 | Thomas McIntyre Cooley - 1871 - 846 halaman
...the case of private corporations or parties ; but when the acts or omissions complained of were done or omitted in the exercise of a corporate franchise...upon the corporation for the public good, and not for the private corporate advantage, then the corporation is not liable for the consequences of such acts... | |
 | Thomas McIntyre Cooley - 1874 - 904 halaman
...the case of private corporations or parties ; but when the acts or omissions complained of were done or Omitted in the exercise of a corporate franchise...upon the corporation for the public good, and not for the private corporate advantage, then the corporation is not liable for the consequences of such acts... | |
 | William Wait - 1878 - 1004 halaman
...the case of private corporations or parties. But when the acts or omissions complained of were done or omitted in the exercise of a corporate franchise...acts or omissions on the part of its officers and servants. Murtaugh v. St. Louis, 44 Mo. 479. See, also, Richmond v. Long, 1 7 Gratt. 375 ; ante, 595,... | |
 | Thomas McIntyre Cooley - 1878 - 1032 halaman
...exercise of a corporate franchise conferred upon the corporation for the public good, and not for the private corporate advantage, then the corporation is not liable for the consequences of such acts or omislions." Citing Bailey v. New York, 3 Hill, 531; Martin v. Brooklyn, 1 Hill, 530: Richmond v. Long's... | |
 | 1888 - 864 halaman
...liable, as in the case of private corporations or individuals; but when the acts complained of were done in the exercise of a corporate franchise conferred...corporation is not liable for the consequences of such acts. In the former case, the rule of respondeat superior governs; in tho latter case, it does not: Murtaugh... | |
 | Washington (State). Supreme Court, Eugene Genroy Kreider - 1894 - 806 halaman
...the case of private corporations or parties; but when the acts or omissions complained of were done or omitted in the exercise of a corporate franchise...acts or omissions on the part of its officers and servants.7' The same doctrine was enunciated in other cases above cited; and in Mead v. New Haven it... | |
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - 1911 - 1026 halaman
...the case of private corporations or parties; but when the acts or omissions complained of were done or omitted in the exercise of a corporate franchise...acts or omissions on the • part of its officers and servants." The same doctrine was enunciated in other cases above cited; and in Mead v. New Haven, 40... | |
 | Waterman Lester Williams - 1901 - 414 halaman
...the case of private corporations or parties; but when the acts or omissions complained of were done or omitted in the exercise of a corporate franchise...acts or omissions on the part of its officers and servants." § 13. Officers performing Legislative or Judicial Duties. — That large and varied class... | |
 | 1905 - 986 halaman
...secure the general health of the inhabitants, and to abate, prevent, and remove nuisunces, the power Is conferred upon the corporation for the public good and not for private corporate advantage, and such power is exercised by the city council in the passing of an ordinance devolving upon {he constable,... | |
 | 1906 - 1270 halaman
...commission of the Injury complained of by plaintiff; but If the injury was committed while Brunke was In the exercise of a corporate franchise conferred...public good, and not for private corporate advantage, the corporation is not liable for the wrongful acts of its servant. On the other hand, if Brunke was... | |
| |
... in the exercise of a power conferred upon the corporation for its private benefit, and injury ensues from the negligence or misfeasance of such officer or servant, the corporation is liable, as in the case of private corporations or parties; but when... 
