a term long enough to fairly test his "policy" and to stimulate him to personal firmness in the execution of his duties, yet not so long as to free him from a sense of responsibility. It was thought that a term of four years would cover both of the conditions mentioned.

The purpose of having a vice-president is to provide a successor for the president in case of his disability or death.

CHOOSING THE PRESIDENT AND VICE-PRESIDENT.

Clause 2.-Number and Appointment of Electors. Each state shall appoint, in such manner as the legislature thereof may direct, a number of electors equal to the whole number of senators and representatives to which the state may be entitled in the congress; but no senator or representative, or person holding an office of trust or profit under the United States, shall be appointed an elector.

Three plans for the election of president and vicepresident were proposed: First, election by congress; second, election by the people; third, election by persons chosen by the people for that special purpose.

The objection to the first plan was, that it would rob the executive department of that independence which

in our plan of government it is designed to possess-it would render the executive department in a measure subordinate to the legislative department.

The objections to the second plan came from two sources. Some of the delegates feared that, inexperienced as they were, the people could not be trusted to act wisely in the choice of a president-that they would be swayed by partizan feeling, instead of acting with cool deliberation. And the small states feared that in a popular election their power would count for little.

Then the compromise in the organization of the congress was remembered, and it was resolved that the election of the president and vice-president should be placed in the hands of persons chosen for that special purpose, and that the number of the electors from each state should be that of its representation in congress. This satisfied both parties. Those who thought that the people could not be intrusted with so important a matter as the choice of the president, hoped that this mode would place the election in the hands of the wise men of the several states. And the delegates from the small states secured in this all the concession which they could fairly ask.

This matter being settled, the next question was: How shall the electors be chosen? There being much difference of opinion on the subject, it was thought best to let each state choose its electors in the way which it might prefer.

Naturally the modes of choosing electors varied. In some states the legislature chose them, but this mode soon became unpopular.* In some states they were chosen by the people on a general ticket, and in others,

*South Carolina, however, retained this mode until very recently.

by the people by congressional districts. The last is the fairest way, because it most nearly represents the wishes of the people. By electing on a general ticket, the party which is in the majority in any state can elect all of the electors. But, for this very reason, the majority in each state has finally arranged the matter so that this is now the practice in all the states.

The present system of nominations and pledged electors was undreamed of by the framers of the constitution. They intended that in the selection of the president each elector should be free to vote according to his own best judgment. But it has come to pass that the electors simply register a verdict already rendered. Briefly the history of the change is this: During the administration of Washington (who had been elected unanimously) differences of opinion on questions of policy gave rise to political parties. To secure the unity of action so essential to success, the leaders of the respective parties, by agreement among themselves, designated, as each election approached, persons whom they recommended for support by electors of their party. Gradually the recommendation came to be looked upon as binding. In 1828 the Anti-Masonic party, having no members of congress to act as leaders, held a "people's convention." Its nominees received a surprisingly large vote. The popularity of this mode of nomination thus appearing, the other parties adopted it at the next election, and it has remained a part of our political machinery.

Clause 3.-Election of President and Vice-President.

The electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for two persons, of whom one at least shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves.

« SebelumnyaLanjutkan »